Doomscroll News

  • The Textbook and the Black Hole

    Hearing a statement like, “Reducing interest rates increases inflation, dumb***,” is a perfect example of a textbook classic. It’s a solid rule for a straightforward game. The only issue is the assumption that we’re still playing that same simple game.

    This level of complexity might not even be new. It’s entirely possible that a layered reality, with a simple narrative for the public and a far more intricate one behind the scenes, has been the standard operating procedure for a long, long time.

    The very data used to form these opinions requires a massive leap of faith in its authenticity. As a show like “Rabbit Hole” on Paramount+ pointed out, deepfakes are not just about eroding trust; they are a tool for constructing a completely false reality to get a specific reaction. The fake TV broadcast in the opening scene that sets the whole story in motion is a perfect metaphor; what is presented as ‘the news’ or ‘market data’ could easily be a meticulously crafted illusion.

    This concept extends directly into the financial system itself. The problem of “fails to deliver” is not a simple clerical error; it’s the financial system’s version of a deepfake. Attempts to get the raw FTD data through Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests hit a black hole. The trail goes cold under the official reasoning that it’s proprietary “corporate” information, a designation that can make it more secret than classified documents. A mechanism like that being in place during the massive market convulsions and wealth transfers of the COVID era makes tracing what really happened almost impossible.

    Therefore, hearing a simple, clean economic rule is difficult to take at face value. In a world of systemic financial deception and deepfakes that can manufacture reality, claiming to know what’s really going on is a profoundly optimistic stance.

  • The Art of the Missile

    I have a hunch about something I call ‘the art of the missile,’ and it makes me question if tariffs alone are a durable solution to our debt. It’s a feeling that we are underestimating how fragile our entire economic system is in the face of modern warfare tactics.

    My concern is that the strength of tariffs depends entirely on a functioning economy with intact infrastructure like ports, power grids, and manufacturing hubs. What happens to the power of those tariffs when the Axis of Evil decides to use a few well placed Zircon cruise missiles or a swarm of advanced drones? They have these weapons stockpiled and ready to mobilize. If Putin or another adversary starts shooting, not necessarily at people, but at our critical economic infrastructure, the entire tariff structure could collapse overnight. Your solution to the debt would be gone in an instant.

    Beyond that direct military threat, you cannot deny there seems to be a significant media cover up suggesting things are not what they seem on the world stage. How do we explain the reports where Ukrainians and their helpers conveniently evacuate a key area right before it gets hit, or when the Russians do the same thing before a major strike on one of their important targets? It points to a level of coordination or information control hidden from the public. It all feels managed, especially when you see players like JP Morgan lining up with Biden to talk about rebuilding everything afterward. It suggests the conflict itself is just a phase in a larger economic plan for the global elite.

    This is why when people bring up other solutions, like AI and technological dominance saving us, that argument feels way too pie in the sky for me. So much of that future hinges on one single company in one of the most volatile places on earth, TSMC in Taiwan. That one company is both the crown jewel of the modern world and its most glaring Achilles’ heel. Any project or economic model that relies so heavily on that single point of failure is not a serious plan, it is a fantasy.

  • Abolish the BLS Jobs Report

    There’s a compelling argument that the government’s method of mass counting jobs serves to obscure, rather than clarify, the true composition of the labor force. The BLS itself acknowledges that its surveys likely include illegal aliens, as the system isn’t designed to identify their legal status. This aggregate approach allows for the convenient bundling of all workers, making it impossible to discern the number of jobs held by citizens versus non-citizens, including undocumented workers or those on temporary visas. A system of transparent, individual company reporting would bring immediate clarity. If companies were responsible for reporting their own hiring data, any significant reliance on non-citizen labor would be far more apparent, holding both the companies and policymakers accountable for the real-world effects of immigration and labor policies.

    The monthly BLS jobs report is an obsolete and harmful system that should be abolished. Its monthly release is a recurring trap for retail investors, who are systematically disadvantaged by high-frequency trading algorithms that instantly trade on the numbers before the public can react (you’re literally at work and they’re gaming you). This turns a supposedly transparent economic indicator into a tool for institutional players to profit from manufactured volatility.

    Furthermore, the data itself is often unreliable, with significant upward or downward revisions frequently undermining the accuracy of the initial reports that cause these market shocks.

    Fundamentally, a free country should not rely on the government to be the central arbiter of economic information. This mass counting of jobs is an overstep of its role. Instead, we should foster a system where companies report their own data, allowing for a more organic and less centralized flow of information. This would end the monthly market convulsions and restore a measure of fairness for the individual investor.

  • Trump’s Intel Bailout: An “America First” Scam

    The recent $10 billion government investment in Intel is a sham disguised as an “America First” initiative. In reality, it’s a bailout to service the company’s massive debt, which was approximately $50.15 billion as of March 2025. This raises the question: is President Trump getting some kind of kickback for orchestrating this deal? The claim of putting America first is further undermined by Intel’s continued reliance on Taiwan’s TSMC, a move that prioritizes Taiwan and raises concerns about the prominence of the English language in our own tech sector.

    It’s laughable that a company like Intel, supposedly at the forefront of American innovation, has a market value of around $107 billion, while an entertainment app like TikTok’s parent company, ByteDance, is valued at over $330 billion. This entire situation smacks of corruption, especially since they refuse to release the Oval Office tapes from the meeting between Trump and Intel’s CEO. With the administration also planning to reinterpret treaties to sell heavy attack drones, it’s only a matter of time before Intel’s overseas supply chains face retaliatory attacks. This isn’t a serious investment; it’s a high-risk gamble with taxpayer money that seems destined to fail.

    https://wccftech.com/intel-will-use-tsmc-forever-says-cfo-as-shares-rise-after-he-confirms-plan-to-use-us-funding-to-pay-back-debt

    https://archive.is/RTObf

  • Threads’ Gag Order

    Threads’ stringent 500-character limit for posts is a deliberate method to stifle detailed conversation, forcing users to either oversimplify their points or use other cumbersome methods, effectively burying nuanced arguments. This is yet another shady, digital “gotcha” from Mark Zuckerberg, who has a history of manipulating public discourse. We saw this clearly during the COVID-19 pandemic when he complied with government pressure to censor content, including humor, satire, and criticism of vaccines, a decision he now claims to regret. By controlling how much and what we can say, he manipulates the narrative and favors simplistic, spam-like content that aligns with a specific agenda.

  • The Algorithmic Assault on My Health

    Algorithms that ignore user preferences are having a crippling effect on my health. For instance, despite repeatedly indicating my disinterest, my feed is inundated with John Bolton stories about the FBI. This digital hostility is a significant challenge to my ability to start a family, and I refuse to let it succeed.

    This isn’t confined to the Internet; it’s a reflection of a disturbing reality I’ve witnessed firsthand in New York City. There, I’ve seen people openly advocate for ideologies promoting the subjugation and demographic displacement of white people, using dehumanizing language like “inbred” and blaming them for all of society’s problems. To me, this is a clear push for eugenics and racial persecution. I believe this is symptomatic of a historically violent leftist movement that now seeks to instigate an Islamic Communist revolution.

    Furthermore, these platforms create a facade of civic engagement. Trying to communicate with public officials is a useless exercise, as they never provide a receipt or any acknowledgment that they’ve even received the f****** message. It’s a one-way street designed to absorb dissent without action.

  • The FBI and CDC: Mandated for Chaos

    I believe the fundamental mandates of the FBI and the CDC are not to foster business or stability, but to create a form of chaos. We see this in the political antics from both sides that surround these agencies, which makes me think they’ve become redundant. We are already served by the National Guard, state and local police, and U.S. Marshals. These organizations are business-minded and have a deep understanding of the communities they protect. The FBI, in my view, has gone rogue.

    I know enough about how the USA is supposed to operate to see that if things were running correctly, the FBI wouldn’t even be needed. Think about it: we have the TSA for travel security and other agencies for our borders. I can maybe understand the need for the CIA to handle international threats, but the FBI’s domestic role seems to have devolved. I believe the FBI alone has the power to throw us into a recession and can literally tank the whole country’s economy. In that sense, they are more powerful than even the Federal Reserve, which is supposed to manage economic stability. You just have to look at the political turmoil they get involved in. The Wikileaks situation in 2016 with Hillary Clinton and Seth Rich, the drama around John Bolton—these events show an agency enmeshed in politics, not justice.

    And it’s not just the FBI. The CDC operates in a similar fashion, creating chaos under the guise of public health. Their handling of COVID-19 with constantly changing and conflicting data was a disaster that hurt businesses and families. That’s why I think what Bobby Kennedy is doing now is so important. He’s trying to fire them all, and they deserve it. He has defended the firings at the CDC, citing what he views as their failures during the pandemic. Kennedy has said that the people at the CDC who “put masks on our children, who closed our schools, are the people who will be leaving.” I believe these changes are necessary to restore trust in an agency that lost its way.

    This all feeds into a larger, scarier picture. We humans live a short life, and we’re watching our national debt run wild with no real strategies to fix it. The tariffs are a nice idea, but they aren’t part of a coherent plan. Then you have some Republicans, who I call the “chaos caucus”—figures like MTG and Massie—who just seem to create chaotic headlines. It’s a frightening time, and I am surprised that no president seems to see how rogue agencies like the FBI and CDC are at the center of this storm, capable of causing immense economic and social damage.