Doomscroll News

Tag: History

  • From Mandela’s Ghost Flight to Fravor’s Ghost Ship: A Journey Through the Fog of Information

    From Mandela’s Ghost Flight to Fravor’s Ghost Ship: A Journey Through the Fog of Information

    How much of what you read online can you actually trust? A deep dive into one seemingly simple fact shows just how unreliable our modern information ecosystem is: the details of Nelson Mandela’s 1990 U.S. tour. We navigated past a simplistic AI answer and a vague Wikipedia entry to find the real story buried in a 30-year-old newspaper. This journey highlights a critical problem that information on platforms like Wikipedia can be scrubbed, leaving no trace. When basic history is this murky, and official sources are discussing UFOs, it fundamentally changes our relationship with the truth.

    The fabric of our shared reality is more fragile than we think. Consider the logo for Fruit of the Loom; many people vividly recall a cornucopia, a horn of plenty, nestled among the fruit. Yet, the company asserts it was never there. This is a prime example of the Mandela Effect, a phenomenon of collective false memory that has been a subject of online fascination for over a decade. The term was coined around 2009 by paranormal researcher Fiona Broome after discovering that she, along with many others, shared a distinct but incorrect memory of Nelson Mandela dying in prison in the 1980s. In reality, Mandela was released from prison in 1990 and passed away in 2013.

    This divergence between memory and recorded history extends beyond logos and historical figures. A recent exploration of Nelson Mandela’s 1990 U.S. tour provides a compelling case study in the subtle distortions of fact. An inquiry to an AI assistant might yield a very specific, yet incomplete, detail: “During his historic 1990 U.S. tour, Nelson Mandela’s organizers chartered a Boeing 727 from the Trump Shuttle for a flight from Boston to New York.” A broader search on Wikipedia reveals a more ambiguous statement: “Trump Shuttle conducted some charter operations around this time… In June 1990, the airline carried Nelson Mandela on his eight-city tour of the United States.” The vagueness of “carried on his tour” leaves room for misinterpretation.

    It is only through digging into primary sources, such as a Los Angeles Times article from June 25, 1990, that the granular, verified truth emerges. The article explicitly states: “Mandela and the approximately 80 people traveling with him arrived here Sunday in a Trump Shuttle 727 and will take the same plane on the rest of the tour… Organizers are paying $130,000 to charter the plane.” This journey from a simplistic AI response and a vague Wikipedia entry to a detailed primary source highlights the unsettling nature of how we consume and accept information as factual.

    (more…)
  • ‪Can Electors Go Rogue? The “Faithless Elector”‬

    ‪Can Electors Go Rogue? The “Faithless Elector”‬

    An elector can vote against the popular vote of their state. This is known as being a “faithless elector.” Historically, however, this has been rare and has never changed the outcome of a presidential election.

    Who are the electors? They are chosen by the political parties in each state. They are often party loyalists, chosen to recognize their service.

    Are there rules against it? Yes, many states have laws that require electors to vote for the candidate they are pledged to. The Supreme Court has upheld these laws, allowing states to penalize or replace faithless electors. As of 2024, 38 states and D.C. have such laws.

    (more…)
  • Federal Reserve Notes vs. United States Notes

    Federal Reserve Notes vs. United States Notes

    United States Notes differed from the later Federal Reserve Notes primarily in their issuing authority and initial backing.

    How United States Notes Initially Worked: United States Notes were first authorized by the First Legal Tender Act in 1862 during the Civil War. They were issued directly by the U.S. Treasury to pay for war expenses and other government obligations. This meant the government itself was putting this money into circulation, essentially as a “bill of credit,” without involving lending or borrowing from a central bank. Initially, these notes, popularly known as “greenbacks,” were a form of fiat currency, meaning their value was based on government decree rather than being backed by a specific commodity like gold or silver that could be redeemed on demand. However, later, some United States Notes were redeemable for precious metal after the specie resumption of 1879. The early notes carried an obligation stating they were legal tender for all debts, public and private, except for duties on imports and interest on the public debt.

    A Silver Certificate
    (more…)
  • One Faith, Many Strands: Congregational Power, Dissent & Protestant Evolution

    One Faith, Many Strands: Congregational Power, Dissent & Protestant Evolution

    The lived religious experience and societal role of 18th-century New England Congregationalism were different from the landscape of modern Protestantism.

    To begin, in 18th-century Massachusetts, where Congregationalism was the established church (meaning it was supported by public taxes and held a privileged position), two prominent examples of “dissenting groups” would be:

    1. Baptists: Key Difference from Congregationalists: Baptists rejected infant baptism, believing that baptism should only be for conscious believers who could make a personal profession of faith. They also strongly advocated for the separation of church and state and religious liberty for all, opposing the system of mandatory taxes to support the Congregational church. Status: They were a growing minority and often faced social and legal pressure, including being taxed for the support of Congregational ministers even if they didn’t attend those churches (though some exemptions were starting to be made by the mid-18th century, they were often hard-won).
    2. Quakers (Religious Society of Friends): Key Difference from Congregationalists: Quakers had radically different beliefs and practices. They believed in the “Inner Light” (direct, personal experience of God without the need for ordained clergy or formal sacraments), practiced pacifism (refusing to bear arms), refused to swear oaths, and had plain forms of worship, often involving silent waiting. Status: Historically, Quakers had faced severe persecution in Massachusetts in the 17th century (including banishment and execution). By the 18th century, the overt violence had ceased, but they remained a distinct and often marginalized group, facing difficulties due to their pacifism (e.g., during wartime) and their refusal to pay taxes for the established church or participate in other civic rituals that conflicted with their beliefs.

    These groups, along with Anglicans (who were a minority in New England though established in England), represented significant religious alternatives to the dominant Congregationalist establishment and played important roles in the long struggle for greater religious freedom in America.

    (more…)

  • Before RussiaGate: Unanswered 9/11 Questions & the Figures Who Later Targeted Trump

    The official 9/11 story has always been shadowed by intense political maneuvering and questions about the integrity of the investigation. TDS figures involved Robert Mueller and Jeff Sessions then became central to later political firestorms, like the Trump-Russia probe, leading critics to question if patterns of bias or “sketchy” behavior were present from the start. Add the chaos of the post-9/11 Anthrax attacks targeting leaders like Sen. Tom Daschle, and you have an environment ripe for suspicion. Here are the really interesting, specific questions that remain, viewed through that critical lens:

    Questions About the Investigation’s Integrity & Key Players:

    1. The Mueller FBI’s Actions: Robert Mueller led the FBI during 9/11 and its immediate aftermath. Considering his later controversial role heading the Trump-Russia investigation (labeled the “Russia Hoax” by critics), specific questions about his FBI’s handling of 9/11 gain new scrutiny for some observers: Why did the Phoenix Memo warning die within his FBI? Why was the WTC steel evidence removed and disposed of so quickly under his FBI’s jurisdiction? What were the full findings and actions taken regarding the Saudi flights authorized post-9/11? How effectively was the Anthrax investigation (targeting Sen. Daschle) handled by his FBI, and were its ultimate conclusions fully verified?
    2. The Zelikow Conflict & Commission Bias: How could the 9/11 Commission claim independence when its director, Philip Zelikow, had such tight links to the Bush White House (Condoleezza Rice), as highlighted in 2004 reports (CNN)? Did this connection, slammed by critics at the time, effectively allow the White House to steer the investigation?
    3. Political Pressure & Information Control: Were findings, like the “28 pages” on potential Saudi links, kept secret for years due to political pressure (perhaps involving figures like Jeff Sessions in his Senate role then, whose later actions as AG raised questions for critics) rather than legitimate security concerns? Did the White House improperly limit the Commission’s access or scope, as alleged during the 2004 hearings (CNN)?
    (more…)