Doomscroll News

Tag: influence

  • Architects of Influence: A Comparative Analysis of the Empires and Philosophies of Donald Trump and Marc Benioff

    Introduction: Two Paradigms of American Capitalism

    This report conducts a deep comparative analysis of two titans of American business: Donald Trump and Marc Benioff. They represent divergent yet potentially converging models of power and influence.

    Donald Trump is the master of the brand-as-asset. His empire is built on the symbolic, monetized value of his name. He cultivated this brand through decades of real estate development and media saturation.¹ His philosophy is one of combative transactionalism. He views the world as a zero-sum arena of winners and losers.²

    In contrast, Marc Benioff emerged as the champion of the platform-as-ecosystem. He built his empire on the functional indispensability of his enterprise software.³ He also publicly espoused a philosophy of “Stakeholder Capitalism,” which posits that business should serve the interests of society at large.⁴

    This analysis is not a static comparison. It is an examination of a dynamic and strategically significant shift.

    The Central Argument

    This report’s central argument is that corporate ideology is ultimately subordinate to pragmatic business imperatives and political expediency. This holds true even when an ideology has been meticulously cultivated over decades.

    Marc Benioff’s recent actions demonstrate this principle. His progressive persona has apparently dissolved. This is marked by his endorsement of Donald Trump and his adoption of authoritarian “law-and-order” stances.⁵

    This shift reveals the transactional nature of political alliances in modern American business. It also exposes the potential fragility of “Stakeholder Capitalism” as a core principle. The philosophy can function as a strategic posture, abandoned when it conflicts with the primacy of shareholder value in a volatile era.

    Part I: The Architectonics of Empire – Blueprints for Dominance

    This section provides a detailed, comparative analysis of the business models of the Trump Organization and Salesforce. It traces their evolution from inception to their current state.

    The two empires reveal fundamentally different approaches to capital, risk, and the nature of a modern business enterprise. One is built on tangible assets and symbolic value. The other is built on intangible code and functional utility.

    Comparative Business Milestones

    The following timeline highlights key milestones in the careers of Donald Trump and Marc Benioff. This helps contextualize the development of their respective empires.

    YearDonald TrumpMarc Benioff / Salesforce
    1968Begins career at his father’s real estate company.⁶
    1971Takes control of the family business, renaming it the Trump Organization.⁷
    1978Orchestrates first major Manhattan deal with the Grand Hyatt Hotel.⁶
    1983Completes construction of the iconic Trump Tower.⁸
    1986Joins Oracle Corporation after graduating from USC.⁹
    1987Publishes The Art of the Deal.⁸
    1990Opens the $1.1 billion Trump Taj Mahal casino in Atlantic City.⁶Becomes Oracle’s youngest-ever Vice President.⁹
    1991First of six business bankruptcies begins with the Trump Taj Mahal.¹⁰
    1999Founds Salesforce in a San Francisco apartment.¹¹
    2004The Apprentice reality TV show debuts, boosting his brand’s value.¹Salesforce goes public, raising $110 million.¹²
    2009Salesforce reaches $1 billion in annual revenue.¹²
    2020Salesforce acquires Slack for $27.7 billion.¹¹
    2024Salesforce introduces Agentforce, its enterprise AI platform.¹³
    (more…)
  • An Unmitigated Threat: The National Security Case for the Prohibition of TikTok in the United States

    An Unmitigated Threat: The National Security Case for the Prohibition of TikTok in the United States

    David’s Note: This article was substantially revised on October 10, 2025 to incorporate new research and provide a more comprehensive analysis.

    With over 170 million users in the United States, TikTok is more than a social media phenomenon; it is a deeply embedded component of American digital life and commerce.1 This ubiquity, however, masks a critical vulnerability. This report presents a comprehensive analysis of the national security threat posed by the social media application TikTok, operated by its parent company, ByteDance Ltd. It argues that due to ByteDance’s inextricable links to the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), the application functions as a dual-threat vector for sophisticated data espionage and algorithmic influence operations against the United States.

    Executive Summary

    This report analyzes the national security threat from TikTok, an application operated by ByteDance Ltd. The company’s deep connections to the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) allow the app to function as a tool for data espionage and algorithmic influence against the United States.

    This report’s central thesis is that mitigation efforts cannot neutralize this threat. The application’s core architecture, corporate governance, and legal obligations are inextricably linked to the CCP, a designated foreign adversary. Therefore, a complete prohibition on its operation within the United States is the only effective policy solution.

    The report deconstructs ByteDance’s opaque corporate structure. It highlights the CCP’s control mechanisms, such as the “golden share” held by a state-backed entity, which make any claims of operational independence untenable. It also details warnings from top U.S. intelligence officials, including the FBI Director and the Director of National Intelligence, who define TikTok as a tool that a foreign adversary can leverage.

    Furthermore, the report dismisses mitigation efforts like the $1.5 billion “Project Texas” as flawed security theater. Evidence shows this project failed to sever data flows to Beijing or neutralize the threat of algorithmic manipulation. The core issue of adversarial ownership remained unaddressed.

    After refuting key counterarguments—related to the First Amendment, economic impacts, and false equivalencies with U.S. tech firms—the report concludes that partial measures are insufficient. The unique nature of the threat, rooted in ByteDance’s subservience to the CCP, demands a structural solution. The only policy that fully addresses these inherent risks is the swift enforcement of a ban on TikTok and any successor applications, as provided by the Protecting Americans from Foreign Adversary Controlled Applications Act (PAFACA).

    (more…)