Doomscroll News

  • Five Hidden Red Flags That Signal a Corporate Collapse

    The landscape of American commerce is littered with the ghosts of giants that once seemed invincible. Names like Circuit City evoke a recent memory of sprawling stores that went from market leaders to liquidation sales with startling speed. While it’s easy to see the collapse in hindsight, the more pressing question is whether the warning signs were visible all along.

    The answer is often a resounding yes, but the most potent signals of deep corporate trouble are rarely found in splashy headlines. Instead, they are hidden in a modern playbook for corporate decay: one that prioritizes aggressive financial engineering over operational health, enabled by respected legal structures and rewarded by profoundly misaligned executive incentives. This article uncovers five of these overlooked red flags—buried in SEC filings, academic research, and strategic blunders—that can signal a company is on a dangerously unsustainable path.

    1. When a Company’s Value Dips Below Zero

    One of the most alarming yet surprisingly common signals is Negative Shareholders’ Equity (NSE). In simple terms, this occurs when a company’s total liabilities—everything it owes—exceed its total assets, or everything it owns. It is a classic sign of severe financial distress, indicating that if the company liquidated all its assets to pay its debts, shareholders would be left with nothing.

    While one might assume this condition is reserved for obscure, failing businesses, a surprising number of household names operate with negative shareholder equity. Recent financial analyses reveal this list includes retailers like Lowe’s, coffee behemoth Starbucks, tech giant HP Inc., and personal care brand Bath & Body Works. This trend is particularly acute in certain industries. The “Home Improvement Retail” sector, for instance, which includes giants like Lowe’s, carries a staggering average Debt-to-Equity ratio of 44.17, showcasing an industry-wide addiction to the kind of debt-fueled share buybacks that hollow out a company’s financial foundation.

    (more…)

  • Heretical Histories

    For millennia, our history has been guided by a set of foundational stories—tales of miracles, prophets, and divine encounters that we’ve been told are sacred and unchangeable. But what if those texts are hiding a different story? A story of extreme weather events mistaken for miracles, of UFO sightings recorded as divine visions, and of humanity’s own origins being part of a cosmic experiment.

    Doomscroll Dispatch
    Doomscroll Dispatch
    Heretical Histories
    Loading
    /

  • Gods, Aliens, or Wind? Decoding the Secrets of Ancient Texts

    For centuries, ancient texts and Biblical stories have been viewed as foundational narratives, their meanings often considered fixed and unchangeable. But beneath the surface of these well-known tales lies a hidden universe of alternative interpretations, a fascinating world where divine miracles meet scientific models and mystical visions are re-examined as shocking whistleblower claims. This article delves into that world, exploring five of the most surprising and counter-intuitive theories that challenge everything we thought we knew about our oldest stories. From meteorological phenomena to claims of alien genetic engineering, these ideas force us to look at foundational narratives in an entirely new light.

    1. The Parting of the Red Sea: An Act of God, or a Gust of Wind?

    The story is one of the most iconic in history: Moses, leading the Israelites, stretches out his staff as the Egyptian army closes in, and God parts the Red Sea, allowing his people to cross on dry land before the waters crash down on their pursuers. For millennia, it has stood as the definitive example of a divine miracle.

    However, researchers at the National Centre for Atmospheric Research (NCAR) and the University of Colorado (CU) have proposed a scientific explanation. Using computer modeling, they demonstrated how a phenomenon known as “wind setdown” could replicate the event. Their model suggests that a strong, steady 63-mph east wind blowing overnight across a specific, shallow coastal lagoon in the Nile delta could have pushed the water back, creating a dry land bridge for approximately four hours.

    Remarkably, this scientific model aligns perfectly with a key detail from the biblical book of Exodus, which explicitly mentions a “strong east wind” blowing through the night. This reframes one of history’s greatest miracles not as an act of divine intervention, but as a case of being in precisely the right place for an unimaginably extreme weather event.

    (more…)

  • From FDA Milestone to Bankruptcy Auction: Three Shocking Lessons from the Lucira Health Saga

    During the COVID-19 pandemic, the at-home medical test went from a niche product to a household staple. With a quick swab, we gained the confidence to visit family or board a plane. At the forefront of this revolution was Lucira Health, the company that developed the very first at-home COVID-19 test authorized by the FDA.

    Lucira was a pioneer, a symbol of rapid innovation when the world needed it most. Yet its story took a shocking turn. How could a company that achieved a historic public health milestone collapse into bankruptcy almost overnight? The saga of Lucira Health offers a series of stunning lessons about the harsh realities that exist between a breakthrough idea and market success.

    1. You Can Get Landmark Approval and Go Bankrupt in the Same Week

    Lucira Health’s collapse unfolded with the brutal irony of a Greek tragedy. On February 22, 2023, the company officially filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection. It seemed like the end of the road for the struggling diagnostics firm.

    Then, just two days later, on February 24, 2023, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) issued an Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) for Lucira’s most ambitious product yet: the first-ever over-the-counter test that could detect and differentiate between COVID-19 and Influenza A/B from a single sample. The approval was hailed as a monumental achievement.

    “Today’s authorization of the first OTC test that can detect Influenza A and B, along with SARS-CoV-2, is a major milestone in bringing greater consumer access to diagnostic tests that can be performed entirely at home.” — Jeff Shuren, M.D., J.D., director of the FDA’s Center for Devices and Radiological Health.

    So, how could a company achieve a “major milestone” while simultaneously going bankrupt? The answer lies in a perfect storm of regulatory delays and high-stakes financing.

    • Lucira’s Explanation: The company stated that the “protracted EUA process” for the combination test was incredibly costly, draining its resources and forcing it into bankruptcy before the approval finally came through.
    • The FDA’s Response: Officials countered that the delay was necessary. An early version of the test submitted by Lucira allegedly contained a “toxic substance” that made it unsuitable for home use. After a redesign, a subsequent version lacked sufficient clinical data to assess its performance, causing further delays.
    • The Hidden Condition: The final blow was a critical, undisclosed term in Lucira’s loan agreement with Silicon Valley Bank. The agreement reportedly required Lucira to secure FDA approval for its combo test by a specific deadline. Missing that deadline triggered a massive interest rate hike that made the company’s financial situation untenable.
    (more…)

  • Sold to the Second-Highest Bidder

    We unravel the story of Lucira Health. From its meteoric rise during the pandemic and a $153 million IPO, to a dramatic bankruptcy auction where pharmaceutical giant Pfizer acquired the company for just $36.4 million, and the final, quiet decision less than two years later to shut it all down. It’s a story that reveals just how quickly a pandemic hero can become a cautionary tale.

    Doomscroll Dispatch
    Doomscroll Dispatch
    Sold to the Second-Highest Bidder
    Loading
    /

  • The “Good” Buyback vs. the “Bad” Buyback

    Imagine a successful company like Apple. It generates enormous amounts of free cash flow, far more than it needs to run its business and invest in future growth. It uses this excess profit to buy back its own shares. This reduces the number of shares outstanding, which increases Earnings Per Share (EPS) and the ownership stake of the remaining shareholders. In this scenario, shareholder equity remains robust and positive because it is constantly being replenished by massive retained earnings.

    Now, consider a company with stagnant growth, inconsistent profits, or a struggling business model. To make its financial ratios look better and to prop up its stock price, the management might decide to buy back shares. But where does the money come from if not from excess profits? It often comes from taking on new debt or draining cash reserves that are needed for operations and innovation.

    This is the “bad” buyback. The company isn’t creating new value; it’s using leverage to manipulate its financial appearance. On the balance sheet (Assets = Liabilities + Equity), liabilities (debt) go up, and assets (cash) go down to pay for the shares. This combination aggressively eats away at the equity portion of the equation. When a company buys back so many shares that the cost exceeds its retained earnings and initial capital, shareholder equity flips to negative. It means the company’s liabilities now exceed its assets, a state of technical insolvency.

    Even more concerning, is when a company does both buybacks and dilutions (selling new shares). This is a major red flag. It’s like a frantic attempt to tread water: they sell new shares to raise needed cash (diluting your ownership), and then use cash (often borrowed) to buy back other shares to support the stock price. This financial churn suggests a lack of a coherent long-term strategy, prioritizing short-term stock performance over fundamental business health.

  • “lies, damned lies, and statistics.”

    The origin of the phrase is murky

    1. Mark Twain (1906) – The Popularizer

    The phrase owes its global fame almost entirely to Mark Twain. He included it in his work, Chapters from My Autobiography, first published in the North American Review in 1906. Crucially, he did not take credit for it.

    • Publication: Chapters from My Autobiography
    • Date: 1906-1907
    • Context: Twain wrote, “The remark attributed to Disraeli would often apply with justice and force: ‘There are three kinds of lies: lies, damned lies, and statistics.’”
    • Significance: This is the reference that cemented the quote in the public consciousness, especially in the United States. It also created the widespread but incorrect belief that Disraeli was the author.

    2. Benjamin Disraeli – The Mythical Source

    Despite Twain’s claim, there is no direct, verifiable record of Benjamin Disraeli (who died in 1881) ever saying or writing the phrase. The attribution is considered apocryphal. Historians and quote researchers have scoured his extensive letters, speeches, and records without finding it. The attribution likely stuck because Disraeli was known for his sharp wit and cynical political commentary.

    3. Leonard H. Courtney (1895) – The Earliest Verifiable Public Use

    The earliest confirmed public use of a very similar phrase comes from Leonard H. Courtney, a British politician and statistician.

    • Event: Speech given on August 20, 1895, in Saratoga Springs, New York.
    • Publication: His speech was later printed in the Journal of the Royal Statistical Society (Vol. 58, No. 4, December 1895).
    • Context: Courtney was discussing the difficulty of getting accurate data. He said a wise person had remarked that arguments progress through three stages: “lies—damned lies—and statistics.”
    • Significance: This is the strongest claim for the first major public appearance of the phrase, though even Courtney attributes it to an anonymous “wise person.”

    4. Earlier Whispers and Potential Influences (pre-1895)

    The phrase was likely part of a developing sentiment of statistical skepticism in Victorian England. Several other figures are linked to it in letters and journals from around the same time, suggesting it may have been a piece of conversational wit before it was formally published.

    • Sir Charles Dilke (Attributed): A British politician. In a diary entry from 1897, M.E. Grant Duff recalled that Dilke was fond of the saying and possibly used it as early as the 1870s, though this is a secondhand account written years later.
    • Anonymous Letter (1891): A letter published in the British journal National Observer in November 1891 uses the phrase “falsehoods, damned falsehoods, and statistics,” which is extremely close to the final version.
    • Thomas Carlyle: While not a direct source, the Scottish philosopher and writer (a contemporary of Disraeli) famously derided economics as “the dismal science” and expressed profound distrust for the growing reliance on statistics to understand human affairs, which may have created the intellectual climate for the saying to emerge.