Tag: Economy

  • The Art of the Missile

    I have a hunch about something I call ‘the art of the missile,’ and it makes me question if tariffs alone are a durable solution to our debt. It’s a feeling that we are underestimating how fragile our entire economic system is in the face of modern warfare tactics.

    My concern is that the strength of tariffs depends entirely on a functioning economy with intact infrastructure like ports, power grids, and manufacturing hubs. What happens to the power of those tariffs when the Axis of Evil decides to use a few well placed Zircon cruise missiles or a swarm of advanced drones? They have these weapons stockpiled and ready to mobilize. If Putin or another adversary starts shooting, not necessarily at people, but at our critical economic infrastructure, the entire tariff structure could collapse overnight. Your solution to the debt would be gone in an instant.

    Beyond that direct military threat, you cannot deny there seems to be a significant media cover up suggesting things are not what they seem on the world stage. How do we explain the reports where Ukrainians and their helpers conveniently evacuate a key area right before it gets hit, or when the Russians do the same thing before a major strike on one of their important targets? It points to a level of coordination or information control hidden from the public. It all feels managed, especially when you see players like JP Morgan lining up with Biden to talk about rebuilding everything afterward. It suggests the conflict itself is just a phase in a larger economic plan for the global elite.

    This is why when people bring up other solutions, like AI and technological dominance saving us, that argument feels way too pie in the sky for me. So much of that future hinges on one single company in one of the most volatile places on earth, TSMC in Taiwan. That one company is both the crown jewel of the modern world and its most glaring Achilles’ heel. Any project or economic model that relies so heavily on that single point of failure is not a serious plan, it is a fantasy.

  • Abolish the BLS Jobs Report

    There’s a compelling argument that the government’s method of mass counting jobs serves to obscure, rather than clarify, the true composition of the labor force. The BLS itself acknowledges that its surveys likely include illegal aliens, as the system isn’t designed to identify their legal status. This aggregate approach allows for the convenient bundling of all workers, making it impossible to discern the number of jobs held by citizens versus non-citizens, including undocumented workers or those on temporary visas. A system of transparent, individual company reporting would bring immediate clarity. If companies were responsible for reporting their own hiring data, any significant reliance on non-citizen labor would be far more apparent, holding both the companies and policymakers accountable for the real-world effects of immigration and labor policies.

    The monthly BLS jobs report is an obsolete and harmful system that should be abolished. Its monthly release is a recurring trap for retail investors, who are systematically disadvantaged by high-frequency trading algorithms that instantly trade on the numbers before the public can react (you’re literally at work and they’re gaming you). This turns a supposedly transparent economic indicator into a tool for institutional players to profit from manufactured volatility.

    Furthermore, the data itself is often unreliable, with significant upward or downward revisions frequently undermining the accuracy of the initial reports that cause these market shocks.

    Fundamentally, a free country should not rely on the government to be the central arbiter of economic information. This mass counting of jobs is an overstep of its role. Instead, we should foster a system where companies report their own data, allowing for a more organic and less centralized flow of information. This would end the monthly market convulsions and restore a measure of fairness for the individual investor.

  • Trump’s Intel Bailout: An “America First” Scam

    The recent $10 billion government investment in Intel is a sham disguised as an “America First” initiative. In reality, it’s a bailout to service the company’s massive debt, which was approximately $50.15 billion as of March 2025. This raises the question: is President Trump getting some kind of kickback for orchestrating this deal? The claim of putting America first is further undermined by Intel’s continued reliance on Taiwan’s TSMC, a move that prioritizes Taiwan and raises concerns about the prominence of the English language in our own tech sector.

    It’s laughable that a company like Intel, supposedly at the forefront of American innovation, has a market value of around $107 billion, while an entertainment app like TikTok’s parent company, ByteDance, is valued at over $330 billion. This entire situation smacks of corruption, especially since they refuse to release the Oval Office tapes from the meeting between Trump and Intel’s CEO. With the administration also planning to reinterpret treaties to sell heavy attack drones, it’s only a matter of time before Intel’s overseas supply chains face retaliatory attacks. This isn’t a serious investment; it’s a high-risk gamble with taxpayer money that seems destined to fail.

    https://wccftech.com/intel-will-use-tsmc-forever-says-cfo-as-shares-rise-after-he-confirms-plan-to-use-us-funding-to-pay-back-debt

    https://archive.is/RTObf

  • The FBI and CDC: Mandated for Chaos

    I believe the fundamental mandates of the FBI and the CDC are not to foster business or stability, but to create a form of chaos. We see this in the political antics from both sides that surround these agencies, which makes me think they’ve become redundant. We are already served by the National Guard, state and local police, and U.S. Marshals. These organizations are business-minded and have a deep understanding of the communities they protect. The FBI, in my view, has gone rogue.

    I know enough about how the USA is supposed to operate to see that if things were running correctly, the FBI wouldn’t even be needed. Think about it: we have the TSA for travel security and other agencies for our borders. I can maybe understand the need for the CIA to handle international threats, but the FBI’s domestic role seems to have devolved. I believe the FBI alone has the power to throw us into a recession and can literally tank the whole country’s economy. In that sense, they are more powerful than even the Federal Reserve, which is supposed to manage economic stability. You just have to look at the political turmoil they get involved in. The Wikileaks situation in 2016 with Hillary Clinton and Seth Rich, the drama around John Bolton—these events show an agency enmeshed in politics, not justice.

    And it’s not just the FBI. The CDC operates in a similar fashion, creating chaos under the guise of public health. Their handling of COVID-19 with constantly changing and conflicting data was a disaster that hurt businesses and families. That’s why I think what Bobby Kennedy is doing now is so important. He’s trying to fire them all, and they deserve it. He has defended the firings at the CDC, citing what he views as their failures during the pandemic. Kennedy has said that the people at the CDC who “put masks on our children, who closed our schools, are the people who will be leaving.” I believe these changes are necessary to restore trust in an agency that lost its way.

    This all feeds into a larger, scarier picture. We humans live a short life, and we’re watching our national debt run wild with no real strategies to fix it. The tariffs are a nice idea, but they aren’t part of a coherent plan. Then you have some Republicans, who I call the “chaos caucus”—figures like MTG and Massie—who just seem to create chaotic headlines. It’s a frightening time, and I am surprised that no president seems to see how rogue agencies like the FBI and CDC are at the center of this storm, capable of causing immense economic and social damage.

  • Satoshi’s $140 Billion Ghost: The ‘Made in China’ Problem with Crypto’s Gold Rush

    On one side, you have the absolute control of the Federal Reserve system, which can de-bank citizens for protesting government mandates. Take the Canadian truckers who opposed COVID-19 vaccine requirements, whether it was the failed Johnson & Johnson shot they pulled, Russia’s Sputnik V, or China’s Sinovac. On the other side, you have the equally ridiculous, sketchy reality of today’s cryptocurrency, where the entire system is deeply flawed.

    Arguably the biggest problem is the ghost founder. Even now, in September 2025, no one has a clue who Satoshi Nakamoto is. This anonymous creator is sitting on a wallet containing an estimated 1.1 million bitcoins that has never been touched. Depending on the market’s wild swings, that stash is worth somewhere between $125 billion and $140 billion. This isn’t some quaint mystery; it’s a ticking time bomb at the heart of the ecosystem. This single, unknown entity holds enough power to crash the entire market with a single transaction, making a mockery of the whole idea of “decentralization.”

    This fundamental flaw is matched by a very tangible problem: the centralization of power in the hardware. It’s a modern gold rush, but the only company selling the shovels and axes, the ASIC miners, is China. Their near-total dominance over manufacturing creates a massive vulnerability that directly impacts the individual prospectors.

    YouTuber VoskCoin provides a perfect case study of this broken system. Despite a huge following with sponsors and YouTube revenue, he has still spent probably hundreds of thousands of dollars to build his “family farmer” crypto operation, and he has documented the shady practices of Chinese ASIC manufacturers. He points out that miners ordered from China frequently arrive with no warranty, and there’s widespread suspicion that manufacturers “pre-mine” on the machines, selling them to the public only after their most profitable days are over. Many of these high powered ASICs require specialized immersion cooling fluid to operate, but using it often voids the warranty you likely never had in the first place. He has also warned his followers about rug pulls in the ASIC minable coin space, like the situation around Alephium (ALPH), where new miners are hyped up and then fail to deliver.

    The financial and operational risks for an independent miner are astronomical. VoskCoin has shared electricity bills as high as $18,000 and recently suffered a catastrophic lightning strike that wiped out a huge chunk of his mining capacity. He attributes the failure to his own self-admitted ignorance in not ensuring the proper grounding was installed, a costly mistake in this high-stakes environment. This harsh reality starkly contrasts with the industrial scale mega operations, like the one connected to Hut 8, that have corporate backing.

    This exposes the raw truth of the crypto dream for the average person. It’s a field where the essential hardware is controlled by foreign companies with questionable ethics, and all the risk is pushed onto individuals. It’s unclear under what authority a president could reveal Satoshi Nakamoto’s identity, but perhaps that level of shock is exactly what’s needed to force a national conversation about the sketchy foundations of the whole system. We have to find a path that balances financial privacy with the clear and present dangers of a system so heavily dominated by a single foreign power. Let’s just hope the final solution isn’t also “Made in China.”

  • Tariffs for Stimulus Checks: The Winning Formula Democrats Don’t Understand

    The Democrat worldview, fixated on outdated economic dogma, stands as a direct impediment to American prosperity in the AI era. Their response to every new opportunity is a tired chorus of recycled criticisms, stale arguments, and unimaginative calls for more debt. It’s time to dismantle their flawed logic and embrace a forward-looking economic plan that puts American ingenuity and the American people first.

    Stimulus Checks: Fueling Innovation, Not Inflation

    Let’s start with the core of the plan: sending stimulus checks to the American people, funded by the massive influx of new tariff revenue. Predictably, the old guard cries “inflation, bad investment, and boom-bust” cycles. This thinking is completely out of touch with the reality of the modern American economy.

    This is the era of AI. Individual “Mom and Pop” investors, and even tech-savvy teenagers, are smarter and more connected than ever. The money from a stimulus check isn’t just disappearing into a black hole; it’s circulating, it’s being invested, it’s fueling small businesses, and it’s driving innovation from the ground up.

    The United States of America needs to “double down” on creativity. We are collecting hundreds of billions of dollars annually from President Trump’s 2025 tariffs, a massive windfall. To suggest this extra revenue should just be used to “directly pay down the debt” is not just boring, it’s uncreative, and frankly, un-American. Our nation thrives on dynamism, not just fiscal austerity. This tariff revenue is a direct windfall, earned by putting our nation first, and it should be returned to the American people as stimulus checks to ignite a new wave of entrepreneurship and consumption. The notion that this creates only “bad investment” shows a profound lack of faith in the American people’s ability to make smart decisions.

    The Delusion of “Free Association” in Global Trade

    This brings us to the source of this revenue: tariffs. Democrats cling to a naive fantasy of “free trade,” arguing that it allows “humans to freely associate” in the global marketplace. This completely ignores the brutal realities of international competition and thousands of years of human history, which are driven by power and self-interest.

    Go watch or read Frank Herbert’s “Dune.” In that universe, the Great Houses of the Imperium each possessed their own family atomics (nuclear weapons hidden away). While their use against humans was forbidden, the existence of those weapons shaped every single interaction. The Atreides, for instance, had a cache of atomics on Arrakis; they knew they could obliterate the very spice production that powered the galaxy if they chose. The point is, there was no true “free association” among the Great Houses because each had instruments of immense power held in reserve.

    To suggest that nations like China, with their state-subsidized industries and strategic market manipulation, are engaging in “free association” is equally delusional. They operate with the equivalent of “family atomics” in their economic arsenal. Our tariffs are not about hindering association; they are about imposing a real-world cost on their predatory practices and defending American industries, ensuring our (the United States of America’s) economic security and strength.

    The Real Tax Burdens: Income and Corporate Taxes

    The Democrat fixation on certain taxes is a masterclass in misdirection. They ignore the real drags on our economy. The federal income tax, for example, does far more to “discourage capital formation and savings” than any other tax. President Trump has rightly targeted this, stating his intention on a tarmac around April 27, 2025, to seek “no income tax Federal that is for those making $200,000 or less a year.” That’s a bold vision to free up the vast majority of American households. He’s already shown his commitment with “The Bill,” which effectively eliminated the federal income tax on Social Security for most seniors.

    Likewise, corporate income taxes are a first-order, direct punishment on businesses, making American companies less competitive. This is a real “disincentive to productivity.” Furthermore, let’s not forget the huge excise taxes on highway-related activities and air travel, particularly in what are essentially Democrat-run city-states like California and New York. These taxes directly increase the cost of doing business and kill growth.

    Capital Gains: A Necessary Guard Against Speculation

    Finally, let’s dismantle their primary attack: the ludicrous claim that a capital gains tax “stops productivity.” This argument is completely backward. The capital gains tax, particularly its distinction between short-term and long-term gains, is a crucial governor against rampant, destabilizing speculation.

    We live in the era of “Flash Boys,” the term coined by author Michael Lewis, where high-frequency trading can create incredible market volatility. A robust capital gains framework, which taxes short-term trades at a higher rate, tempers the kind of reckless gambles that produce little real value. The preferential treatment for long-term gains is a strategic incentive for patient, productive investment, the very definition of capital formation. To dismantle this system would be to open the floodgates to massive foreign entities who would flood our tech incubators with speculative cash, creating artificial bubbles and blowing out genuine American innovators. We need the capital gains tax on paper assets to protect our competitive edge.

    The choice is clear. We can cling to the tired, failed economic theories of the Democrat worldview, or we can embrace a bold, creative, and uniquely American path. Tariff revenue should empower the American people through stimulus checks, fueling innovation, not just vanish into the bureaucracy of debt repayment. Let’s trust our investors, our innovators, and our creative spirit.

  • The Phoenix Plan: A Blueprint for American Rebirth

    The Phoenix Plan: A Blueprint for American Rebirth

    Prioritize national strength, economic independence, and internal order.

    Core Principles

    • Competent Government: Before voting on any bill, members of Congress must have one week to read it and pass a test to prove they understand it.
    • “Fortress America” Economy: The plan aims for a self-reliant economy. This includes:
      • Taxes: Making current individual tax rates permanent while eliminating special-interest loopholes, the Child Tax Credit, and complex corporate taxes.
      • Trade and Investment: Using tariffs to protect critical industries and offering residency to foreigners who make multi-million dollar investments in the U.S.
      • Ending Corporate Crime: Forcing companies to be specific about how they use investor money. Seized assets from convicted executives and banks will fund their own prosecution and imprisonment.
      • Nationalizing Crypto: Making all private cryptocurrency transactions illegal. The entire crypto system will be seized and reserved as a financial weapon for the military to use only during a declared war.
      • Honest Money: Transitioning away from the Federal Reserve to a system where the U.S. Treasury issues debt-free money directly.
    (more…)