Category: Finance

  • The Unholy Alliance: Are Goldman Sachs and Apple Secretly Stockpiling Gold?

    Disclaimer: The following is a speculative theory presented for discussion only. It is not based on factual research and is not intended to be a statement of fact.

    Here’s a thought: What if Goldman Sachs’s recent bold prediction of $5,000 gold is a strategic move? They have a massive financial partnership with Apple through high-yield savings accounts. At the same time, Apple’s need for physical gold for its semiconductors is ever-increasing.

    Could Goldman be creating a public narrative to sell the idea of gold to everyday investors, while in the background, they work with Apple in a kind of “unholy alliance” to use their financial machinery to build a massive, stealth stockpile of physical gold? This would secure Apple’s future supply chain for a critical mineral, potentially leaving the average investor holding the bag. It’s a sneaking suspicion that this could be a form of financial engineering hiding in plain sight.

  • Satoshi’s $140 Billion Ghost: The ‘Made in China’ Problem with Crypto’s Gold Rush

    On one side, you have the absolute control of the Federal Reserve system, which can de-bank citizens for protesting government mandates. Take the Canadian truckers who opposed COVID-19 vaccine requirements, whether it was the failed Johnson & Johnson shot they pulled, Russia’s Sputnik V, or China’s Sinovac. On the other side, you have the equally ridiculous, sketchy reality of today’s cryptocurrency, where the entire system is deeply flawed.

    Arguably the biggest problem is the ghost founder. Even now, in September 2025, no one has a clue who Satoshi Nakamoto is. This anonymous creator is sitting on a wallet containing an estimated 1.1 million bitcoins that has never been touched. Depending on the market’s wild swings, that stash is worth somewhere between $125 billion and $140 billion. This isn’t some quaint mystery; it’s a ticking time bomb at the heart of the ecosystem. This single, unknown entity holds enough power to crash the entire market with a single transaction, making a mockery of the whole idea of “decentralization.”

    This fundamental flaw is matched by a very tangible problem: the centralization of power in the hardware. It’s a modern gold rush, but the only company selling the shovels and axes, the ASIC miners, is China. Their near-total dominance over manufacturing creates a massive vulnerability that directly impacts the individual prospectors.

    YouTuber VoskCoin provides a perfect case study of this broken system. Despite a huge following with sponsors and YouTube revenue, he has still spent probably hundreds of thousands of dollars to build his “family farmer” crypto operation, and he has documented the shady practices of Chinese ASIC manufacturers. He points out that miners ordered from China frequently arrive with no warranty, and there’s widespread suspicion that manufacturers “pre-mine” on the machines, selling them to the public only after their most profitable days are over. Many of these high powered ASICs require specialized immersion cooling fluid to operate, but using it often voids the warranty you likely never had in the first place. He has also warned his followers about rug pulls in the ASIC minable coin space, like the situation around Alephium (ALPH), where new miners are hyped up and then fail to deliver.

    The financial and operational risks for an independent miner are astronomical. VoskCoin has shared electricity bills as high as $18,000 and recently suffered a catastrophic lightning strike that wiped out a huge chunk of his mining capacity. He attributes the failure to his own self-admitted ignorance in not ensuring the proper grounding was installed, a costly mistake in this high-stakes environment. This harsh reality starkly contrasts with the industrial scale mega operations, like the one connected to Hut 8, that have corporate backing.

    This exposes the raw truth of the crypto dream for the average person. It’s a field where the essential hardware is controlled by foreign companies with questionable ethics, and all the risk is pushed onto individuals. It’s unclear under what authority a president could reveal Satoshi Nakamoto’s identity, but perhaps that level of shock is exactly what’s needed to force a national conversation about the sketchy foundations of the whole system. We have to find a path that balances financial privacy with the clear and present dangers of a system so heavily dominated by a single foreign power. Let’s just hope the final solution isn’t also “Made in China.”

  • Honey, JPM Shrunk the Collateral: Betting on Crypto ETFs Like It’s Not 2008 Anew

    Honey, JPM Shrunk the Collateral: Betting on Crypto ETFs Like It’s Not 2008 Anew

    JPMorgan Chase’s recent decision to allow trading and wealth management clients to use crypto Exchange Traded Funds (ETFs) as collateral for loans is a concerning development that introduces multiple layers of risk. This move, starting with BlackRock’s iShares Bitcoin Trust, integrates a volatile and complex asset class into traditional lending practices, which will have significant negative consequences.

    Custody and Ownership Concerns: “Not Your Keys, Not Your Crypto”

    A primary concern with crypto ETFs is the nature of ownership and custody.

    Lack of Direct Ownership: When investing in a crypto ETF, individuals do not own the underlying cryptocurrency directly (Investopedia). Instead, they own shares of a fund that holds the crypto. This means investors cannot take custody of their share of the crypto assets; they can only trade the ETF shares.

    Reliance on Custodians: Crypto ETFs depend on custodians to safeguard the underlying digital assets. This reliance introduces significant risks:

    Single Point of Failure: Crypto ETFs rely on custodians, such as Coinbase, which holds a significant percentage of Bitcoin for these ETFs. This concentration is concerning, as any major operational issue, security breach, or insolvency at the custodians will have disastrous consequences for the ETFs and their investors.

    (more…)
  • Federal Reserve Notes vs. United States Notes

    Federal Reserve Notes vs. United States Notes

    United States Notes differed from the later Federal Reserve Notes primarily in their issuing authority and initial backing.

    How United States Notes Initially Worked: United States Notes were first authorized by the First Legal Tender Act in 1862 during the Civil War. They were issued directly by the U.S. Treasury to pay for war expenses and other government obligations. This meant the government itself was putting this money into circulation, essentially as a “bill of credit,” without involving lending or borrowing from a central bank. Initially, these notes, popularly known as “greenbacks,” were a form of fiat currency, meaning their value was based on government decree rather than being backed by a specific commodity like gold or silver that could be redeemed on demand. However, later, some United States Notes were redeemable for precious metal after the specie resumption of 1879. The early notes carried an obligation stating they were legal tender for all debts, public and private, except for duties on imports and interest on the public debt.

    A Silver Certificate
    (more…)
  • Shopify & The Fentanyl Bank Rot

    Shopify & The Fentanyl Bank Rot

    TD Bank, a major Canadian financial institution potentially among Shopify’s banking partners, faces a massive scandal. In early 2024, public reports revealed that TD Bank is under U.S. federal investigation, including by the Department of Justice, for its alleged role in laundering hundreds of millions of dollars in illicit fentanyl profits and other drug money through its U.S. branches. Chinese crime groups and drug traffickers reportedly used TD to launder money from U.S. fentanyl sales. As a consequence, TD Bank pleaded guilty to conspiracy to commit money laundering and agreed to pay approximately $3 billion in a settlement. This situation stemmed from “chronic failures” in its anti-money laundering (AML) program, which allowed criminal enterprises to flourish. The Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) assessed a record $1.3 billion penalty against TD Bank for these Bank Secrecy Act violations.

    (more…)
  • Behind the Crypto Hype: Questioning Influencer Trade

    This one sucks to have to write, but given a situation that just occurred on here:

    An influencer with a substantial following showcases significant profits or frequent trading activity, such as claims of daily investments into cryptocurrencies like Ethereum. However, these assertions are difficult for followers to verify independently. A core principle in the cryptocurrency space is “not your keys, not your crypto.” This emphasizes that if your digital assets are held on an exchange or a platform controlled by others, you don’t have direct custody and true ownership of them. When trades are supposedly made by an individual within a centralized exchange (like HTX, which is a CEX), these transactions occur on the platform’s internal, private ledgers. They are not typically broadcast individually on the public blockchain for everyone to scrutinize.

    (more…)
  • Just for Fun: Urgent Recommendation to the Securities & Exchange Commission (SEC): Enhanced Specificity for Use of Proceeds Disclosures

    MEMORANDUM

    FOR: The Honorable Chair, U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

    Director, Division of Corporation Finance

    Director, Division of Enforcement

    FROM: [redacted]

    DATE: April 4, 2025

    SUBJECT: Urgent Recommendation: Enhanced Specificity for Use of Proceeds Disclosures

    1. Purpose: This memorandum recommends immediate action (rulemaking or interpretive guidance) to prohibit public companies from using vague terms like “other general corporate purposes” as the primary descriptor for the intended use of capital raised via registered direct offerings, private placements, or shelf registrations.

    2. Problem Statement & Background: Current Regulation S-K allows non-specific “general corporate purposes” disclosures. This flexibility is being exploited, contributing to significant retail investor harm. We’ve observed a troubling pattern, particularly acute during the Biden administration, where companies, especially in FDA-regulated sectors like biotech (e.g., Lucira Health, Cue Health) and other industries (e.g., Applied UV, Virgin Orbit, Rockley Photonics, Pacific Coast Oil Trust), raise substantial funds citing vague purposes shortly before collapsing into bankruptcy. This frequently results in devastating losses for individual investors (often $50,000+), while employees lose jobs.

    (more…)