Doomscroll News

Tag: censorship

  • A Global Network Analysis of Connectivity, Control, and the Future of the Internet

    Executive Summary

    This analysis uses a standardized suite of network diagnostic tools to conduct a global reconnaissance of the internet. It reveals a digital world that is rapidly fragmenting.

    The core argument is that the “Splinternet” is not a future possibility. It is a present and accelerating reality.¹ This term describes the division of the internet into distinct, often isolated national or regional enclaves.²

    To map this landscape, the report first establishes a baseline of an open and efficient network in the Netherlands. It then systematically explores the diverse architectures of internet control worldwide.

    This report categorizes the findings into distinct archetypes that illustrate this fragmentation.

    • The “Walled Gardens” of nations like China and North Korea operate state-controlled intranets.³
    • The “Curated Web” of countries like Russia and Turkey employs sophisticated filtering and politically-motivated routing.⁴
    • The “Developing Web” across Africa and South America has connectivity shaped by infrastructural deficits and post-colonial legacies.⁵
    • The “Free Web” of the EU and US, while open, is fragmented by complex regulations, commercial interests, and internal digital divides.⁶

    The investigation concludes that a digital archipelago is supplanting the foundational concept of a single, borderless internet.⁷ This trend is poised to intensify. The advent of state-aligned satellite constellations and AI-powered censorship will fundamentally reshape global communication, commerce, and geopolitics.

    (more…)

  • The X Paradox: An Analysis of Platform Governance, User Safety, and Inauthentic Activity Under Elon Musk

    Executive Summary

    This report analyzes the social media platform X under Elon Musk’s ownership. It examines the profound shifts in governance, user safety, and core architecture.

    The central argument is that these changes have created the ‘X Paradox.’ The platform champions ‘free speech’ but creates a hostile environment that silences many users. It promotes ‘authenticity,’ yet its systems fail to stop inauthentic activity and often penalize genuine users.

    The analysis details several key issues:

    • Inconsistent Policies: Rules for world leaders are applied inconsistently.
    • Eroding Trust: A monetized verification system has damaged user trust.
    • Bot Proliferation: Automated accounts persist, degrading the user experience and manipulating political discourse.
    • Declining Safety: Hate speech has measurably increased while content moderation has collapsed. This disproportionately impacts women and marginalized communities.
    • Opaque Appeals: The process for appealing suspensions is frustrating and lacks transparency.

    The report concludes that this transformation is not an accident. It is the successful implementation of a new, permissive philosophy that externalizes the cost of safety onto its users.

    (more…)

  • Threads’ Gag Order

    Threads’ stringent 500-character limit for posts is a deliberate method to stifle detailed conversation, forcing users to either oversimplify their points or use other cumbersome methods, effectively burying nuanced arguments. This is yet another shady, digital “gotcha” from Mark Zuckerberg, who has a history of manipulating public discourse. We saw this clearly during the COVID-19 pandemic when he complied with government pressure to censor content, including humor, satire, and criticism of vaccines, a decision he now claims to regret. By controlling how much and what we can say, he manipulates the narrative and favors simplistic, spam-like content that aligns with a specific agenda.

  • The TikTok Paradox: National Security, Digital Sovereignty, and the Forging of U.S. Tech Policy

    David’s Note: This article was substantially revised on October 10, 2025 to incorporate new research and provide a more comprehensive analysis.

    On January 17, 2025, the U.S. Supreme Court upheld a landmark law that forces the sale of TikTok, a platform used by over 170 million Americans, or face a nationwide ban.1 This decision highlighted a central paradox in modern American policy. TikTok is at once a legislative target, condemned as a grave national security threat, and an indispensable campaign tool, actively leveraged by the political actors who seek to regulate it.

    This paper argues that this apparent contradiction is not a sign of policy incoherence. Instead, it reveals an evolving and deliberate strategy to confront a novel threat to the nation’s digital sovereignty. Digital sovereignty is a nation’s ability to control its own digital destiny—the data, hardware, and software it relies upon.3 In this context, it means securing the digital infrastructure and information environment within its borders from the control of a strategic adversary.4

    The core of this argument is that the threat posed by TikTok is fundamentally structural. It is rooted in the legal and operational subordination of its parent company, ByteDance, to the government of the People’s Republic of China (PRC). This structural risk is distinct from the commercial data practices of domestic social media companies. It has compelled the U.S. to forge a new national security doctrine for the digital age.

    To develop this thesis, this paper will proceed in four parts.

    • Section I will establish that TikTok represents a structural national security threat due to its data collection capabilities under PRC law and its potential for algorithmic manipulation.
    • Section II will trace the evolution of U.S. legal strategy, from the failure of broad executive orders to the crafting of a targeted, constitutionally-sound legislative solution.
    • Section III will systematically deconstruct the primary counterarguments against this policy, including those based on the First Amendment, economic disruption, and false equivalencies with U.S. tech firms.
    • Section IV will analyze the political realities that create the central paradox, examining how electoral pragmatism and divided public opinion coexist with the national security consensus.

    Ultimately, this analysis will demonstrate that the TikTok dilemma is a landmark case in how a liberal democracy is adapting its legal and political tools to defend its sovereignty in an era of weaponized information.

    (more…)
  • An Unmitigated Threat: The National Security Case for the Prohibition of TikTok in the United States

    An Unmitigated Threat: The National Security Case for the Prohibition of TikTok in the United States

    David’s Note: This article was substantially revised on October 10, 2025 to incorporate new research and provide a more comprehensive analysis.

    With over 170 million users in the United States, TikTok is more than a social media phenomenon; it is a deeply embedded component of American digital life and commerce.1 This ubiquity, however, masks a critical vulnerability. This report presents a comprehensive analysis of the national security threat posed by the social media application TikTok, operated by its parent company, ByteDance Ltd. It argues that due to ByteDance’s inextricable links to the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), the application functions as a dual-threat vector for sophisticated data espionage and algorithmic influence operations against the United States.

    Executive Summary

    This report analyzes the national security threat from TikTok, an application operated by ByteDance Ltd. The company’s deep connections to the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) allow the app to function as a tool for data espionage and algorithmic influence against the United States.

    This report’s central thesis is that mitigation efforts cannot neutralize this threat. The application’s core architecture, corporate governance, and legal obligations are inextricably linked to the CCP, a designated foreign adversary. Therefore, a complete prohibition on its operation within the United States is the only effective policy solution.

    The report deconstructs ByteDance’s opaque corporate structure. It highlights the CCP’s control mechanisms, such as the “golden share” held by a state-backed entity, which make any claims of operational independence untenable. It also details warnings from top U.S. intelligence officials, including the FBI Director and the Director of National Intelligence, who define TikTok as a tool that a foreign adversary can leverage.

    Furthermore, the report dismisses mitigation efforts like the $1.5 billion “Project Texas” as flawed security theater. Evidence shows this project failed to sever data flows to Beijing or neutralize the threat of algorithmic manipulation. The core issue of adversarial ownership remained unaddressed.

    After refuting key counterarguments—related to the First Amendment, economic impacts, and false equivalencies with U.S. tech firms—the report concludes that partial measures are insufficient. The unique nature of the threat, rooted in ByteDance’s subservience to the CCP, demands a structural solution. The only policy that fully addresses these inherent risks is the swift enforcement of a ban on TikTok and any successor applications, as provided by the Protecting Americans from Foreign Adversary Controlled Applications Act (PAFACA).

    (more…)