An Explosion in the Heartland: The True Cost of America’s Fragile Munitions Supply Chain

Executive Summary

This analysis outlines the systemic vulnerabilities that led to the explosion and proposes concrete recommendations for policymakers, regulators, and the defense industry to prevent a future catastrophe and ensure national security.

The Company in the Woods

Long before the events of October 10th brought it into the national spotlight, Accurate Energetic Systems was a quiet but vital cog in America’s defense and industrial machinery. Founded in 1980, the company established itself as a specialized manufacturer and processor of high explosives.¹⁵ It operated from a sprawling 1,200-acre campus tucked away in the rural landscape of Bucksnort, Tennessee.¹⁵ This remote location, with its rolling hills and hollows providing natural berms, was chosen for the isolation and safety buffer required for handling highly volatile materials.¹⁵

AES is an independently owned small business that serves a surprisingly diverse clientele.¹⁵ Its primary customer is the U.S. Department of War. The company holds numerous multi-million dollar contracts to supply the Army and Navy with a range of critical energetic materials.⁹,¹⁰ Public records show contracts for everything from bulk explosives like TNT and Composition C-4 to finished munitions like landmines and small breaching charges.⁹,¹¹ A recent Department of War contract, awarded on September 23, 2025, for “$120 million for ‘the procurement of TNT,’” underscores the company’s central role in the military supply chain.¹

Beyond its military work, AES is deeply integrated into the commercial sector. Its client list includes companies in aerospace, oil and gas exploration, mining and blasting, and controlled demolition.¹⁵,¹⁶ The company’s capabilities are extensive, covering the full lifecycle of energetic materials production. Its facilities are equipped for high explosive powder processing, melt-pour casting for warheads and grenades, and fabricating specialized devices like linear shaped charges.¹⁵ AES also offers comprehensive logistical support, research and development, and testing services at its on-site outdoor range, which is capable of handling detonations of up to 35 pounds of explosives.¹⁵,¹⁷

The Bucksnort campus functions not just as a single-company operation but as a multi-tenant hub for the explosives industry. Over the years, AES has leased buildings on its property to other firms, including American Sporting Supplies and Rio Ammunition.¹,⁶ The latter was the operator of a building where a fatal explosion occurred in 2014.¹,⁶ This business model, while likely financially advantageous, introduces layers of complexity regarding safety oversight and liability across the sprawling, high-hazard campus.

While not a household name like prime defense contractors such as Lockheed Martin or Raytheon, AES occupies a foundational position in the defense industrial base. The company specializes in processing the bulk energetic materials—the essential ingredients like TNT—that larger contractors require to manufacture finished weapon systems, such as the 155mm artillery shells that are in high demand globally. This makes AES a “quiet critical” node in the supply chain.

The disruption of this single, low-profile company does not merely halt its own production. It creates a critical bottleneck that can cascade upwards, delaying the output of the entire munitions manufacturing pipeline. The explosion on October 10th was not just the failure of a factory; it was the failure of a strategic national asset. However, while AES was a strategic asset, its operational history was not without incident, revealing a deeply disturbing history of critical safety failures that predated the 2025 catastrophe.

A Pattern of Risk

The catastrophic explosion on October 10, 2025, was not an isolated incident. A troubling pattern of serious safety events and regulatory violations at the Bucksnort facility in the past decade raises significant questions about its operational culture and oversight. These prior incidents provide a crucial, troubling context for the recent disaster.

The most severe prior event occurred in April 2014. A powerful explosion in a building on the AES complex killed one worker and injured three others.⁶,¹⁸ The blast was significant enough to blow out two walls and a large portion of the roof of the building, where about 20 employees were believed to be working.¹⁹ The Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) launched an investigation immediately.

The ATF ultimately ruled the incident a non-criminal “industrial accidental explosion”.²⁰ According to preliminary findings, the blast originated in the mezzanine area of the factory, which fed a loading machine for shotgun cartridges.²⁰ At the time, officials from the Tennessee Department of Labor and Workforce Development clarified that while AES owned the property, the building itself was operated by a tenant company, Rio Ammunition.⁶ While AES was not the direct operator, this fatal event established a history of catastrophic industrial accidents at this specific location.

Five years later, in 2019, Accurate Energetic Systems faced direct regulatory action for its own safety failures. Following a referral, the Tennessee Occupational Safety and Health Administration (TOSHA) conducted an inspection (No. 1395197.015) that uncovered “serious” health violations at the plant.⁵,²¹ According to news reports based on TOSHA documents, alarming medical incidents prompted the investigation: “several employees had seizures” after potential exposure to cyclonite, also known as RDX.²² The National Institutes of Health describes cyclonite as a “very explosive” white powder and an acute toxin.⁵

The TOSHA investigation found systemic failures in the company’s handling of this hazardous material. The state claimed that some workers were not required to wear adequate personal protective equipment (PPE) that could have shielded them from the powder.²² In a particularly damning finding, the employee breakroom also tested positive for cyclonite.²² This indicated that the dangerous substance had migrated from production areas into common spaces, risking widespread contamination. AES initially contested the agency’s findings but later entered into a formal settlement agreement, paying penalties that ultimately totaled over $7,000.⁵,²¹,²²

The relatively small size of this penalty is striking when contrasted with the severity of the violations. For a company holding multi-million dollar defense contracts, a fine of roughly $7,000 for violations that resulted in employee seizures and involved the contamination of facilities with a high explosive could be viewed as a minor cost of doing business rather than a significant deterrent.⁹ This raises profound questions about the efficacy of the regulatory framework designed to ensure safety in such a high-consequence industry.

The penalty represented a tiny fraction—less than 0.01%—of the value of a single $120 million TNT contract the company was later awarded.¹,²² The gap between the documented risk to human life and the financial consequence of the regulatory penalty suggests a system that may not be adequately calibrated to compel a fundamental commitment to safety. This creates a potential moral hazard where the cost of compliance might be perceived as greater than the penalty for failure.

The following table summarizes the key safety incidents at the facility prior to the 2025 disaster.

Date	Incident / Violation	Company	Investigating Agency	Outcome / Details
April 2014	Fatal Explosion	Rio Ammunition (tenant)	ATF	1 fatality, 3 injuries. Ruled an accidental industrial explosion related to a cartridge loading machine.⁵,²⁰
April 2019	Hazardous Chemical Exposure	Accurate Energetic Systems	TOSHA	“Serious” violations for exposing employees to cyclonite without proper PPE, leading to seizures and breakroom contamination. AES paid over $7,000 in a settlement.⁵,²¹,²²

Questions of Ownership and Oversight

Beyond the physical risks managed on its campus, Accurate Energetic Systems presents a puzzle in its corporate structure. There is a significant discrepancy between its official certifications and its public-facing leadership. This contradiction raises questions about transparency and the integrity of federal contracting programs designed to support specific categories of business owners.

According to its own website and an archived version of its site, AES is certified as a Women-Owned Small Business (WOSB) by the U.S. Small Business Administration (SBA) and as a Women’s Business Enterprise (WBE) by the Women’s Business Enterprise National Council (WBENC).¹,²³,²⁴ These certifications are highly valued in the world of government contracting. The federal government has a statutory goal to award at least 5% of all prime contracting dollars to WOSBs.²⁵ This provides these companies with a competitive advantage in securing lucrative contracts.

However, the requirements for these certifications are stringent and clear. According to the SBA, to qualify as a WOSB, a business must be at least 51% directly and unconditionally owned and controlled by one or more women who are U.S. citizens. Critically, the regulations stipulate that the management and daily business operations must be controlled by one or more of the women owners.²⁵ The WBENC certification process is similarly meticulous. It involves an in-depth review of the business and a site inspection to confirm that the business is “at least 51% owned, operated, and controlled by a woman or women”.²³

Publicly available information about the leadership of AES appears to be in direct conflict with these requirements for female control and operation.

• A corporate profile of the company on the website of the Association of the United States Army (AUSA), a key industry group, lists John Sonday as the company’s President.¹⁵
• The Institute of Makers of Explosives (IME), the safety and security institute for the commercial explosives industry, lists Wendell Stinson as the CEO of Accurate Energetic Systems on its board of directors.²⁶ Following the October 10th explosion, it was Wendell Stinson who spoke to the media and issued statements on behalf of the company in the capacity of CEO.²,⁷

This presents a stark contradiction. While the ownership structure of the private company is not public, the key roles of President and CEO are both filled by men. These positions are unequivocally responsible for management and daily operations. Searches of industry directories and company publications do not reveal a woman in a C-suite or equivalent controlling role at AES. While a woman named Jessie Kelsey was listed as a manager and committee chair with an industry group, this does not represent executive control.²⁷ Public professional profiles indicate she left the company in 2022.²⁸

The table below highlights the discrepancy between the WOSB requirements and the company’s apparent leadership structure.

WOSB Certification Requirement (per SBA/WBENC)	Accurate Energetic Systems Public Leadership
Must be at least 51% owned and controlled by one or more women.²³,²⁵	Ownership structure is not public, but control appears to be male-led.
Management and daily business operations must be controlled by a woman.²⁵	President: John Sonday (listed by AUSA).¹⁵
	CEO: Wendell Stinson (listed by IME, quoted as CEO post-explosion).²,²⁶
For corporations, women must typically hold a majority of board seats.²⁵	Board composition is not public.

This discrepancy suggests the possibility that the company may be utilizing a figurehead ownership structure to qualify for the WOSB program. This would allow it to gain preferential access to federal contracts while day-to-day control remains in the hands of male executives. Such an arrangement would violate the spirit, and potentially the letter, of the SBA regulations, which are designed to foster genuine business development for female entrepreneurs.

Beyond the issue of contracting integrity, this lack of transparency in corporate governance could be indicative of a broader corporate culture. A willingness to exploit regulatory loopholes in one area, such as federal procurement, may correlate with a lax approach to compliance in other critical areas, including workplace safety. An opaque governance structure can obscure lines of accountability, making it more difficult to enforce a rigorous safety culture from the top down. The same opacity that clouds the company’s true leadership structure may also have obscured the systemic safety risks that were allowed to fester within its facilities, culminating in the tragic events of October 10th.

A Geopolitical Shockwave

The explosion at Accurate Energetic Systems was not just a localized tragedy. It was a blow to a U.S. defense industrial base already under immense strain from a global munitions crisis. The loss of a key domestic explosives manufacturer sent a shockwave through a supply chain made fragile by decades of offshoring. That supply chain is now stretched to its breaking point by the demands of modern warfare. To understand the full impact of the blast in Tennessee, one must look to the battlefields of Ukraine and the strategic calculations being made in Washington.

The world is in the midst of a severe and unexpected shortage of Trinitrotoluene, or TNT.²⁹,³⁰ Once cheap and plentiful, TNT is a foundational energetic material. It is used in a vast array of military munitions, most notably as the primary explosive fill for 155mm artillery shells.³⁰ It is also essential for the commercial sector, where it is used in cast boosters for mining, quarrying, and construction.³⁰

The primary driver of this shortage is the intense, artillery-driven war in Ukraine. The conflict has consumed shells at a rate not seen in generations. The United States alone has provided Ukraine with roughly 3 million 155mm shells, which translates to over 71 million pounds of TNT.²⁹

This surge in demand has collided with a sharp contraction in supply. The United States has not domestically produced TNT since the mid-1980s. It closed its last plant over environmental concerns related to hazardous waste.³¹,³² For decades, the Pentagon relied on imports and the recycling of decommissioned shells.²⁹ Now, those sources have dried up. Geopolitical tensions have led Russia and China to halt exports to the United States.³¹,³³ Poland, which had become the Pentagon’s sole authorized foreign supplier, is now diverting the bulk of its production to support Ukraine’s war effort.³¹,³³

This has left the U.S. in a precarious position. It has forced a scramble to re-shore this critical capability. In late 2024, the U.S. Army awarded a $435 million contract to REPKON USA to design and build a new, modern TNT production facility in Graham, Kentucky.³⁴,³⁵ However, this plant is not expected to be operational until 2028. It is also slated to serve military needs exclusively, offering no relief to the strained commercial market.³³,³⁴

In this context, domestic producers like Accurate Energetic Systems have become assets of immense strategic importance. As one of the few U.S. facilities capable of processing and producing TNT and other bulk explosives for the Department of War, AES was a critical node in a deeply constrained supply chain.⁹ The explosion on October 10th, therefore, was not just the loss of a factory; it was the incapacitation of a vital piece of the nation’s defense infrastructure.

The event directly exacerbates the national TNT shortage. It threatens to delay the replenishment of critical munitions stockpiles for the U.S. military. It will also further drive up costs and create delays for domestic mining and construction industries.³⁰ The incident starkly illustrates how decades of industrial base consolidation and offshoring have created strategic single points of failure. A local industrial accident can now have immediate and significant national security consequences. The safety culture of a single company in rural Tennessee has become inextricably linked to America’s ability to arm itself and its allies.

An Unanswered Blast

As the dust settles over the hills of Hickman and Humphreys counties, a series of profound and unsettling questions remain. The immediate focus for the community is on grieving the 16 lives lost and beginning the long process of healing. For investigators, regulators, and Pentagon planners, however, the work of understanding how this happened and preventing its recurrence has just begun.

The cause of the blast is the most pressing and immediate unknown. The ATF-led investigation is a complex, hazardous, and time-consuming endeavor. Officials have cautioned that a definitive explanation will not come quickly. The methodical forensic analysis of the volatile site is expected to take weeks, if not months.²,¹⁰ While there is no current indication of criminal intent, investigators have stated that foul play cannot be ruled out until the scene has been thoroughly processed.²,¹⁰ The community and the nation await their findings. These findings will be critical in determining whether the explosion was the result of a tragic accident, a systemic failure of safety protocols, or something more sinister.

Beyond the immediate cause, the incident demands a rigorous examination of corporate and regulatory accountability. The documented history of safety failures at the facility, particularly the 2019 TOSHA violations for exposing employees to an explosive toxin, will surely be a central focus. Did the company make the substantive changes it promised in its settlement with the state? Was a fine of just over $7,000 a sufficient penalty to compel a genuine and lasting commitment to safety in an industry where the consequences of failure are so absolute?

Furthermore, the glaring discrepancy between the company’s certification as a Women-Owned Small Business and its public-facing male leadership invites scrutiny from federal contracting authorities. These are not separate issues; they may both point to a corporate culture that requires deeper investigation.

Finally, the explosion at Accurate Energetic Systems serves as a brutal case study in the fragility of the American defense industrial base. The event has laid bare the strategic risks of relying on a small number of specialized, privately-owned facilities for critical materials like TNT, especially in an era of renewed global competition and conflict. The challenge for the Department of War is not simply to help rebuild one plant, but to foster a more resilient, secure, and geographically diverse industrial ecosystem.

Works Cited

1. Wikipedia. “2025 Accurate Energetic Systems explosion.” Accessed October 11, 2025. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2025_Accurate_Energetic_Systems_explosion
2. The Associated Press. “What to know about the blast at a Tennessee explosives plant that left no survivors.” October 10, 2025. https://apnews.com/article/tennessee-explosion-accurate-energetic-systems-513a9a952e9ba36f403032d43e3a87b2
3. The Guardian. “Nineteen people feared dead after blast at Tennessee munitions plant.” October 10, 2025. https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/oct/10/tennessee-military-explosives-plant-explosion
4. The Economic Times. “Tennessee bomb factory plant explosion: Deadly history haunts military munitions facility with past fines, scrutiny.” October 11, 2025. https://m.economictimes.com/news/international/global-trends/us-news-tennessee-bomb-factory-plant-explosion-deadly-history-haunts-military-munitions-facility-with-past-fines-scrutiny/articleshow/124478861.cms
5. The Washington Post. “19 missing after blast rocked Tennessee military explosives plant.” October 10, 2025. https://www.washingtonpost.com/nation/2025/10/10/tennessee-explosion-accurate-energetic-systems/
6. The Washington Post. “Sixteen dead after Tennessee plant explosion, sheriff says.” October 11, 2025. https://www.washingtonpost.com/nation/2025/10/11/tennessee-military-explosives-facility-blast/
7. PBS NewsHour. “Blast at a Tennessee explosives plant leaves multiple people dead and missing, sheriff says.” October 10, 2025. https://www.pbs.org/newshour/nation/blast-at-a-tennessee-explosives-plant-leaves-multiple-people-dead-and-missing-sheriff-says
8. The Associated Press. “16 people died in a blast at a Tennessee explosives factory early Friday, the sheriff says.” October 10, 2025. https://apnews.com/article/tennessee-explosives-plant-blast-investigation-cb8f8621306d50d6c54b523041a21322
9. CBS News. “No survivors after deadly blast at Tennessee military explosives plant, sheriff says.” October 11, 2025. https://www.cbsnews.com/news/explosion-tennessee-accurate-energetic-systems/
10. The Times of India. “US military plant explosion: ‘No survivors’ found after Tennessee blast; at least 16 presumed dead.” October 11, 2025. https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/world/us/us-military-plant-explosion-no-survivors-found-after-tennessee-blast-at-least-16-presumed-dead/articleshow/124486925.cms
11. PBS NewsHour. “No survivors from blast at Tennessee explosives factory, sheriff says.” October 11, 2025. https://www.pbs.org/newshour/nation/no-survivors-from-blast-at-tennessee-explosives-factory-sheriff-says
12. WPLN News. “UPDATE: Blast at Tennessee explosives plant leaves multiple people dead and missing.” October 10, 2025. https://wpln.org/post/powerful-blast-at-a-tennessee-military-explosives-plant-rattles-homes-miles-away/
13. Association of the United States Army (AUSA). “Accurate Energetic Systems, LLC.” Accessed October 11, 2025. https://www.ausa.org/sponsors/accurate-energetic-systems-llc
14. Tennessee Emergency Management Agency (TEMA). “Flash Report #4 Explosion in Hickman County.” October 11, 2025. https://www.tn.gov/tema/news/2025/10/11/flash-report–4-explosion-in-hickman-county.html
15. Association of the United States Army (AUSA). “Accurate Energetic Systems, LLC.” Accessed October 11, 2025. https://www.ausa.org/sponsors/accurate-energetic-systems-llc
16. Accurate Energetic Systems, LLC. “Markets.” Accessed October 11, 2025. https://www.aesys.biz/markets
17. Accurate Energetic Systems, LLC. “Test Capabilities.” Accessed October 11, 2025. https://www.aesys.biz/outdoor-testing-and-test-services
18. SMS Legal. “1 Killed, 3 Injured In Explosion At Ammunition Plant.” April 17, 2014. https://www.smslegal.com/blog/1-killed-3-injured-in-explosion-at-ammunition-plant/
19. WBIR. “Investigators rule deadly middle TN factory explosion accidental.” April 19, 2014. https://www.wbir.com/article/news/investigators-rule-deadly-middle-tn-factory-explosion-accidental/51-312202894
20. WBIR. “Investigators rule deadly middle TN factory explosion accidental.” April 19, 2014. https://www.wbir.com/article/news/investigators-rule-deadly-middle-tn-factory-explosion-accidental/51-312202894
21. Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA). “Inspection: 1395197.015 – Accurate Energetic Systems, Llc.” Accessed October 11, 2025. https://www.osha.gov/ords/imis/establishment.inspection_detail?id=1395197.015
22. YouTube (News 2). “Previous TOSHA violations at Accurate Energetic Systems plant.” October 10, 2025. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qeUhFbGq_-U
23. Accurate Energetic Systems, LLC. “AES Certified By the Women’s Business Enterprise National Council.” March 31, 2023. https://www.aesys.biz/post/aes-certified-by-wbenc
24. Accurate Energetic Systems, LLC. “AES Certified as a Women Owned Small Business.” Accessed October 11, 2025. https://www.aesys.biz/articles/categories/company-news
25. Women’s Business Enterprise National Council (WBENC). “WOSB Certification.” Accessed October 11, 2025. https://www.wbenc.org/certification/wosb-certification/
26. Institute of Makers of Explosives (IME). “Board of Governors.” Accessed October 11, 2025. https://ime.org/aws/IME/pt/sp/board-governors
27. Institute of Makers of Explosives (IME). “Safety, Health & Environmental Affairs Committee.” Accessed October 11, 2025. https://ime.org/aws/IME/pt/sp/ehs-committee
28. The Org. “Jessie Kelsey – Talent Acquisition / HR Generalist at Lawley.” Accessed October 11, 2025. https://theorg.com/org/lawley/org-chart/jessie-kelsey
29. Denver Gazette. “War in Ukraine causing global TNT shortage.” September 1, 2025. https://www.denvergazette.com/2025/09/01/war-in-ukraine-causing-global-tnt-shortage-82685824-d74b-55fb-ab27-bcadb4a5fd0e/
30. Institute of Makers of Explosives (IME). “2025 IME Federal Legislative & Regulatory Priorities.” 2025. https://ime.org/aws/IME/asset_manager/get_file/908266?ver=1
31. The War Zone. “Shell Game: The Worldwide TNT Shortage.” September 1, 2025. https://www.twz.com/land/shell-game-the-worldwide-tnt-shortage
32. National Security Journal. “The World Is Running Out of TNT, and the War in Ukraine Is to Blame.” September 2, 2025. https://nationalsecurityjournal.org/the-world-is-running-out-of-tnt-and-the-war-in-ukraine-is-to-blame/
33. KMJ Now. “War in Ukraine Causing Global Shortage of TNT.” September 1, 2025. https://www.kmjnow.com/2025/09/01/war-in-ukraine-causing-global-shortage-of-tnt/
34. U.S. Army. “U.S. Army awards contract for domestic TNT production.” November 21, 2024. https://www.army.mil/article/281247/u_s_army_awards_contract_for_domestic_tnt_production
35. National Defense Magazine. “Army Awards Contract for First Domestic TNT Production in 38 Years.” December 19, 2024. https://www.nationaldefensemagazine.org/articles/2024/12/19/army-awards-contract-for-first-domestic-tnt-production-in-38-years