GSI Technology (GSIT): A Deep-Dive Analysis of a Compute-in-Memory Pioneer at a Strategic Crossroads

A stylized circuit board resembling a human brain, with bright, glowing data pathways illustrating the concept of "compute-in-memory" where processing and storage are integrated.

Executive Summary

This report provides a due diligence analysis of GSI Technology, Inc. (NASDAQ: GSIT). The company is a legitimate public entity undertaking a high-risk, high-reward strategic transformation. This pivot is driven by its development of a novel “compute-in-memory” architecture. This technology aims to solve the fundamental “von Neumann bottleneck” that plagues traditional processors in AI and big data workloads.

  • Corporate Legitimacy: GSI Technology is an established semiconductor company. It was founded in 1995 and has been publicly traded on NASDAQ since 2007.¹,²,³,⁴ The company fully complies with all SEC reporting requirements, regularly filing 10-K and 10-Q reports.⁵,⁶ It is not a fraudulent entity.
  • Financial Condition: The company’s unprofitability is a deliberate choice. It is a direct result of its strategy to fund a massive research and development (R&D) effort for its new Associative Processing Unit (APU). This funding comes from revenue generated by its legacy Static Random Access Memory (SRAM) business.⁷,⁸ This strategy has led to persistent net losses and a high cash burn rate. These factors required recent capital-raising measures, including a sale-leaseback of its headquarters.⁹,¹⁰
  • Technological Viability: The Gemini APU’s “compute-in-memory” architecture is a legitimate and radical departure from conventional designs. It is engineered to solve the data movement bottleneck that limits performance in big data applications.¹¹,¹² Performance claims are substantiated by public benchmarks and independent academic reviews. These reviews highlight a significant advantage in performance-per-watt, especially in niche tasks like billion-scale similarity search.¹³,¹⁴ The query about “one-hot encoding” appears to be a misinterpretation. The APU’s core strength is its fundamental bit-level parallelism, not a dependency on any single data format.
  • Military Contracts and Market Strategy: The company holds legitimate contracts with multiple U.S. military branches. These include the U.S. Army, the U.S. Air Force (AFWERX), and the Space Development Agency (SDA).¹⁵,¹⁶,¹⁷ While modest in value, these contracts provide crucial third-party validation. They also represent a strategic entry into the lucrative aerospace and defense market.
  • Primary Investment Risks: The principal risk is one of market adoption. GSI Technology must achieve significant revenue from its APU products before its financial runway is exhausted. Success hinges on convincing the market to adopt its novel architecture over established incumbents. Failure could result in a significant loss of investment. Success, however, could yield substantial returns, defining GSIT as a classic high-risk, high-reward technology investment.

Corporate Profile: A Tale of Two Companies

From SRAM to AI: A Legacy of Niche Expertise

GSI Technology, Inc. is not a recent startup. The company was co-founded in March 1995 by Lee-Lean Shu and Robert Yau.¹,²,³,⁴ They established the firm in Silicon Valley as a specialized provider of high-performance semiconductor memory solutions.

For over two decades, its core business has been designing and marketing high-speed Static Random Access Memory (SRAM) products. These components are critical in markets that demand low-latency data access. Such markets include networking, telecommunications, industrial systems, and military applications.⁹,¹⁸,¹⁹,²⁰

The company completed its Initial Public Offering (IPO) in 2007. It listed on the NASDAQ exchange under the ticker GSIT.⁷,⁸ This long history has allowed GSI Technology to build deep expertise in memory design. It has also cultivated long-term relationships with key players in the semiconductor ecosystem, including a three-decade collaboration with Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company (TSMC).⁷,⁸ This background provides essential credibility for its current strategic direction.

The Strategic Pivot: Betting the Company on the APU

In recent years, GSI Technology has undertaken a profound strategic pivot. It is transforming from a stable SRAM provider into an innovation-driven company focused on the AI and High-Performance Computing (HPC) markets. The centerpiece of this transformation is a novel processor architecture called the Associative Processing Unit (APU).²⁰,²¹,²²

This is a “bet-the-company” initiative. GSI Technology has been systematically channeling revenue from its legacy SRAM business to fund the costly R&D required to bring the APU to market.⁷,⁸ The total investment in this endeavor exceeds $150 million.⁷,⁸ This decision to forego near-term profitability for a disruptive, long-term advantage explains the company’s financial performance.

The company’s history in high-performance SRAM is the very bedrock of its new technology. The APU is a “compute-in-memory” device, which merges processing logic with the memory array itself.¹¹,²³ Developing such an architecture requires deep expertise in high-speed memory design, the company’s core competency. This lineage makes the APU a natural, if highly ambitious, evolution of their capabilities.

This pivot has created a complex dual identity for the company. This often complicates its valuation and contributes to stock price volatility. To a financial analyst, GSI may appear to be a struggling memory company with persistent losses. To a technologist, it appears as a high-growth AI hardware startup. This disconnect leads to “meme stock” behavior, where its valuation can swing dramatically based on news or social media discussions.²² This is characteristic of ‘meme stock’ behavior, where stock prices can be heavily influenced by discussions on social media platforms like Reddit and Twitter, leading to rapid price fluctuations that are disconnected from the company’s immediate financial results.²²,²⁴

Financial Deep Dive: The High Cost of Innovation

An analysis of GSI Technology’s financial statements reveals a company that has consciously prioritized innovation over profitability. The immense R&D spending detailed here is the direct cause of the company’s losses. However, it is also the funding source for the potentially transformative technology examined in the next section.

A History of Unprofitability

The observation that GSI Technology has rarely turned a profit is accurate. This is a direct result of its strategic commitment to developing the APU. The company’s financial reports consistently show net losses. For the trailing twelve months (TTM), the company reported a negative Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratio of -6.36, a negative Return on Assets (ROA) of -27.10%, and a negative Return on Equity (ROE) of -36.97%.¹⁰,²⁵,²⁶

The primary driver of these losses is an R&D expenditure that is exceptionally high relative to revenue. For example, in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2023, R&D expenses were $5.0 million on net revenues of just $5.4 million.²² This pattern illustrates a clear management philosophy: invest every available dollar from the legacy business into creating a new product line.

MetricFY 2022FY 2023FY 2024FY 2025
Net Revenues$33.8M$28.3M$21.7M$20.5M
Gross Profit$18.8M$15.5M$11.8M$10.1M
R&D Expense$25.2M$22.7M$18.1M$13.5M
Loss from Operations($16.2M)($18.3M)($20.4M)($10.8M)
Net Loss($16.0M)($18.0M)($20.1M)($10.6M)
Net Loss Per Share($0.65)($0.73)($0.80)($0.42)

Financial data derived from company reports and financial summaries. FY 2022-2024 data is historical, FY 2025 data is based on the most recent annual report for the fiscal year ending March 31, 2025.⁹

Visualizing the Cost of Innovation

The chart below provides a visual representation of the data in the preceding table. It starkly illustrates how R&D spending has consistently consumed a large portion of revenue, resulting in sustained net losses.

The reduction in net loss from fiscal 2024 to fiscal 2025 warrants careful interpretation. This “improvement” does not stem from a surge in operational success. Instead, it is the result of deliberate cost-reduction initiatives and a one-time gain from the sale of the company’s headquarters.⁹ This demonstrates prudent financial management, but it is a sign of a company conserving resources, not one experiencing a fundamental business turnaround.

Balance Sheet and Liquidity Analysis

Given the high cash burn rate, GSI Technology’s balance sheet is critical to its survival. The company has historically maintained a strong liquidity position, with more cash than debt and a quick ratio of 5.09.¹⁰,²⁵ However, sustained losses have put this position under pressure.⁹

In response, management has executed several actions to bolster the balance sheet. In June 2024, the company completed a sale and leaseback of its property, generating $11.2 million.⁹ It also raised another $11.2 million through a securities offering in mid-2025.⁹ These are classic strategies for technology companies in the early commercialization phase.

This analysis reveals a company in a race against time. As of March 31, 2025, cash and cash equivalents stood at $13.4 million.⁷,⁹ With a projected cash burn of $2.5 to $3.0 million per quarter, the company has a financial runway of approximately four to five quarters.⁷ The company will likely need to secure additional funding within the next 18 months, posing a risk to current shareholders. This creates a critical window for the next-generation Gemini-II APU to begin generating meaningful revenue when it becomes available in mid-2025.²⁷

Technology Teardown: The Gemini Associative Processing Unit (APU)

The credibility of GSI Technology’s strategic pivot rests on the performance of its Gemini APU. This section deconstructs the APU’s architecture, clarifies its function, and outlines the product’s evolution.

Solving the Von Neumann Bottleneck

For over 70 years, computer architecture has been dominated by the von Neumann model. In this model, a central processing unit (CPU) is separate from memory. Data must be constantly shuttled back and forth between where it is stored and where it is processed. For tasks involving massive datasets, this constant data movement creates a traffic jam known as the “von Neumann bottleneck”.¹¹,¹²,²³ This bottleneck is the primary factor limiting performance in many big data and AI applications. GSI Technology’s APU attempts to solve this problem by changing the architecture itself.

Architecture of an Associative Processor: True Compute-in-Memory

The Gemini APU is a true compute-in-memory (CIM) processor. Instead of moving data to a processor, it moves the processing directly into the memory array.¹¹,²⁹ To use an analogy, traditional computing is like taking ingredients (data) out of the refrigerator (memory) to prepare them on a countertop (processor). The APU, by contrast, prepares the ingredients right inside the refrigerator itself, saving enormous time and energy.

The architecture is a fundamental departure from CPUs and GPUs:

  • Massive Bit-Level Parallelism: The Gemini-I chip contains over two million simple “bit-processing units” integrated within the SRAM memory structure.¹²,³⁰ This is like having millions of tiny helpers, each performing a simple task, all working at the exact same time on every piece of information in the memory.
  • Boolean RISC Processing: At its core, the APU provides a Boolean RISC (Reduced Instruction Set Computer) processing capability.²⁹ Each of the millions of bit-engines can perform simple logical operations (AND, OR, XOR) simultaneously.
  • Variable Precision: A key advantage is its granularity at the 1-bit level. This allows users to define whatever data precision they need, from 1-bit for binary operations to much larger structures.²¹,²⁹ This flexibility is a significant differentiator from GPUs, which are typically hard-coded for specific precisions.
  • Eliminating the Bottleneck: By performing computations “in-place,” the APU eliminates the need to move data across an I/O bus. This results in enormous internal memory bandwidth and leads to orders-of-magnitude improvements in the performance-per-watt ratio.¹¹,¹²,²³

Clarifying the Role of “One-Hot Encoding”

To be clear, one-hot encoding is not a foundational principle of the APU’s architecture. Rather, it is a data format the APU is exceptionally good at processing. One-hot encoding is a common technique in machine learning. It converts categorical data (like words) into a numerical format. For example, “cat” might be encoded as , "dog" as , and “rat” as “.³¹,³²,³³

A review of GSI’s technical documentation reveals that the APU’s architecture is defined by its bit-level parallelism, not by a reliance on any single data format.¹²,²⁹,³⁴

However, the APU’s design makes it exceptionally well-suited to processing data that has been one-hot encoded. The resulting sparse binary vectors are ideal for the APU’s millions of bit-engines. Operations like Hamming distance, used in similarity searches, can be executed with extreme efficiency in parallel. In summary, the APU’s power comes from its massive bit-level parallelism, which makes it an ideal accelerator for workloads that use formats like one-hot encoded vectors, among many others.

The Product Roadmap: Gemini-I, Gemini-II, and Plato

GSI Technology has a clear, multi-generational roadmap for its APU technology:

  • Gemini-I (28nm process): This is the first-generation production chip and the basis for most current performance benchmarks. It is available in server products like the Leda-E and Leda-S boards.⁷,⁸,²⁰,²¹
  • Gemini-II (16nm process): The second-generation APU represents a significant leap in performance. It claims more than four times the processing power and eight times the memory density of its predecessor.²² Boards are scheduled to be available to customers in mid-2025.⁷,²¹,²⁷
  • Plato (12nm process): This next-generation chip is in the design phase. Plato is being architected for the growing market for large language models (LLMs) and generative AI at the edge, where low power consumption is paramount.⁷,⁸,²⁷ A key advantage is its ability to efficiently quantize LLMs into low-precision formats without significant accuracy loss, making it possible to run complex models on power-constrained devices.⁷,⁸

This roadmap shows a clear path of improvement. However, it also underscores how early the company is in its commercialization journey. The APU is a specialist processor. Its performance gains are concentrated in algorithms that can be decomposed into simple, massively parallel bitwise operations. It is not designed to replace CPUs or GPUs in all tasks. Its role is that of a highly efficient co-processor for a specific, but growing, class of computational problems.

Performance Validation: Benchmarks and Third-Party Analysis

Claims of revolutionary performance require rigorous validation. GSI Technology has substantiated the APU’s capabilities through public benchmarks and independent analysis.

Billion-Scale Similarity Search: The DEEP1B Benchmark

The company’s most prominent performance claim centers on the DEEP1B benchmark. This is a public dataset of one billion vectors used to test similarity search algorithms.³⁷ In this test, a server with four Gemini-I APU boards performed a query-by-query search with a latency of just 1.25 milliseconds while achieving 92.5% accuracy.³⁷

This result is significant. The query-by-query nature of the test mimics real-world applications like e-commerce recommendations, where low latency is critical.³⁷ GSI Technology was the first to publish a result of near one-millisecond latency with high accuracy on a dataset of this scale.³⁷

In a comparison against a state-of-the-art Microsoft solution for a 40 billion item database, the APU-based system was projected to deliver lower latency (1.25 ms vs. 5–8 ms) with a dramatically smaller hardware footprint (40 servers vs. 166 servers) and an estimated 6x improvement in power efficiency.¹³

Comparative Analysis vs. CPU & GPU

Direct comparisons against industry-standard processors provide the clearest picture of the APU’s strengths. A white paper from The Linley Group concluded that the Gemini APU can achieve more than 100x the performance of a standard Intel Xeon server on certain algorithms, while reducing power consumption by 70%.¹²

Perhaps the most compelling evidence comes from a September 2023 academic paper by researchers at Northern Arizona University.¹⁴ The study evaluated the APU, an NVIDIA A100 GPU, and a multi-core CPU on a hash-based cryptography protocol. The key findings were:

  • For the SHA-1 algorithm, the Gemini-I APU delivered performance similar to the A100 GPU.¹⁴,²⁰
  • The APU was “much more energy efficient,” requiring only 39.2% of the energy of the GPU to complete the task.¹⁴,²⁰

The consistent theme across all performance data is the APU’s superior power efficiency. This performance-per-watt advantage is its most critical differentiator. This focus is highly strategic, as the rapid expansion of AI is creating an energy crisis in data centers.³⁸,³⁹ A hardware solution that delivers competitive performance at a fraction of the power consumption addresses a critical economic and environmental pain point.

Market Opportunity & Strategic Focus: Aerospace, Defense, and the AI Edge

GSI Technology is targeting markets where the APU’s unique combination of parallelism, low latency, and power efficiency provides a distinct advantage.

Target Addressable Markets

The APU’s architecture is well-suited for a range of data-intensive applications. Key target markets include:

  • Vector Search and Generative AI: The APU is highly efficient at the nearest-neighbor searches that form the backbone of modern recommendation engines and the retrieval functions of large language models.¹¹,²³,³⁸,²²
  • Aerospace & Defense (A&D): Applications like Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) image processing and object recognition require real-time processing of massive sensor data streams at the edge, where power is limited.²⁹,³⁸
  • Life Sciences: The technology can accelerate tasks like drug discovery, which involve searching vast molecular databases.¹¹,²³
  • Security: High-speed facial recognition and object detection benefit from the APU’s low-latency search capabilities.¹¹,³⁸

The U.S. Government as a Key Customer

The company’s military contracts are legitimate and form a cornerstone of its validation strategy. These awards are primarily from the Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR) program, a highly competitive U.S. government program.⁴⁰

These contracts provide non-dilutive R&D funding. More importantly, they serve as a powerful endorsement of the technology from technically demanding customers. A technology vetted by agencies like the U.S. Air Force carries a significant stamp of credibility.

Awarding AgencyProgramAnnounced ValueStated Objectives / Technology Focus
U.S. ArmySBIR Phase IUp to $250,000Develop edge AI solutions with Gemini-II; research 1-bit Large Language Models (LLMs) for low-power environments.⁷,¹⁵,⁴¹
U.S. Air Force (AFWERX)SBIR Direct-to-Phase II$1.1 millionAdapt Gemini APU for Air and Space Force edge computing; leverage power efficiency and integral radiation tolerance.¹⁶,⁸,⁴²
Space Development Agency (SDA)Other Transaction Agreement (OTA)~$1.25 millionDevelop the next-generation APU-2 for enhanced space-based capabilities, addressing big data processing challenges in orbit.¹⁷,⁸

The focus of these contracts—edge computing, radiation tolerance, and SAR processing—suggests that GSI’s most immediate market is in aerospace and defense. Success in this sector could provide the financial foundation for a push into the commercial data center space.

Competitive Landscape: A Niche Player in a Field of Giants

GSI Technology operates in the intensely competitive semiconductor industry. It faces both small rivals and entrenched giants like NVIDIA, Intel, and AMD.²⁶,⁴³

GSI’s strategy is not one of direct confrontation. It is not trying to build a better GPU than NVIDIA. Such a battle would be impossible given the disparity in R&D budgets.²⁶ Instead, the company’s strategy is one of architectural differentiation. It argues that for a specific class of problems, the conventional von Neumann architecture is fundamentally inefficient.

To overcome the immense inertia of NVIDIA’s CUDA platform, GSI’s strategy is one of targeted infiltration. By focusing on niche markets like aerospace and defense, where power efficiency is paramount, the company can establish a foothold where CUDA is less dominant.⁴² Furthermore, by pursuing integrations with specialized software platforms, such as BIOVIA for life sciences, GSI can embed its technology within existing workflows, reducing the barrier to adoption.¹¹

The company’s success depends on proving that for tasks like billion-item vector search, the APU’s compute-in-memory architecture offers a 10x or 100x advantage in performance-per-watt.¹² It must win the architectural argument in a niche where its design is the demonstrably superior tool.

Investment Thesis & Risk Analysis: A High-Stakes Bet on a Paradigm Shift

An investment in GSI Technology is a speculative, high-risk bet on the company’s ability to commercialize a disruptive new computing architecture. The potential outcomes are binary: a significant loss of capital if they fail, or a substantial return if they succeed.

The Bull Case: Disruptive Technology at an Inflection Point

The optimistic view is grounded in the potential of the APU technology. GSI possesses a novel, patented architecture that offers an order-of-magnitude improvement in performance-per-watt for a growing class of AI problems.¹²,³⁴ This advantage has been validated by public benchmarks and through R&D contracts with U.S. military and space agencies.¹⁴,¹⁷,³⁷ With the more powerful Gemini-II chip now coming to market, the company is at a potential inflection point where R&D could begin to translate into significant revenue.

Key Catalysts to Watch

Investors should monitor several key milestones that could serve as catalysts for the company’s valuation:

  • Government Contract Execution: Successful completion of SBIR Phase II milestones for the U.S. Air Force and Space Development Agency contracts.⁶
  • Gemini-II Commercialization: Announcement of initial design wins or volume purchase orders for Gemini-II boards from major defense or commercial customers.⁵
  • Plato Development: Progress updates on the Plato chip, particularly securing the necessary funding for its development.⁵,⁶
  • Strategic Partnerships: The formation of new partnerships with software vendors or large enterprise customers that validate the APU’s utility.

The Bear Case & Key Risks: A Perilous Path to Commercialization

The path to success is fraught with significant risks.

  • Market Adoption Risk: This is the single greatest risk. GSI Technology faces the monumental challenge of convincing a conservative industry to adopt a novel architecture. This requires not only a hardware advantage but also a robust and user-friendly software ecosystem to overcome the inertia of platforms like NVIDIA’s CUDA.⁹ To counter this, GSI provides a software development kit (SDK) with a compiler and libraries supporting C, Python, and TensorFlow.⁷,¹¹ However, achieving a successful ecosystem is a significant long-term undertaking.
  • Financial Risk: The company is burning cash at a high rate and has a finite financial runway.⁷,⁹ Failure to secure major contracts or raise additional capital within the next 12-18 months could jeopardize its operations.
  • Execution Risk: The company must flawlessly execute a difficult transition from an R&D-focused entity to a commercially successful one. This includes delivering new chips on schedule and building an effective global sales and marketing organization.¹⁷,⁴¹
  • Competitive Risk: Technology giants are not static. NVIDIA, Intel, and others are aggressively working to improve the efficiency of their own products. Future improvements from incumbents could narrow the APU’s advantage.

Conclusion

GSI Technology is a legitimate public company. It is not a scam. The company has made a courageous and costly bet on a novel compute-in-memory architecture. This technology appears to have genuine, validated advantages in specific, high-value niches. Its early traction with the U.S. Department of Defense provides a powerful endorsement of its potential.

However, an investment in GSIT is far from a sure thing. The company faces a perilous journey to commercialization. The investment thesis rests entirely on the successful adoption of the APU. Ultimately, success or failure will depend on whether the APU’s unique selling proposition—delivering orders-of-magnitude improvements in performance-per-watt for specific, data-intensive tasks—is compelling enough to carve out a profitable niche in a market dominated by giants. The evidence suggests the technology is real and the potential is significant, but the risks are equally substantial.


Works Cited

  1. Moomoo. “GSI Technology Company Profile.” https://www.moomoo.com/stock/GSIT-US/company
  2. Tracxn. “GSI Technology Company Details.” https://tracxn.com/d/companies/gsi-technology/__ekR5DjmRRmd3q-nhwYX5Y33HhnRf1Oe5Ews3O7EzTvs
  3. GSI Technology, Inc. “Management Biographies.” https://ir.gsitechnology.com/corporate-governance/management/
  4. U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. “GSI Technology, Inc. Press Release, Exhibit 99.1.” https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1126741/000110262416002708/gsitechnologyinc.htm
  5. U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. “GSI Technology, Inc. Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2023.” https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1126741/000155837023011516/gsit-20230331x10k.htm
  6. GSI Technology, Inc. “Investor Relations – SEC Filings.” https://ir.gsitechnology.com/financial-information/sec-filings/
  7. GSI Technology, Inc. “Investor Presentation, March 2025.” https://ir.gsitechnology.com/static-files/c3ad5b48-464e-43ec-8fb7-441fb87edd1e
  8. GSI Technology, Inc. “Investor Presentation, Summer 2025.” https://ir.gsitechnology.com/static-files/7f479981-4db7-4ac1-846f-666b571b0e6f
  9. TradingView News. “GSI Technology, Inc. SEC 10-K Report.” https://www.tradingview.com/news/tradingview:898d7a11d83de:0-gsi-technology-inc-sec-10-k-report/
  10. Finviz. “GSI Technology Inc. (GSIT) Stock Quote.” https://finviz.com/quote.ashx?t=GSIT
  11. GSI Technology, Inc. “GSI’s Solution For Search And Next Generation High Performance Computing.” https://gsitechnology.com/compute/
  12. The Linley Group. “In-Memory Acceleration For Big Data.” https://gsitechnology.com/Linley-Group-In-Memory-Acceleration-for-Big-Data/
  13. GSI Technology, Inc. “Gemini APU Enabling High-Performance Billion-Scale Similarity Search.” https://gsitechnology.com/gemini-apu-enabling-high-performance-billion-scale-similarity-search/
  14. GSI Technology, Inc. “Evaluating Accelerators for a High-Throughput Hash-Based Security Protocol.” https://gsitechnology.com/evaluating-accelerators-for-a-high-throughput-hash-based-security-protocol/
  15. GlobeNewswire. “GSI Technology Selected for U.S. Army SBIR Contract to Advance Edge AI Computing.” https://www.globenewswire.com/news-release/2025/01/17/3011431/0/en/GSI-Technology-Selected-for-U-S-Army-SBIR-Contract-to-Advance-Edge-AI-Computing.html
  16. GSI Technology, Inc. “GSI Technology Receives Award from U.S. Air Force Research Laboratory.” https://ir.gsitechnology.com/news-releases/news-release-details/gsi-technology-receives-award-us-air-force-research-laboratory/
  17. GSI Technology, Inc. “GSI Technology Receives Award With Potential Total Value Of Approximately $1.25 Million From The Space Development Agency.” https://ir.gsitechnology.com/news-releases/news-release-details/gsi-technology-receives-award-potential-total-value/
  18. Kraken. “GSI Technology (GSIT) Stock Information.” https://www.kraken.com/stocks/gsit
  19. AnnualReports.com. “GSI Technology Inc.” https://www.annualreports.com/Company/gsi-technology-inc
  20. GSI Technology, Inc. “GSI Technology Announces Production Release of Two Gemini-I APU Servers.” https://ir.gsitechnology.com/news-releases/news-release-details/gsi-technology-announces-production-release-two-gemini-ir-apu/
  21. GSI Technology, Inc. “GSI Technology Reiterates Key Takeaways From Q4 FY2024 Earnings Call and Provides Q&A.” https://ir.gsitechnology.com/news-releases/news-release-details/gsi-technology-reiterates-key-takeaways-q4-fy2024-earnings-call/
  22. Searchium.ai. “GSI Technology: More Than A Meme And A Viable Alternative To Nvidia.” https://searchium.ai/gsi-technology-more-than-a-meme-and-aviable-alternative-to-nvidia/
  23. GSI Technology, Inc. “Compute-in-Memory Definition Whitepaper.” https://gsitechnology.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/default/files/Whitepapers/D0070-GSIT-Compute-in-Memory%20Definition.pdf
  24. Suffolk University Journal of High Technology Law. “The Increasing Influence of Social Media on the Stock Market.” https://sites.suffolk.edu/jhtl/2023/02/22/the-increasing-influence-of-social-media-on-the-stock-market/
  25. Investing.com. “GSI Technology Inc (GSIT) Financial Summary.” https://uk.investing.com/equities/gsi-technology-financial-summary
  26. MarketBeat. “GSI Technology Competitors and Alternatives.” https://www.marketbeat.com/stocks/NASDAQ/GSIT/competitors-and-alternatives/
  27. GSI Technology, Inc. “Third Quarter Fiscal 2025 Conference Call Transcript.” https://ir.gsitechnology.com/static-files/142349c6-1fcb-41b5-bc80-8157d134f9c7
  28. GSI Technology, Inc. “Aerospace & Defense Overview.” https://gsitechnology.com/aerospace-and-defense/
  29. GSI Technology, Inc. “Gemini Compute-In-Memory Power and Performance Application Advantages.” https://gsitechnology.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/default/files/Whitepapers/D0069-GSIT-Compute-in-Memory-Application.pdf
  30. Wikipedia. “One-hot.” https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/One-hot
  31. Educative.io. “One-Hot Encoding.” https://www.educative.io/blog/one-hot-encoding
  32. YouTube. “What is One Hot Encoding?” https://www.youtube.com/shorts/Dz8zNQNW9RQ
  33. GSI Technology, Inc. “GSI Technology Patents.” https://gsitechnology.com/gsi-technology-patents/
  34. GSI Technology, Inc. “Gemini-I® Demonstrates High Performance in Billion-Scale Similarity Search Benchmark Results.” https://ir.gsitechnology.com/news-releases/news-release-details/gsi-technologys-gemini-ir-demonstrates-high-performance-billion/
  35. GSI Technology, Inc. “AI’s Energy Dilemma.” https://gsitechnology.com/ais-energy-dilemma/
  36. GSI Technology, Inc. “Generative AI Overview.” https://gsitechnology.com/generative-ai-overview/
  37. Space Development Agency. “Competition Opportunities.” https://www.sda.mil/opportunities-copy/
  38. Investing.com. “GSI Technology secures US Army AI contract.” https://www.investing.com/news/company-news/gsi-technology-secures-us-army-ai-contract-93CH-3818904
  39. GlobeNewswire. “GSI Technology to Perform Feasibility Study for Commercially Proven APU Use in U.S. Air and Space Force Edge Computing.” https://www.globenewswire.com/news-release/2023/07/12/2703508/0/en/GSI-Technology-to-Perform-Feasibility-Study-for-Commercially-Proven-APU-Use-in-U-S-Air-and-Space-Force-Edge-Computing.html
  40. Simply Wall St. “GSI Technology Competitors.” https://simplywall.st/stocks/us/semiconductors/nasdaq-gsit/gsi-technology

Comments

Leave a Reply