An Analytical Profile of Ahmed al-Sharaa: From Al-Qaeda Insurgent to Syrian Head of State

Executive Summary

The public life of Ahmed Hussein al-Sharaa, Syria’s new head of state, is defined by a profound chasm. This gap lies between his documented past as a committed Salafi-jihadist and his recent, meticulously curated image as a pragmatic statesman.

This report argues that his evolution is one of strategic adaptation, not genuine ideological transformation. His career has been marked by a series of calculated shifts. These include his role in Al-Qaeda in Iraq (AQI), his founding of the Al-Nusra Front, and his leadership of Hay’at Tahrir al-Sham (HTS). Each move was a direct response to geopolitical pressures and was aimed at consolidating power.

His early years in AQI immersed him in extreme violence. His subsequent incarceration in U.S.-run facilities like Camp Bucca served as a “jihadist university,” where he honed a Syria-centric strategy.

While al-Sharaa has successfully rebranded his organization, his claims of moderation are fundamentally undermined by credible reports of large-scale atrocities. In March 2025, forces under his command carried out explicitly sectarian massacres of Alawite civilians.⁴⁰ This demonstrates that the capacity for extreme brutality remains a core component of his power.

This record suggests his current pragmatism is a conditional tactic, not a change of heart. It poses a significant and enduring threat to regional stability. This report will trace his evolution and assess the threat his regime represents.

The Formative Years: Radicalization and the Iraqi Insurgency (2003-2006)

To understand the man who now rules Syria, it is essential to examine his early life. This section covers the ideological convictions that drove his radicalization and his apprenticeship in the brutal Iraqi insurgency.

A. Joining the Jihad: An Ideologue, Not an Outcast

Ahmed al-Sharaa’s path to violent extremism was born of ideological conviction, not poverty or marginalization. He was born in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, in 1982 to a well-to-do Syrian family and raised in the affluent Mezzeh neighborhood of Damascus. His father was an oil engineer and real estate professional, and his mother was a geography teacher. Classmates recalled him as a studious, unremarkable youth who became devoutly religious at age 17.¹, ²

Key geopolitical events spurred his radicalization. He cited the Second Palestinian Intifada in 2000 as the moment he felt a duty to “stand up to oppressors.” The September 11, 2001, attacks further shaped his worldview.³, ⁴ He later admitted that, like many in the Arab world, he was initially happy about 9/11, though he regretted the killing of innocents.³, ⁵

The final catalyst was the impending U.S.-led invasion of Iraq in 2003. Then a university student, al-Sharaa made a premeditated decision to join the insurgency. He traveled to Baghdad just weeks before the war began.¹, ³ This ideological conviction soon translated into direct action on the battlefield.

B. Al-Qaeda in Iraq: An Apprenticeship in Brutality

In Iraq, al-Sharaa joined Al-Qaeda in Iraq (AQI). The franchise was led by the notoriously violent Abu Musab al-Zarqawi.⁴, ⁶ This decision placed him at the epicenter of one of the most brutal insurgencies of the modern era.

AQI’s operational doctrine was twofold. First, it waged a relentless guerrilla war against U.S. and coalition forces through IEDs, sniper attacks, and ambushes. Second, it deliberately ignited a sectarian civil war by orchestrating mass-casualty attacks against Iraq’s majority Shia population.⁴, ⁷

Al-Sharaa proved adept within this framework and quickly rose to become a cell leader.⁴ His time in AQI was a foundational apprenticeship in the tactics of terror and sectarian warfare that would define his later career.

C. Assessing Culpability for Western Casualties

No public record attributes a specific attack directly to Ahmed al-Sharaa. However, his confirmed three-year leadership role within AQI from 2003 to 2006 establishes his direct complicity in the group’s violent campaign. During this period, AQI was one of the most lethal actors in Iraq, responsible for the deaths of numerous American, British, and other allied personnel.

The following table contextualizes the violence in which he participated. It summarizes major attacks claimed by or attributed to AQI during his active tenure. His command responsibility strongly suggests his participation in operations aimed at killing coalition troops.

Date	Location	Target/Method	Casualties
Oct 2004	Iraq	Kidnapping/Execution	Japanese citizen Shosei Koda killed.⁸
Jan 30, 2005	Iraq (nationwide)	Attacks on voters	44 people killed in over 100 attacks.⁸
Feb 28, 2005	Hillah, Iraq	Car bomb	125 Iraqi police and National Guard recruits killed.⁸
Apr 2, 2005	Abu Ghraib, Iraq	Suicide/Conventional Attack	Attack on Abu Ghraib prison.⁸
May 7, 2005	Baghdad, Iraq	Car bombs	22 people killed, including two Americans.⁸
Jul 6, 2005	Iraq	Kidnapping/Execution	Egypt’s ambassador to Iraq, Ihab el-Sherif, killed.⁸
Aug 19, 2005	Aqaba, Jordan	Rocket attack	1 Jordanian soldier killed; attack targeted U.S. Navy ships.⁷, ⁸
Sep 14, 2005	Baghdad, Iraq	Series of bombings	Approx. 160 people killed, mostly Shia civilians.⁸
Nov 9, 2005	Amman, Jordan	Hotel bombings	60 people killed.⁸, ⁹
Feb 22, 2006	Samarra, Iraq	Mosque bombing	Bombing of the al-Askari “Golden Dome” Mosque, a major catalyst for sectarian civil war.⁸
Jun 3, 2006	Iraq	Kidnapping/Execution	Four Russian diplomats killed.⁸
Jun 16, 2006	Baghdad, Iraq	Checkpoint attack	1 U.S. soldier killed, two abducted.⁸

This record demonstrates the scale and nature of the violence perpetrated by the organization in which al-Sharaa served as a commander.

The Crucible: Incarceration and Ideological Development (2006-2011)

A. Capture and Internment

U.S. forces captured al-Sharaa in Iraq in 2006, cutting short his initial jihadist career.¹⁰ He would spend the next five years in American and Iraqi custody. This period proved to be a critical phase of incubation and strategic development.¹¹, ¹²

The most significant site of his detention was Camp Bucca. This massive U.S.-run facility in southern Iraq has since become infamous for its role in the formation of the Islamic State.⁴, ¹³

B. Camp Bucca: The “Jihadist University”

Camp Bucca functioned as an unprecedented networking hub for the jihadist movement.¹⁴, ¹⁵ One former inmate, a senior ISIS official known as Abu Ahmed, described it as a “factory” that “made us all” and “built our ideology”.¹⁶

Within its walls, the future leadership of both Al-Qaeda and ISIS were held in close proximity. This included the man who would become Caliph, Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi.⁴, ¹⁶ This environment provided a unique opportunity to exchange ideas, forge alliances, and plan their next phase.¹⁶, ¹⁷ The command structure of the future Islamic State was effectively born there.¹³, ¹⁵

Al-Sharaa was a key figure within this milieu.⁶ However, a crucial detail distinguishes his focus. While detained, he reportedly “spent much of his time there researching and plotting against Assad’s Syria”.⁴ This reveals that his ambitions were already turning toward his home country, foreshadowing his later conflict with Baghdadi. His time in Bucca was a period of intense strategic planning for a distinct, Syria-focused project.

C. The 2011 Release: Correcting the Record

A common misconception suggests al-Sharaa was freed in a large-scale ISIS jailbreak. This is incorrect. The major prison assaults orchestrated by ISIS occurred in 2012 and 2013, well after his release.¹⁴, ¹⁵

Al-Sharaa was released from custody in 2011.¹ His release was a standard procedure as U.S. forces drew down their presence. Critically, his freedom coincided with the outbreak of the Syrian Revolution. This provided the perfect opportunity to activate the plans he had developed during his five years of incarceration.

D. Ranking of Intelligence Sources on His Imprisonment

Available sources provide varying levels of detail on al-Sharaa’s imprisonment. A ranking from most to least informative offers a clearer picture:

1. Britannica⁴**:** This source is the most valuable. It confirms his detention in Camp Bucca and provides the crucial insight that he spent his time there “researching and plotting against Assad’s Syria.”
2. The Washington Institute⁶**:** This analysis explicitly places his time in “the infamous Camp Bucca prison” between his service under Zarqawi and his later role as an emir for the Islamic State of Iraq.
3. Counter Extremism Project¹³**:** This source offers specific confirmation of his arrest by the U.S. military and imprisonment in Camp Bucca, which it correctly identifies as the “birthplace of Isis.”
4. Wikipedia¹**:** These entries provide the foundational facts: capture by American forces and imprisonment from 2006 to 2011.
5. PBS/Frontline & CBS/60 Minutes³, ¹¹, ¹⁹**:** These journalistic accounts are the least specific. They refer to his time in “American and Iraqi prisons” but do not name Camp Bucca or detail his personal activities.

The Syrian Front: Founding and Leading Al-Nusra (2011-2016)

A. The Mission from Baghdadi and the Break

Upon his release in 2011, al-Sharaa reconnected with his prison network. Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi, then leader of the Islamic State of Iraq (ISI), tasked him with establishing a new front in Syria.²⁰, ⁶ Al-Sharaa’s mission was to exploit the uprising against Bashar al-Assad.

He began with meager resources, initially sent with only six men.¹⁹, ³² However, ISI soon provided experienced personnel, weapons, and funding. This allowed his new group, Jabhat al-Nusra (the Al-Nusra Front), to grow into a formidable force.²¹

The relationship soured in 2013. Baghdadi sought to reassert authority by unilaterally announcing a merger of the two groups into the “Islamic State of Iraq and Syria” (ISIS).²², ²³ Al-Sharaa refused to be subordinated. In a masterful counter-move, he publicly rejected the decree and pledged direct allegiance to Al-Qaeda’s global leader, Ayman al-Zawahiri.²⁰, ²²

Zawahiri sided with al-Sharaa, affirming al-Nusra as the official Al-Qaeda affiliate in Syria.²³ Baghdadi refused, triggering a violent schism between the two most powerful jihadist organizations in the region.

B. The Benghazi Attack: A Definitive Assessment

There is no credible evidence linking Ahmed al-Sharaa or the Al-Nusra Front to the 2012 terrorist attack on U.S. facilities in Benghazi, Libya.

• Perpetrators: The group responsible was Ansar al-Sharia in Benghazi (AAS-B), a distinct Libyan jihadist militia.²⁴
• Intelligence Reports: Exhaustive investigations by U.S. congressional committees make no mention of the Al-Nusra Front in connection with the attack.²⁵, ²⁶, ²⁷, ²⁸
• Operational Focus: During this period, Al-Nusra’s focus was exclusively on the Syrian civil war.²⁹, ³⁰ Al-Sharaa has consistently maintained his policy was against conducting attacks outside of Syria.³¹, ³²

C. Al-Nusra’s Campaign of Violence: A Strategic Ranking

Al-Nusra quickly became the most feared anti-regime force in Syria. It employed a range of tactics, ranked here by strategic impact and lethality.

1. Mass-Casualty Suicide Bombings: This was al-Nusra’s signature tactic. The group deployed suicide bombers in vehicle-borne improvised explosive devices (VBIEDs) to strike at the heart of the Assad regime’s security infrastructure.³³, ³⁴ These attacks were designed for maximum psychological terror and frequently killed large numbers of “innocent Syrian civilians”.¹¹, ³⁵
2. Targeted Assassinations and Executions: Al-Nusra systematically targeted and eliminated regime figures, including military officers and a state television presenter.³⁶
3. Large-Scale Conventional Military Assaults: Al-Nusra also proved to be a highly sophisticated conventional military force. It successfully planned and executed large-scale assaults to seize and hold territory, including military bases and airports.³⁷, ²¹
4. Governance and Social Outreach: In a stark contrast to its violence, al-Nusra ran a “hearts and minds” campaign. It sought to win popular support by providing humanitarian aid, policing, and basic civil services in the areas it controlled.²⁹, ²¹ This insidious strategy allowed the group to embed itself deeply within Syrian society.

This strategic divergence in state-building was a core reason for the split with Baghdadi. While Baghdadi’s overt brutality alienated nearly everyone, al-Sharaa’s more disciplined application of violence allowed his organization to survive and ultimately outlast its rivals.

A Record of Brutality: Sectarian Violence and War Crimes

A. Targeting the Druze Community

Al-Sharaa’s organizations have a documented history of sectarian violence. In June 2015, fighters from his Al-Nusra Front massacred at least twenty civilians in the Druze village of Qalb Loze.³⁸, ³⁹ The group’s official response was a transparent attempt at damage control. It claimed the killings were an “unjustifiable mistake” by rogue members.³⁸, ³⁹

This pattern continued after al-Sharaa became head of state. In July 2025, his security forces were accused of executing unarmed members of the Druze community during clashes in the southern city of Sweida.¹¹, ¹²

B. The 2025 Massacres of Alawites: A Test of the “New Syria”

The most damning evidence against al-Sharaa’s claims of moderation came in March 2025. In a series of centrally coordinated “security ‘combing’ operations,” forces under his command conducted systematic, large-scale massacres of Alawite civilians.⁴⁰, ⁴¹

The violence was methodical and explicitly sectarian. According to a detailed report by Human Rights Watch, government forces swept through more than 30 Alawite-majority towns and villages.⁴⁰

The question “Are you Alawi?” often served as a death sentence.⁴⁰, ⁴²

Between 1,400 and 1,500 civilians were killed, with some estimates reaching over 3,000.¹¹, ⁴⁰, ⁴³ The atrocities were characterized by extreme brutality, including summary executions, looting, and the torching of property.⁴⁰, ⁴¹ These events represent the single most significant refutation of his rebranding efforts. They were not isolated incidents but a widespread and systematic campaign of identity-based killing.

C. Implications for Regional Trust and Local Fear

This record of sectarian cleansing has profound implications. For Israel, a neighboring regime that engages in such atrocities is an existential concern, making genuine trust impossible.⁴⁴, ⁴⁵ For other Arab states, the massacres render al-Sharaa’s regime a pariah.

Most importantly, for Syria’s own citizens, the violence is a terrifying message. It demonstrates that belonging to the wrong sect or perceived dissent can be a capital offense. This creates a pervasive environment of fear that undermines any prospect of national reconciliation. This was a foundational act of state formation through terror, designed to consolidate power by eliminating perceived enemies.

The Political Pivot: The Break from Al-Qaeda and the Rise of HTS

A. The 2016 Split: Pragmatism or Principle?

In July 2016, al-Sharaa publicly announced he was severing ties with Al-Qaeda. He rebranded the Al-Nusra Front as Jabhat Fateh al-Sham (JFS).²⁹, ⁴⁶, ⁴⁷ This move was driven by strategic pragmatism, not a change in principle.

By 2016, the Al-Qaeda brand had become a liability. It prevented a merger with other powerful Syrian Islamist groups, like Ahrar al-Sham.⁴⁶ It also provided the legal justification for the United States and Russia to target his group with airstrikes.⁴⁶

The split was therefore a calculated survival tactic. By shedding the global brand, al-Sharaa aimed to embed his organization more deeply within the local Syrian insurgency. This rebranding was also a necessary precondition for any future international engagement and financial aid.¹¹

B. The Al-Qaeda Remnant: Hurras al-Din

Al-Sharaa’s break from Al-Qaeda was not universally accepted and led to a schism. The faction that remained loyal to Ayman al-Zawahiri coalesced and, in February 2018, formally announced a new group: Tanzim Hurras al-Din (HaD), or the “Guardians of the Religion Organization”.²⁹, ⁴⁸

HaD was formed by Al-Qaeda hardliners, including senior figures who had served in Al-Nusra.⁴⁹ This group explicitly rejected al-Sharaa’s “Syria-first” project. HaD has since operated as Al-Qaeda’s official affiliate in Syria, carrying out attacks and continuing to advocate for attacks against the West.⁴⁹, ⁵⁰ The subsequent conflict between HTS and HaD was a violent internal purge, in which al-Sharaa crushed his ideological rivals to consolidate his own authority.²³, ⁵¹

C. The U.S. Terrorist Designation and Republican Views

The United States government has consistently viewed al-Sharaa and his organizations as terrorist entities. The Al-Nusra Front was first designated in December 2012 under the Obama administration.⁵², ⁵³ In May 2013, al-Sharaa was individually named a Specially Designated Global Terrorist, with a $10 million reward later offered for his capture.³¹, ⁵⁴

These designations typically have strong bipartisan support. At the time, Republicans in Congress were highly critical of the Obama administration’s Syria policy, often arguing it was not doing enough to counter extremist groups.⁵³ There is no evidence to suggest any Republican opposition to the designation.

The apparent contradiction of Republican President Donald Trump meeting with al-Sharaa in May 2025 must be understood in context.⁵⁵ This diplomatic engagement occurred after al-Sharaa had overthrown the Assad regime. The meeting was a pragmatic step to engage with the new de facto power. Critically, this overture did not remove al-Sharaa or HTS from U.S. lists of designated terrorists at that time.⁵⁵, ⁵⁶

Conclusion: An Assessment of Ahmed al-Sharaa

A. The Unchanged Core: A Pragmatic Jihadist

The evidence strongly supports the conclusion that Ahmed al-Sharaa is not a “changed man.” Instead, he is a highly intelligent, adaptable, and ruthless political actor who has evolved his tactics to suit a changing strategic landscape. His core objective—the establishment of a Sunni Islamic state in Syria under his absolute authority—appears to remain unchanged.

His public renunciations of global jihad and his rhetoric of inclusion are best understood as calculated maneuvers. They are designed to secure his regime, obtain the lifting of sanctions, and prevent foreign military intervention. The systematic massacres of Alawite civilians in March 2025 serve as the ultimate, chilling evidence that his capacity for extreme brutality remains fully intact. He has not abandoned the tools of terror; he has merely learned to deploy them more strategically.

B. Future Outlook and Enduring Threats

The primary threat posed by al-Sharaa’s regime is not necessarily an immediate resumption of transnational terrorism. His current focus is on domestic governance, security, and economic reconstruction, which require a degree of international acquiescence.¹¹, ¹² However, the ideological DNA of his movement and the thousands of hardened jihadist fighters who form his power base constitute a significant long-term threat.

His rule is predicated on the loyalty of these fighters. Should his political project falter or come under existential threat, a reversion to the terrorist tactics that brought him to power remains a distinct possibility. His commitments to moderation are tactical and, therefore, reversible. The deep-seated distrust of his motives is a prudent conclusion based on a comprehensive review of his career. For Syria and the international community, the critical question is not whether the man has changed, but for how long his current pragmatic persona will serve his ultimate ambitions.

---

Works Cited

1. Wikipedia. “Ahmed al-Sharaa.” Accessed October 16, 2025. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ahmed_al-Sharaa
2. Wikipedia. “Ahmed al-Sharaa.” Accessed October 16, 2025. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ahmed_al-Sharaa
3. Smith, Martin. “The Jihadist Transcript.” PBS Frontline. Accessed October 16, 2025. https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/frontline/documentary/the-jihadist/transcript/
4. Encyclopædia Britannica. “Ahmed al-Sharaa.” Last updated October 15, 2025. https://www.britannica.com/biography/Ahmed-al-Sharaa
5. Mamo, Alessio. “Who is Abu Mohammed al-Jolani, leader of Syrian insurgents HTS?” The Guardian. December 6, 2024. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2024/dec/06/who-is-abu-mohammed-al-jolani-leader-of-syrian-insurgents-hts
6. Zelin, Aaron Y. “What to Know About the Man Who Toppled Assad.” The Washington Institute for Near East Policy. December 9, 2024. https://www.washingtoninstitute.org/policy-analysis/what-know-about-man-who-toppled-assad
7. The White House Archives. “Fact Sheet: The Vicious, Global, and Unchanging Ideology of Al Qaeda.” July 24, 2007. https://georgewbush-whitehouse.archives.gov/news/releases/2007/07/20070724-9.html
8. Wikipedia. “Al-Qaeda in Iraq.” Accessed October 16, 2025. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Al-Qaeda_in_Iraq
9. United Nations Security Council. “Al-Qaida in Iraq.” Last updated June 3, 2014. https://main.un.org/securitycouncil/en/sanctions/1267/aq_sanctions_list/summaries/entity/al-qaida-in-iraq
10. Wikipedia. “Ahmed al-Sharaa.” Accessed October 16, 2025. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ahmed_al-Sharaa
11. Brennan, Margaret. “Syrian President Ahmed al-Sharaa on his hopes for the country.” CBS News / 60 Minutes. October 13, 2025. https://www.cbsnews.com/news/syrian-president-ahmed-al-sharaa-hopes-for-country-60-minutes-transcript/
12. Court, Andy, et al. “Syrian President Ahmed al-Sharaa’s journey from al Qaeda to rebuilding his country after rebellion.” CBS News. October 13, 2025. https://www.cbsnews.com/news/ahmed-al-sharaa-syria-rebuilding-60-minutes/
13. Counter Extremism Project. “Abu Muhammad al-Golani.” Accessed October 16, 2025. https://www.counterextremism.com/extremists/abu-muhammad-al-golani
14. The Soufan Center. “IntelBrief: Avoiding the Next Camp Bucca.” March 21, 2019. https://thesoufancenter.org/intelbrief-avoiding-the-next-camp-bucca/
15. The Soufan Center. “TSG IntelBrief: From Bucca to Kobani: The Hybrid Ideology of the Islamic State.” October 24, 2014. https://thesoufancenter.org/tsg-intelbrief-from-bucca-to-kobani-the-hybrid-ideology-of-the-islamic-state/
16. Chulov, Martin. “Isis: the inside story.” The Guardian. December 11, 2014. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/dec/11/-sp-isis-the-inside-story
17. XCEPT. “The Importance of Prisons to Terrorist Groups and Movements.” July 25, 2022. https://www.xcept-research.org/the-importance-of-prisons-to-terrorist-groups-and-movements/
18. Chulov, Martin. “Isis: the inside story.” The Guardian. December 11, 2014. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/dec/11/-sp-isis-the-inside-story
19. Smith, Martin. “Interview: Abu Mohammad al-Jolani.” PBS Frontline. February 2021. https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/frontline/interview/abu-mohammad-al-jolani/
20. United Nations Security Council. “Abu Mohammed al-Jawlani.” Last updated November 14, 2023. https://main.un.org/securitycouncil/en/sanctions/1267/aq_sanctions_list/summaries/individual/abu-mohammed-al-jawlani
21. National Counterterrorism Center. “Al-Nusrah Front.” Accessed October 16, 2025. https://www.dni.gov/nctc/groups/al_nusrah_front.html
22. Zelin, Aaron Y., and Matthew Levitt. “How Hayat Tahrir al-Sham Landed on U.S. Terrorist Lists—and Why It Should Stay There for Now.” The Washington Institute for Near East Policy. December 17, 2024. https://www.washingtoninstitute.org/policy-analysis/how-hayat-tahrir-al-sham-landed-us-terrorist-lists-and-why-it-should-stay-there-now
23. Wikipedia. “Hay’at Tahrir al-Sham.” Accessed October 16, 2025. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hay%27at_Tahrir_al-Sham
24. GOV.UK. “Proscribed terrorist groups or organisations.” Last updated May 26, 2023. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/proscribed-terror-groups-or-organisations–2/proscribed-terrorist-groups-or-organisations-accessible-version
25. U.S. House of Representatives Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence. “Benghazi Report Appendix 1.” Accessed October 16, 2025. https://intelligence.house.gov/sites/intelligence.house.gov/files/documents/benghazi%20report%20appendix%201.pdf
26. U.S. Congress. “The Security Failures of Benghazi.” December 19, 2012. https://www.congress.gov/event/112th-congress/house-event/LC2350/text
27. U.S. House of Representatives Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence. “Investigative Report on the Terrorist Attacks on U.S. Facilities in Benghazi, Libya.” November 21, 2014. https://intelligence.house.gov/sites/intelligence.house.gov/files/documents/benghazi%20report.pdf
28. U.S. Senate Select Committee on Intelligence. “Review of the Terrorist Attacks on U.S. Facilities in Benghazi, Libya.” January 15, 2014. https://www.intelligence.senate.gov/2014/01/15/press-senate-intelligence-committee-releases-declassified-bipartisan-report-benghazi-terrorist/
29. Al-Haj, M. “How Syrians View Nusra’s Split from al-Qaeda.” Atlantic Council. August 4, 2016. https://www.atlanticcouncil.org/blogs/syriasource/how-syrians-view-nusra-s-split-from-al-qaeda/
30. United States Institute of Peace. “Syria Timeline: The Uprising Against Assad.” Accessed October 16, 2025. https://www.usip.org/syria-timeline-uprising-against-assad
31. U.S. Department of State. “Terrorist Designation of Al-Nusrah Front Leader Muhammad Al-Jawlani.” May 16, 2013. https://2009-2017.state.gov/r/pa/prs/ps/2013/05/209499.htm
32. Smith, Martin. “Interview: Abu Mohammad al-Jolani.” PBS Frontline. February 2021. https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/frontline/interview/abu-mohammad-al-jolani/
33. United Nations Security Council. “Al-Nusrah Front for the People of the Levant.” Last updated June 3, 2014. https://main.un.org/securitycouncil/en/sanctions/1267/aq_sanctions_list/summaries/entity/al-nusrah-front-for-the-people-of-the-levant
34. Wellen, Russ. “Jabhat al-Nusra a Greater Threat to Syria Than Islamic State.” Foreign Policy in Focus. December 9, 2015. https://fpif.org/jabhat-al-nusra-greater-threat-syria-islamic-state/
35. U.S. Department of State. “Terrorist Designation of Al-Nusrah Front Leader Muhammad Al-Jawlani.” May 16, 2013. https://2009-2017.state.gov/r/pa/prs/ps/2013/05/209499.htm
36. Australian Parliament House. “Jabhat al-Nusra.” June 26, 2013. https://www.aph.gov.au/DocumentStore.ashx?id=5339c83c-5b19-4c0f-ba23-2491056eed87&subId=32001
37. Wikipedia. “Al-Nusra Front.” Accessed October 16, 2025. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Al-Nusra_Front
38. Schenker, David. “Syria’s Druze Under Threat.” The Washington Institute for Near East Policy. June 18, 2015. https://www.washingtoninstitute.org/policy-analysis/syrias-druze-under-threat
39. Schenker, David. “Syria’s Druze Under Threat.” The Washington Institute for Near East Policy. June 18, 2015. https://www.washingtoninstitute.org/policy-analysis/syrias-druze-under-threat
40. Human Rights Watch. “‘Are You Alawi?’: Identity-Based Killings During Syria’s Transition.” September 23, 2025. https://www.hrw.org/report/2025/09/23/are-you-alawi/identity-based-killings-during-syrias-transition
41. Human Rights Watch. “‘Are You Alawi?’: Identity-Based Killings During Syria’s Transition.” September 23, 2025. https://www.hrw.org/report/2025/09/23/are-you-alawi/identity-based-killings-during-syrias-transition
42. Wikipedia. “2025 massacres of Syrian Alawites.” Accessed October 16, 2025. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2025_massacres_of_Syrian_Alawites
43. Christian Solidarity International. “Syria: Systematic persecution of Alawites.” June 11, 2025. https://www.csi-int.org/news/syria-systematic-persecution-of-alawites/
44. Doha Institute for Graduate Studies. “Israel’s Policy in post-Assad Syria.” March 11, 2025. https://www.dohainstitute.org/en/PoliticalStudies/Pages/israeli-policy-on-syria-after-fall-of-assad-regime.aspx
45. Cafiero, Giorgio, and Emily Milliken. “Why al-Sharaa’s success in Syria is good for Israel.” Atlantic Council. May 21, 2025. https://www.atlanticcouncil.org/blogs/menasource/why-al-sharaas-success-in-syria-is-good-for-israel/
46. Al-Haj, M. “How Syrians View Nusra’s Split from al-Qaeda.” Atlantic Council. August 4, 2016. https://www.atlanticcouncil.org/blogs/syriasource/how-syrians-view-nusra-s-split-from-al-qaeda/
47. Al-Haj, M. “How Syrians View Nusra’s Split from al-Qaeda.” Atlantic Council. August 4, 2016. https://www.atlanticcouncil.org/blogs/syriasource/how-syrians-view-nusra-s-split-from-al-qaeda/
48. Wikipedia. “Hurras al-Din.” Accessed October 16, 2025. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hurras_al-Din
49. Australian Government, National Security. “Hurras al-Din.” Last updated September 8, 2022. https://www.nationalsecurity.gov.au/what-australia-is-doing/terrorist-organisations/listed-terrorist-organisations/hurras-al-din
50. National Counterterrorism Center. “Hurras al-Din.” Accessed October 16, 2025. https://www.dni.gov/nctc/terrorist_groups/hurras.html
51. Wikipedia. “Hay’at Tahrir al-Sham.” Accessed October 16, 2025. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hay%27at_Tahrir_al-Sham
52. Lister, Charles. “No, the United States Isn’t Dropping Syria’s Jihadis From Its Terror List.” The Century Foundation. May 18, 2017. https://tcf.org/content/commentary/no-united-states-isnt-dropping-syrias-jihadis-terror-list/
53. Roberts, Dan. “US blacklists Syria’s al-Nusra Front as terrorist group.” The Guardian. December 11, 2012. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2012/dec/11/us-blacklists-syria-al-nusra-front-terrorist
54. Smith, Martin. “Syrian Militant and Former Al Qaeda Leader Seeks Wider Acceptance in First Interview With U.S. Journalist.” PBS Frontline. June 1, 2021. https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/frontline/article/abu-mohammad-al-jolani-interview-hayat-tahrir-al-sham-syria-al-qaeda/
55. Roggio, Bill. “President Trump meets with a Specially Designated Global Terrorist, lifts sanctions on Syria.” FDD’s Long War Journal. May 15, 2025. https://www.longwarjournal.org/archives/2025/05/president-trump-meets-with-a-specially-designated-global-terrorist-lifts-sanctions-on-syria.php
56. Roggio, Bill. “President Trump meets with a Specially Designated Global Terrorist, lifts sanctions on Syria.” FDD’s Long War Journal. May 15, 2025. https://www.longwarjournal.org/archives/2025/05/president-trump-meets-with-a-specially-designated-global-terrorist-lifts-sanctions-on-syria.php