LinkedIn is giving Musk and Paxton special protection from hardcore criticism. I think it has to do with… they don’t want any Infidel like me pointing out they both allowed MASS illegal immigration. Same with Abbott. LinkedIn says they errored in removing my posts criticizing Musk and Paxton. It is a show of force against me, an Infidel. So I’m deactivating my LI, they are big time fraudsters manipulating the entire American birthrate. It’s a cyber warfare operation Musk is clearly running across the Internet with botnets.

My political support generally currently lies with JD Vance, Kristi Noem, Sarah Huckabee Sanders, Tom Cotton, Tulsi Gabbard, Katie Britt, Mike Huckabee, and Robert F. Kennedy Jr.

On the other hand, I am not aligned with Donald Trump Jr., Josh Hawley, Rand Paul, Liz Cheney, Matt Gaetz, Lee Zeldin, Tucker Carlson, Eric Trump, Candace Owens, or Mark Cuban.

This document provides a critical forensic analysis of Opendoor Technologies Inc. (OPEN). It applies a skeptical framework to investigate the company’s “Opendoor 2.0” pivot.

This investigation concludes that Opendoor Technologies Inc. exhibits credible and documented indicators of potential fraud.

The findings reveal a high-risk entity. Its public narratives of an “AI-first” transformation are starkly contradicted by its financial realities. This narrative is also contradicted by a documented history of regulatory sanctions for the very claims it is now repeating.

This investigation deconstructs the company’s claims to identify significant, unaddressed red flags.

Executive Summary: Key Findings and Red Flag Assessment

This investigation provides a forensic financial analysis of Opendoor Technologies Inc. (OPEN). It applies a skeptical framework to identify potential indicators of financial, engineering, or marketing fraud.

The analysis reveals a high-risk profile. This profile is characterized by a profound decoupling between the company’s public narrative and its documented financial and legal realities.

The primary thesis is that Opendoor’s 2025 strategic pivot is a near-identical repetition of its past failed claims. This pivot, branded “Opendoor 2.0,” is centered on “refounding” as an “AI-first” company.¹ These are the exact technological and marketing claims that previously resulted in significant regulatory and legal sanction.

Specifically, the company’s prior algorithmic claims led to two major penalties:

• A $62 million fine from the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) for deceptive consumer practices.³
• A $39 million settlement with investors for misleading claims about its algorithm’s efficacy and reliability.⁵

Opendoor is deploying this “Opendoor 2.0” narrative against a backdrop of accelerating financial distress. The company promotes a “path to profitability”.¹ However, its Q3 2025 financial results directly contradict this narrative.

• Revenue collapsed 34% year-over-year to $915 million.⁷
• Net losses deepened to $90 million, from $78 million in the prior-year quarter.⁹

Meanwhile, the company’s stock has exhibited parabolic “meme stock” volatility.¹⁰ This includes a 944% surge in three months ¹², which is fundamentally disconnected from its financial reality.

The September 2025 leadership change appears to be a single, coordinated event of sophisticated narrative management.¹³ This event installed a new CEO and returned co-founders Keith Rabois and Eric Wu. This leadership change also included a $40 million insider-led private investment in public equity (PIPE).¹³

This event was not designed to address the failing core business. It was designed to restore a “founder DNA” story ¹¹ and fuel speculative interest.

The investigation concludes that there are credible and documented indicators of potential fraud. This is defined by a pattern of repeating previously-debunked claims to the public and investors, all while the company’s operational and financial fundamentals deteriorate.