Deconstructing the Crypto Market Collapse of October 10, 2025

On October 10, 2025, a single geopolitical announcement triggered the largest deleveraging event in the history of digital assets, exposing the fragile, overleveraged core of a euphoric market. This was not just a market crash; it was a Black Swan event that stress-tested the entire crypto ecosystem, revealing its deepest vulnerabilities and its surprising strengths.

Executive Summary

The cryptocurrency market was shattered on Friday, October 10, 2025, by what appeared to be a singular geopolitical shock. In reality, it was the catastrophic failure of a market structure defined by extreme leverage and paradoxical sentiment. This historic deleveraging event, the largest in the history of digital assets, demonstrated the profound systemic risks that had built up beneath a surface of bullish euphoria.

President Donald Trump’s announcement of 100% tariffs on China was the undeniable catalyst. However, this report will show that the collapse resulted from a dangerous confluence of factors. The market was primed for volatility by a widely accepted “debasement trade” narrative, where a US government shutdown was ironically seen as a tailwind for asset prices. This perception led to all-time highs for Bitcoin and an unprecedented buildup of speculative, leveraged long positions.

The tariff announcement acted as a pinprick to this overleveraged bubble, triggering a violent liquidation cascade that erased between $9.5 billion and $19 billion from derivatives markets in 24 hours.¹³, ¹⁹ On-chain analysis reveals that the decentralized derivatives exchange Hyperliquid was the primary venue for this deleveraging.¹³ Furthermore, forensic evidence points to the strategic actions of sophisticated whale traders who not only anticipated the market’s vulnerability but also positioned themselves to profit immensely from the chaos.², ¹² This suggests the event was both a market-wide panic and a predatory hunt.

The analysis concludes with an assessment of the market’s structural health in the aftermath, identifying key indicators that will define its trajectory and offering a forward-looking perspective for navigating the new paradigm.

1. The Calm Before the Storm: A Market Primed for Volatility

In the days before October 10, 2025, the digital asset market was defined by a potent but deceptive bullish sentiment. A prevailing macroeconomic narrative convinced many that prices would continue to rise, driving major cryptocurrencies to record highs. Beneath this euphoric surface, however, on-chain data revealed a market stretched to its breaking point. It was laden with excessive leverage and ripe for a violent correction.

1.1. The “Debasement Trade” Narrative: Government Shutdown Fuels All-Time Highs

The primary driver of market optimism in early October was the ongoing US government shutdown, which began around October 1, 2025.³ ,¹²² Counterintuitively, market participants saw this sign of political dysfunction as a powerful bullish catalyst. The prevailing thesis was the “debasement trade,” which argued that a prolonged shutdown would force more fiscal stimulus and accommodative monetary policy from the Federal Reserve.³ This would, in turn, devalue the US dollar, prompting investors to move capital into hard assets like Bitcoin and gold.

This narrative was clearly reflected in asset prices. Both Bitcoin and gold surged to new all-time highs in the first week of October. Bitcoin broke past the $125,000 mark, while gold futures climbed above $3,950 per troy ounce.³, ³⁷, ¹⁰⁴, ¹²² This synchronized rally indicated a broad rotation into assets believed to offer protection against currency devaluation.¹²² Strong institutional demand, evidenced by large inflows into US-listed spot Bitcoin ETFs, further bolstered this sentiment.⁴⁸, ⁷⁵, ⁸⁴ The market was operating under a clear thesis: government dysfunction was bullish for Bitcoin.

1.2. On-Chain Forensics: The Hidden Fragility Beneath the Euphoria

While price action suggested a healthy market, on-chain data revealed a dangerous fragility. The bullish narrative had encouraged rampant speculation and an extreme buildup of leverage. This left the market acutely vulnerable to a sudden shock.

A Glassnode market report published on October 8, just two days before the crash, provided a stark warning. Titled “The Uptober Breakout,” the analysis noted that while spot market signals were constructive, there was **”rising leverage and crowded call positioning suggesting growing short-term fragility.”**³⁷

Several key metrics quantified this fragility:

Extreme Profitability: The report highlighted that approximately 97% of the circulating Bitcoin supply was in a state of unrealized profit.³, ⁷⁵ Such elevated levels historically increase the likelihood of profit-taking and often precede sharp corrections.
Derivatives Market Overheating: The rally was accompanied by a sharp expansion in derivatives activity. Open interest in perpetual futures contracts soared, and funding rates turned strongly positive.³⁷ This indicated that a flood of traders, likely “late longs,” were entering the market with high leverage, creating a precarious structure susceptible to a long squeeze.

The “debasement trade” narrative that propelled the market to new heights was also the instrument of its undoing. It created a powerful consensus that attracted a flood of speculative, highly leveraged capital. The government shutdown was not a conflicting narrative; it was the direct cause of the market’s vulnerability. The tariff announcement was merely the spark. This created a reality where healthy institutional spot buying masked the systemic danger building in the derivatives markets, setting the stage for a catastrophic deleveraging. In essence, the market’s euphoric rally had built a structure so fragile that it was not a question of if it would break, but what would break it.

2. The Tariff Shockwave: The Geopolitical Catalyst and its Cross-Asset Impact

The overleveraged cryptocurrency market needed only a powerful external shock to collapse. That shock arrived on Friday, October 10, with a dramatic escalation in the US-China trade war. President Trump’s announcement was a sweeping declaration of economic hostility that sent immediate and violent shockwaves across global asset classes.

2.1. A Tit-for-Tat Escalation: From Rare Earths to Sweeping Tariffs

The catalyst for the market collapse was a direct retaliation by the Trump administration. On October 9, China’s Ministry of Commerce expanded its export controls on rare earth minerals and related technologies.²⁷, ⁷³ The move was widely seen as a geopolitical power play by Beijing. The Trump administration described it as an “extraordinarily aggressive” and “hostile” act.⁷³, ⁷⁶, ¹⁰⁰

The US response was swift. On Friday, October 10, President Trump announced a series of punitive measures set to take effect on November 1, 2025²⁷, ⁷⁶:

A 100% Tariff: A new 100% tariff would be imposed on all goods imported from China, **in addition to any tariffs they are currently paying.**¹¹, ¹²
Software Export Controls: The announcement included new “export controls on any and all critical software” originating from the United States.¹⁹, ¹⁰²

President Trump also publicly questioned a planned meeting with Chinese President Xi Jinping, signaling a deep freeze in diplomatic relations.⁶⁰, ⁷⁶, ⁹⁵ While he later suggested the tariffs could be reversed, the immediate message was one of severe conflict.¹⁰⁰, ¹⁰⁶

The “critical software” clause was a potent source of fear. The crypto ecosystem is built on software, much of it open-source. A vaguely defined US policy restricting software exports introduced a new, unquantifiable risk. This ambiguity could affect everything from blockchain protocols to global exchanges, prompting a “sell first, ask questions later” response from investors.

2.2. A Global “Risk-Off” Cascade: No Asset Was Spared

The market’s reaction was immediate and brutal, extending far beyond cryptocurrencies. The announcement triggered a classic “risk-off” cascade across global finance as investors fled to traditional safe havens.

Equities: Global stock markets tumbled. In the US, the S&P 500 fell over 2.7%, while the tech-heavy Nasdaq Composite plummeted 3.5%.⁶⁰, ⁶¹ Crypto-related stocks like Coinbase (COIN) and Robinhood (HOOD) fell by more than 5-7%.¹¹⁴
Commodities: Fears of a global economic slowdown sent oil prices sharply lower.⁵, ⁶⁰
Safe Havens: Capital poured into US Treasuries and gold, assets perceived as insulated from global growth shocks.⁵, ⁶⁰

This cross-asset reaction is critical because it contextualizes the crypto crash. The events of October 10 shattered the narrative of Bitcoin as a “safe-haven asset.” When faced with a genuine macroeconomic crisis, capital flowed out of crypto and into traditional havens. The crash provided a real-world stress test. It confirmed that cryptocurrency behaves as a high-beta risk asset, highly correlated with the Nasdaq and other technology investments.⁹⁹ The tariff announcement, therefore, was not just another headline; it was a systemic shock that instantly re-categorized digital assets as high-risk investments in the eyes of the global market.

3. The Great Unwinding: Anatomy of the Record-Breaking Liquidation Cascade

The tariff announcement was the spark, but the market’s overleveraged structure was the explosive powder. The initial price drop triggered a self-reinforcing cascade of forced liquidations in the derivatives market. This transformed a significant sell-off into the largest deleveraging event in the history of digital assets.

3.1. The Domino Effect: How Leverage Fueled the Collapse

The core of the crash occurred within the perpetual futures market. These instruments allow traders to use significant leverage, amplifying their exposure. Before October 10, the market was overwhelmingly dominated by leveraged long positions.⁷¹, ⁹⁸

When the tariff news broke, falling prices triggered margin calls. Traders who could not post more collateral had their positions forcibly sold by exchanges. This process, known as a liquidation, created a massive wave of sell orders. This sudden selling pressure pushed prices down further, triggering more margin calls for other traders. This feedback loop—where liquidations cause lower prices, which cause more liquidations—is a liquidation cascade.⁵¹, ⁶⁴

Market experts were clear in their assessment. Vincent Liu of Kronos Research stated the rout was “sparked by US-China tariff fears, but fuelled by institutional over-leverage“.⁵, ⁸² David Jeong of Tread.fi called the event a “black swan,” noting that the 24/7 nature of perpetual futures amplified the losses.⁵, ⁸²

3.2. Quantifying the Carnage: A Historic Deleveraging

The scale of the forced deleveraging was staggering. Data from various analytics platforms paints a clear picture of historic market carnage. The most intense phase occurred within a single hour on Friday, when over $7 billion in leveraged positions were closed.⁵, ⁶⁰, ¹¹⁰, ¹¹⁹, ¹²⁰, ¹²⁵ Across a 24-hour window, total liquidations ranged from $9.55 billion to over $19.3 billion.⁷¹, ⁷⁴, ⁸², ⁹⁸ This affected more than 1.6 million trading accounts globally, making it the largest single-day liquidation event in crypto history.⁵, ¹⁹, ⁷⁴, ⁸², ¹¹⁵

The following table consolidates the key liquidation metrics reported across multiple sources, providing a comprehensive overview of the event’s magnitude.

Metric	Value	Source
Total Liquidations (24hr)	$9.55 billion – $19.3 billion	¹⁹, ⁶¹, ⁷¹, ⁹⁸
Peak 1-Hour Liquidations	~$7 billion	⁵, ⁶⁰, ¹¹⁰, ¹¹⁵
Total Traders Liquidated	~1.6 million	⁵, ¹⁹, ⁶¹, ⁷⁴
Long Position Liquidations	~$8 billion – $16.7 billion	⁶¹, ⁷¹, ⁹⁸
Short Position Liquidations	~$1.55 billion – $2.46 billion	⁶¹, ⁷¹, ⁹⁸

The data confirms the market’s one-sided positioning. Long positions accounted for the vast majority of the carnage, reflecting the extreme bullish consensus built on the “debasement trade” narrative.⁶¹, ⁷¹

While major assets saw the largest absolute liquidations, the price impact on altcoins was far more severe. The single hour of peak panic on October 10 served as a “stress test” that revealed the relative resilience of major assets. During this window, losses varied dramatically, with Bitcoin falling only 4% while others saw much steeper drops: Ethereum (-11.2%), Solana (-18.8%), BNB (-25.7%), Dogecoin (-31.6%), and XRP (-36.8%).⁸¹, ¹¹⁸

Digital Asset	24hr Liquidation Value (USD)	Price Decline (%)	Source
Bitcoin (BTC)	$1.37 billion – $5.32 billion	~8-12%	⁶¹, ⁷¹, ⁹⁸
Ethereum (ETH)	$1.26 billion – $4.38 billion	~13-17%	⁶⁰, ⁶¹, ⁷¹
XRP	~$708 million	~22-30%	²⁵, ⁶⁰, ⁹³
Solana (SOL)	~$2.01 billion	~3% (initial report)	²⁵, ¹¹⁴
Dogecoin (DOGE)	Data not available	>30%	⁶⁰
Binance Coin (BNB)	Data not available	~6.6%	¹⁹, ⁹³

3.3. Systemic Stress: Exchange Outages Magnify the Panic

The chaos was compounded by the failure of critical market infrastructure. As volatility surged, several of the world’s largest centralized exchanges experienced significant technical issues.

Binance, the world’s largest crypto exchange, faced widespread outrage. Users reported frozen accounts, failed stop-loss orders, and severe “flash crashes” on certain altcoin pairs.¹¹⁰, ¹¹⁹ While Binance attributed the disruption to “heavy market activity,” critics alleged the outages worsened the crash.¹¹⁰, ¹¹⁹ Similar issues were also reported by users of Coinbase and Robinhood.¹¹⁰, ¹¹⁹

The distribution of these liquidations across trading venues, however, reveals the true epicenter of speculative risk.

Trading Venue	Liquidation Volume (24hr, USD)	Market Share (%)	Source
Hyperliquid	$10.3 billion	~53.3%	¹³, ⁴⁰, ⁶⁶
Bybit	$4.6 billion	~23.8%	¹³, ⁴⁰, ⁶⁶
Binance	$2.4 billion	~12.4%	¹³, ⁴⁰, ⁶⁶
HTX	Largest single liquidation ($87.53M)	Not specified	⁷¹, ⁹⁸

The data revealed a profound fact: Hyperliquid, a decentralized perpetuals exchange, was the undisputed leader in liquidations. It processed more than four times the volume of Binance. This demonstrates a significant market shift. The most extreme, high-risk speculative leverage had migrated away from regulated, centralized giants. It moved into the more capital-efficient and permissionless world of DeFi. This great unwinding was a brutal but clear demonstration of how speculative leverage had migrated to the decentralized frontier, creating a new and potent source of systemic risk.

4. The Architects of the Crash: On-Chain Analysis of Key Whale Activity

The historic liquidation cascade was not an impersonal market event. It was shaped and accelerated by the deliberate actions of large, sophisticated traders. On-chain analysis provides compelling evidence that certain “whales” anticipated the market’s vulnerability. They strategically positioned themselves to profit from the chaos, suggesting the event was both a panic and a predatory hunt.

4.1. Case Study 1: The “Satoshi-Era” Whale’s $200 Million Profit on Hyperliquid

The most compelling evidence of strategic positioning comes from a single, sophisticated trader on Hyperliquid. On-chain intelligence firms, most notably Lookonchain and analyst Maartunn, tracked a wallet associated with a “Bitcoin OG” whose holdings dated back to 2011.², ¹², ⁵² This entity executed a massive and perfectly timed short trade on the platform that became the epicenter of the liquidations.

The Setup: The operation began on October 8th. The entity transferred tens of millions of USDC stablecoins into Hyperliquid. They used this collateral to build an enormous leveraged short position across Bitcoin and Ethereum, totaling over $1.1 billion in notional value.², ¹²
The Trade: The positions included a ~$753 million short on Bitcoin (10x leverage) and a ~$353 million short on Ethereum (12x leverage).¹²
The Profit: As the tariff news hit and the cascade began, the value of these shorts skyrocketed. According to analyst @mlmabc, the whale closed most of their positions near the bottom of the price wick. They realized a staggering profit estimated between $190 million and $200 million in a single day.¹²
A Pattern of Savvy Trading: This was not an isolated event. The same whale had a documented history of astute market timing, having sold large portions of their Bitcoin near market tops in both August and early October 2025.², ¹²

The whale’s actions were not passive. By establishing such a large short position on the most over-leveraged venue, they added significant selling pressure that accelerated the price decline. The liquidations of other traders’ long positions provided the massive downward price movement. This also created the liquidity necessary for the whale to exit their own trade at a maximum profit.

4.2. Case Study 2: The Suspicious “$88 Million Trade” and Calls for Investigation

Beyond the well-documented ‘Satoshi-era’ whale, another highly profitable short trade raised community suspicions of insider trading.

According to crypto analyst Vivek Sen, a trader opened a large Bitcoin short position just 30 minutes before President Trump’s tariff announcement.⁴⁶ The account used was reportedly created on the same day, a major red flag for manipulative trading.⁷, ²⁹ Using a brand-new, anonymous account for a single, large, and perfectly timed trade is a classic tactic to obscure the trader’s identity and avoid linking the activity to any previous market behavior, often raising suspicions of trading on non-public information. The trader then closed the position during the crash for an estimated profit of $88 million.⁷, ²⁹, ⁴⁶

The seemingly prescient timing prompted a public call for scrutiny from John Deaton, a prominent pro-crypto attorney. Deaton reposted the details, stating, “If true, this needs to be investigated,” which amplified speculation about potential insider trading.⁷, ³¹, ⁴⁶

4.3. Case Study 3: Institutional Selling Pressure

Adding to the volatility, reports surfaced of significant institutional selling that coincided with the crash. On October 10, a transaction attributed to BlackRock involved the sale of approximately $972 million worth of Bitcoin, a move that fueled market volatility and contributed to the $597 million in liquidations that followed.⁶² While the motivations for such a large sale are not public, its timing added significant supply to an already panicked market.

4.4. The Broader Ecosystem: Pre-Existing Distribution and Weakened Structure

These predatory short trades exploited a market already weakened by sustained selling pressure from other large holders. In the weeks prior, on-chain data revealed that XRP whales, for instance, had been consistently offloading an average of $50 million worth of XRP every day.⁶, ²⁶, ¹¹⁶, ¹²⁴ This steady selling pressure absorbed buy-side liquidity and weakened market depth. As a result, XRP and other altcoins became more susceptible to a sharp, cascading decline when the macroeconomic shock finally arrived.

The on-chain evidence thus transforms the narrative from a simple market panic into a story of a calculated, predatory hunt that accelerated the collapse.

5. Aftermath and Forward Outlook (As of October 12, 2025)

The liquidation event of October 10-11 left the market shattered, with total cryptocurrency market capitalization falling from a record of over $4 trillion to $3.7 trillion.¹⁰⁸ Two days later, the market remains in a state of fragile stability, with investors assessing the damage and analysts debating the path forward.

5.1 The Market Two Days Later: A Fragile Stability

As of October 12, the market continues to show signs of weakness. Bitcoin is trading around $111,000, down over 10% for the week, while Ethereum hovers near $3,800.¹⁰⁸ The broader crypto market fell another 0.89% in the 24 hours leading into October 12, extending a seven-day decline of 11.5%.¹⁰⁸

Trading volumes have fallen sharply, down over 45% for Bitcoin and 50% for Ethereum, and open interest in derivatives has dropped 18%.¹⁰⁸ This indicates that traders have been broadly de-risking and closing positions, leading to a lower-leverage environment but also reflecting a significant lack of appetite for new risk.¹⁰⁸ The key technical level analysts are watching is the $110,000 support for Bitcoin; a failure to hold this level could invite further selling pressure.¹⁰³, ¹⁰⁸

5.2 A ‘Character Test’: Relative Resilience Among Majors

The crash and its immediate aftermath served as a “character test” for major cryptocurrencies, revealing stark differences in their resilience.⁸¹, ¹¹⁸

Strongest Performers: Bitcoin and Ethereum demonstrated the most stability. Bitcoin experienced the smallest drop during the peak crash hour (-4.0%) and recovered quickly, reinforcing its role as the market’s center of gravity. Ethereum, despite an initial 11.2% drop, showed the strongest rebound, closing the crash hour above its starting price, signaling strong dip-buying interest.⁸¹, ¹¹⁸
Weak Links: XRP and Dogecoin were the most fragile. They suffered the deepest crashes (-36.8% and -31.6%, respectively) and, while they saw large percentage bounces from the lows, the gains proved unsustainable. This performance suggests they are viewed more as short-term trading vehicles than stable long-term holdings.⁸¹, ¹¹⁸

5.3 Infrastructure Under Strain: The Binance Compensation

The extreme volatility on October 10 strained the infrastructure of centralized exchanges. On Binance, the market turmoil caused three assets within its “Binance Earn” program—USDE, BNSOL, and WBETH—to temporarily de-peg from their intended values.⁵⁵, ⁹⁶ Ethena’s USDe, for example, briefly fell to $0.66 on the platform.⁹⁶

In response to user losses caused by these system issues, Binance announced on October 12 that it had distributed approximately $283 million in compensation to affected users.⁹⁶, ¹¹³ The exchange clarified that the broader market downturn occurred before the de-pegging incidents and that compensation was for losses directly attributable to its system failures, not general market fluctuations.⁹⁶, ¹¹³

5.4 A Correction or a Collapse? The Great Debate

In the immediate aftermath, market commentators were sharply divided on whether the event was a healthy reset or a cycle-ending collapse.

The Bullish Case (A Healthy Reset): Some observers argued the event was a necessary and ultimately bullish reset. Edul Patel, CEO of Mudrex, framed the crash as a long-term buying opportunity.¹⁹, ⁹³, ⁹⁴ He pointed to historical precedent, noting that October corrections are often followed by strong rallies. He also suggested that the anticipation of new spot altcoin ETFs remains a powerful long-term tailwind.¹⁹, ⁹³ From this perspective, the flush of leverage cleansed the market of speculative excess, creating a healthier foundation for the next bull cycle.
The Bearish Case (End of the Cycle): Other experts issued far more dire warnings. Caroline Mauron, co-founder of Orbit Markets, identified the $100,000 level for Bitcoin as the critical line in the sand. A sustained break below this level, she warned, “would signal the end of the past three-year bull cycle”.⁵, ⁸² This bearish sentiment was reflected in the derivatives market. Data from the Deribit exchange showed the highest concentration of put options at the $110,000 and $100,000 strike prices, indicating traders were hedging against a deeper decline.⁵

5.5 Key Levels and Indicators to Watch

To navigate the post-crash environment, market participants must focus on a disciplined set of key indicators.

Technical Support: The $100,000 to $102,000 price zone for Bitcoin has emerged as the consensus must-hold support level. During the crash, Bitcoin’s price briefly dropped into this range before finding support.¹⁹, ⁷¹, ⁹⁸ This area represents crucial psychological and technical demand. A daily or weekly close below this zone would be a profoundly bearish signal.
On-Chain Metrics: In the coming weeks, on-chain data will be critical for gauging the market’s health. Key metrics to monitor include exchange flows (selling vs. accumulation), long-term holder behavior (accumulation vs. capitulation), and the rebuilding of derivatives open interest. As of October 12, Bitcoin is testing a “golden cross,” a bullish technical pattern that occurs when a shorter-term moving average crosses above a longer-term one, which has historically preceded strong rallies and provides a counter-signal to the bearish sentiment.⁴⁹
Macroeconomic Factors: The crypto market is now tethered to macroeconomic developments. The US-China trade relationship will be the single most important external driver. Any signs of de-escalation could spark a significant relief rally.⁷¹ Conversely, further hostile actions would likely lead to another wave of selling. Additionally, the market faces headwinds from a wave of large token unlocks scheduled for mid-October, which will increase the circulating supply of several altcoins and could create further selling pressure.⁷⁰

5.6 Strategic Considerations for the Sophisticated Investor

For professional investors, the crash has shifted the immediate focus to comprehensive risk management and the identification of strategic opportunities.

Contagion Risk Assessment: As articulated by Brian Strugats of Multicoin Capital, the immediate focus must be on “counterparty exposure and whether this triggers broader market contagion”.⁵, ¹⁹, ⁸², ⁹³, ⁹⁴ The historic losses on platforms like Hyperliquid could have created undisclosed financial distress for large trading firms or DeFi protocols. A full assessment of systemic risk is paramount.
Volatility and Downside Protection: The event was a stark reminder of the inherent volatility of digital assets. Demand for downside protection via put options surged during the crash and is likely to persist.⁵, ⁶⁰ Investors may consider reducing overall leverage until market stability is restored.
The Long-Term Thesis: For investors with conviction in long-term fundamental drivers, the crash may represent a generational buying opportunity. A core tenet of long-term value investing is the ability to accumulate fundamentally strong assets at a significant discount. This crash may provide an opportunity to buy assets like Bitcoin and Ethereum far below their recent all-time highs. The challenge lies in distinguishing a temporary panic from a fundamental, bearish paradigm shift. Ultimately, the “Black Swan” of October 10 was not just a random event but a harsh lesson in the interconnectedness of geopolitics, market structure, and speculative psychology.

Works Cited

qazinform.com. “Bitcoin and gold set new all-time highs amid U.S. government shutdown.” October 6, 2025.
The Times of India. “Bitcoin reaches all-time high, largest crypto surpasses $125,000 mark; ‘debasement trade’ spurs risk rally.” October 6, 2025.
Glassnode. “The Uptober Breakout.” insights.glassnode.com, October 8, 2025.
Galaxy Digital. “Weekly Top Stories – 10/10/25.” galaxy.com, October 10, 2025.
CoinDCX. “Crypto Bull Run 2025: Will it Continue?” coindcx.com, October 8, 2025.
Kolev, Nikolay. “Why Is Crypto Crashing: Key Reasons and One Shocking $88M Bitcoin Trade.” cryptodnes.bg, October 11, 2025.
The Economic Times. “Trump announces 100% tariffs on China ‘over and above any tariff they are currently paying’.” October 10, 2025.
Kuhn, Daniel. “Crypto market sheds $125 billion as Trump threatens more tariffs on China.” The Block, October 10, 2025.
The Indian Express. “US-China trade war escalates: Trump imposes 100 per cent tariff on Chinese imports.” October 11, 2025.
Taha, Rana. “Trump says he will impose additional 100% tariffs on China.” Deutsche Welle, October 11, 2025.
The Times of India. “US to hike China tariffs to 130%: What deadline Trump has set for banning software exports to China.” October 11, 2025.
India Today. “Trump says US will hit Chinese imports with additional 100% tariff from November.” October 11, 2025.
Business Today. “Crypto crash: $19 bn wiped out as Trump’s 100% China tariff sparks largest liquidation in history.” October 11, 2025.
Kuhn, Daniel. “Crypto liquidations near $10 billion in historic drawdown following Trump’s 100% tariffs on China.” The Block, October 10, 2025.
The Block. “Total crypto market cap tanks over 9% following Trump’s latest round of retaliatory tariffs on China.” October 10, 2025.
futunn.com. “BTC and ETH Experience Another Flash Crash! How Does It Differ from the Plunge on February 3?” October 11, 2025.
India Today. “Crypto crash wipes out $19 billion after Trump’s 100% China tariffs spark sell-off.” October 11, 2025.
South China Morning Post. “Cryptocurrency market sees record liquidations, triggered by latest Trump tariffs.” October 11, 2025.
Pineda, Julian. “Weekly Fundamental Crypto Outlook: Is Trump Affecting Market Confidence?” forex.com, October 11, 2025.
The Times of India. “Over $7 billion wiped out in 1 hour! Trump to impose 130% tariff on China; triggers crypto market sell off.” October 11, 2025.
The Nation Thailand. “Crypto Market rocked by $9.55 Billion Liquidation After Trump’s China Tariff Threat.” October 11, 2025.
U.Today. “Crypto Community in Shock as Trader Shorts Bitcoin Right Before Crash.” tradingview.com, October 11, 2025.
ForkLog. “Crypto.com CEO Urges Regulatory Scrutiny After $19 Billion Liquidations.” October 11, 2025.
NewsBTC. “Satoshi-Era Bitcoin Whale Shorted $1.1B Before Tariff News — Insider Tip?” tradingview.com, October 11, 2025.
CryptoNews. “Early Bitcoin Whale Shorted $1.1B Right Before Tariffs, Now Up $27M – How Did He Know?” tradingview.com, October 11, 2025.
The Economic Times. “XRP price warning: Is XRP going to crash? Whales sell $50 million daily as price volatility spikes.” October 10, 2025.
The Economic Times. “Crypto sees record $19 billion wipeout as Trump slaps 100% tariff on chinese tech imports.” October 11, 2025.
Zdravkov, Alexander. “Bitcoin and Crypto Market Crash and Rebound After Trump’s Tariff Shock Sparks $5B Liquidation Frenzy.” cryptodnes.bg, October 11, 2025.
The Economic Times. “XRP price warning: Is XRP going to crash? Whales sell $50 million daily as price volatility spikes.” October 10, 2025.
m.economictimes.com. “Which crypto stayed strong during one of the biggest market crashes in history? The Trump tweet on China that shook it all.” October 11, 2025.
jonathanausten.com. “Crypto Analysis Of The Crash Hour.” October 12, 2025.
markets.financialcontent.com. “Meme Coin vs. King Crypto: Bitcoin and Shiba Inu, a Clash of Investment Philosophies.” October 12, 2025.
livemint.com. “Crypto market continues to decline, Bitcoin and Ethereum in red as traders seek safe haven investments.” October 12, 2025.
m.economictimes.com. “Bitcoin crashes to $105,000 before rapid rebound; why the market plunged and what triggered the bounce.” October 11, 2025.
tradingview.com. “Binance pays $283 million in compensation following Friday’s depegs, covering user losses.” October 12, 2025.
cryptodnes.bg. “The USDe Crash: Ethena’s Algorithmic Stablecoin Tested by Market Pressure.” October 12, 2025.
tradingview.com. “Binance distributes $283M to affected users following market turmoil.” October 12, 2025.
markets.financialcontent.com. “Over $1 Billion in Altcoins Unleashed: Navigating the October 2025 Token Unlock Deluge.” October 12, 2025.