Torrid Holdings Inc. (CURV): An Analysis of Financial Distress and Strategic Viability

Executive Summary: Navigating Financial Precarity

Torrid Holdings Inc. (NYSE: CURV) is not on the immediate verge of a Chapter 11 bankruptcy filing.¹ However, the company exhibits severe signs of financial instability. This places it in a highly vulnerable position.

A comprehensive review of its financial statements, risk models, and market indicators reveals that bankruptcy is a significant and tangible risk. The company’s future now depends on a high-risk turnaround strategy. This strategy is designed to combat its rapidly deteriorating financial health. The success of this radical pivot, executed amidst challenging economic and competitive pressures, will determine whether the company achieves solvency or faces insolvency.

Management’s path to solvency rests on three foundational pillars:²

• A “shrink to grow” mandate. This involves a drastic reduction of its physical retail footprint to stop cash losses from underperforming stores.
• A decisive pivot to a digital-first model. This e-commerce-centric approach aims to align with customer behavior.
• A re-engineering of its product mix. This involves focusing on higher-margin sub-brands to restore profitability.

Torrid’s path forward is exceptionally narrow. Its survival is contingent upon flawless execution. Most critically, the company must generate substantial free cash flow beginning in fiscal 2026.² This cash is desperately needed to service its high debt load and fortify a weakened balance sheet.³

Significant execution risks are the primary variables that will determine the outcome. These risks center on customer retention after mass store closures and the ability to achieve targeted margin expansion.² The result will determine whether this strategic pivot leads to a sustainable recovery or culminates in financial failure.

Analysis of Financial Health and Bankruptcy Risk

A granular examination of Torrid’s financial condition reveals a company under significant and systemic strain. Distress signals manifest across its operational performance, balance sheet, cash flow, and external credit assessments.

A. Income Statement & Profitability Crisis

The most immediate signs of trouble are evident in the company’s deteriorating performance. A consistent trend of declining sales and compressing margins points to a core business model that is struggling.

• Revenue and Sales Decline: Torrid is experiencing a persistent contraction in sales. For the second quarter of fiscal 2025, net sales fell 7.7% year-over-year (YoY) to $262.8 million.⁴ This accelerated a negative trend that included a 4.9% decline in Q1 2025⁵ and a 6.1% decline in Q4 2024.⁶ A 6.9% decline in comparable sales in Q2 2025 further calls the health of existing operations into question.⁴
• Margin Compression: This top-line weakness has directly eroded profitability. The gross profit margin contracted significantly, falling from 38.7% in Q2 2024 to 35.6% in Q2 2025.⁴ The impact on the bottom line has been dramatic. Net income plummeted from $8.3 million to just $1.6 million in the same period, a drop of over 80%.⁴ The decline in Adjusted EBITDA was equally stark, falling from $34.6 million to $21.5 million.⁴
• Guidance Revisions: Management has been forced to lower its financial outlook. The revised full-year 2025 guidance now projects net sales between $1.015 billion and $1.030 billion and Adjusted EBITDA between $80 million and $90 million.⁴ These downward revisions confirm that negative trends are expected to continue.

The consistent decline in sales and profitability indicates a fundamental problem. The core business model no longer generates sufficient earnings to support its operations.

B. Balance Sheet Vulnerabilities and Liquidity Strain

The operational weakness has inflicted severe damage on Torrid’s balance sheet. This transition from an income statement crisis to balance sheet fragility reveals a company with a precarious financial structure, characterized by negative working capital and strained liquidity.

• Negative Working Capital: Torrid’s short-term financial health is in a critical state. The company operates with negative working capital of approximately -$39.1 million.⁷ Its current ratio stands at a concerning 0.83, while the quick ratio is a dangerously low 0.09.³ These figures indicate the company lacks sufficient liquid assets to cover its short-term obligations.
• Stockholder’s Deficit: A stockholder’s deficit of -$201.12 million starkly illustrates the erosion of value.³ This means the company’s total liabilities exceed the book value of its total assets. This is a severe sign of financial distress that underscores how historical operations have destroyed capital.
• Debt and Liquidity Position: The company carries a substantial total debt load of $435.55 million.³ At the end of Q2 2025, management reported total liquidity of $111.7 million.⁴ An analyst must view this figure in the context of the company’s significant debt service requirements. S&P Global Ratings reports that Torrid faces annual cash outlays of approximately $52.5 million for interest and mandatory principal amortization.⁸ This leaves a very thin cushion of liquidity.
• The Liquidity Feedback Loop: This dynamic creates a dangerous feedback loop. As operational performance weakens and cash flow turns negative, the liquidity buffer is depleted. A “springing fixed-charge coverage covenant” on the company’s credit facility magnifies this risk.⁸ If EBITDA falls below a certain threshold, this covenant could trigger. This would restrict or even eliminate Torrid’s ability to draw on its credit line at the precise moment it is most needed. This creates a potential spiral where poor performance tightens liquidity, which in turn constrains the company’s ability to invest in its turnaround. The balance sheet is therefore severely compromised, leaving the company with minimal capacity to absorb further operational shocks.

The following table illustrates the negative trajectory of Torrid’s key financial metrics. It highlights the accelerating decline in performance that has led to the current balance sheet vulnerabilities.

Key Financial Health Metrics (Trend Analysis)	Q2 2024	Q3 2024	Q4 2024	Q1 2025	Q2 2025
Net Sales (in millions)	$284.6⁹	$282.5 (est.)⁴	$275.6⁶	$266.0⁵	$262.8⁴
Gross Margin (%)	38.7%⁹	N/A	33.6%⁶	38.1%⁵	35.6%⁴
Net Income (in millions)	$8.3⁹	N/A	-$3.0⁶	$5.9⁵	$1.6⁴
Adjusted EBITDA (in millions)	$34.6⁹	$24.5 (est.)⁴	$16.7⁶	$27.1⁵	$21.5⁴
Cash Flow from Operations (in millions)	$68.4 (YTD)⁹	N/A	$77.4 (FY)⁶	-$18.0 (Qtr)⁵	-$2.3 (YTD)⁴
Total Debt (in millions)	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	$435.6³
Working Capital (in millions)	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	-$39.1⁷
Current Ratio	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	0.83³
Total Liquidity (in millions)	$153.8⁹	N/A	$158.0⁶	$141.0⁵	$111.7⁴

Note: Q3 2024 guidance used for est. values. Working Capital based on TTM data for Z-Score calculation. ‘N/A’ indicates data was not available in the reviewed quarterly reports for the specified period. Data compiled from.⁴,⁵,⁶,⁷,⁹

C. Cash Flow Dynamics: The Ultimate Solvency Indicator

Perhaps the most alarming signal is the collapse of operating cash flow. For a retailer, generating cash from core operations is the ultimate measure of sustainability.

For the six-month period ending August 2, 2025, the company reported net cash used in operating activities of -$2.3 million.⁴ This represents a dramatic reversal from the same period in the prior year, when the company generated $68.4 million in cash from operations.⁴

This swing of over $70 million from a strong cash generator to a cash burner is a primary indicator that the core business is no longer financially self-sustaining. S&P corroborates this finding, noting a $6 million free operating cash flow (FOCF) deficit in the first half of fiscal 2025.⁸ This shift is a critical red flag. It signals that day-to-day operations are draining financial resources, increasing reliance on debt, and depleting the ability to self-fund a recovery.

D. Predictive Models and Credit Assessment

Quantitative bankruptcy models and professional credit assessments confirm the severity of Torrid’s financial situation.

• Altman Z-Score Deconstruction: Torrid’s Altman Z-Score, a formula used to predict bankruptcy, is 1.84. This score places it in the “Grey Zone” and indicates financial stress.⁷ A score below 1.81 would place it in the “Distress Zone,” where bankruptcy probability within two years is historically over 80%.⁷ The score is heavily weighted down by a history of accumulated losses and a fragile balance sheet. This suggests the current crisis is the culmination of long-term value destruction, making a turnaround more challenging.

This deconstruction of the Z-Score’s components reveals the specific areas of acute financial risk. Historical losses and poor liquidity weigh heavily on the overall score.

Altman Z-Score Component Breakdown	Ratio Name	Formula	Calculated Value	Interpretation/Significance
X1	Working Capital / Total Assets	$WC/TA$	-0.0944	Severe Liquidity Crisis. The negative value directly reflects the company’s negative working capital and inability to meet short-term obligations.
X2	Retained Earnings / Total Assets	$RE/TA$	-0.7812	History of Accumulated Losses. This highly negative value indicates the company has burned through all historical profits and destroyed significant capital over its life.
X3	EBIT / Total Assets	$EBIT/TA$	0.0907	Low Asset Profitability. A low but positive value showing that the company’s asset base is generating very poor returns.
X4	Market Value of Equity / Total Liabilities	$MVE/TL$	0.2916	High Leverage, Low Market Confidence. The market value of equity provides only a small cushion against total liabilities, signaling high insolvency risk.
X5	Sales / Total Assets	$S/TA$	2.5771	High Asset Turnover. The only strong component, indicating efficient sales generation from assets, but it is insufficient to offset the other severe weaknesses.
Final Score	Altman Z-Score	$Z = 1.2X_1 + 1.4X_2 + 3.3X_3 + 0.6X_4 + 1.0X_5$	1.84	“Grey Zone” – High Financial Stress. The company is teetering on the edge of the “Distress Zone.”

Data compiled from.⁷

• S&P Credit Rating Analysis: In September 2025, S&P Global Ratings downgraded Torrid’s issuer credit rating to ‘B-‘. It also revised its outlook to “negative”.⁸ A ‘B-‘ rating signifies that the entity is “more vulnerable to adverse business, financial, and economic conditions.” The “negative outlook” explicitly signals a significant risk of a further downgrade. S&P stated that it could lower the rating if Torrid’s liquidity position deteriorates. This could lead the agency to “view the capital structure as unsustainable”.⁸ This is a direct warning from a premier credit agency about the company’s long-term solvency risk.

E. Market-Based Indicators of Distress

The financial markets have delivered a clear verdict on Torrid’s prospects. Its equity valuation and investor sentiment reflect a high degree of perceived risk.

• Stock Price Collapse: The most visible indicator of distress is the collapse of Torrid’s stock price. The stock has fallen over 55% in the past year.³ It is down over 92% from its all-time high, representing a massive destruction of shareholder value.¹⁰ The market values the company’s equity at approximately $158-$170 million.¹¹ This is just over one-third of its outstanding debt of $435.55 million.³ This is a classic valuation profile for a distressed company, where the stock trades more like a speculative option on a high-risk turnaround.
• High Short Interest: Bearish sentiment among sophisticated investors is evident in the company’s short interest data. The off-exchange short volume ratio has frequently exceeded 60% and on some days has surpassed 70%.¹² This indicates that a significant volume of trading is driven by investors actively betting that the stock price will continue to decline.
• Negative Analyst Consensus: The professional analyst community shares this pessimistic view. The consensus rating on the stock is “Reduce”.¹³ Goldman Sachs maintains a “Sell” recommendation, and multiple analysts have repeatedly lowered their price targets.¹⁴,¹⁵ The market has clearly priced in a high probability of failure, reflecting deep skepticism about the viability of the company’s turnaround plan.

Torrid’s Strategic Pivot: A Blueprint for Solvency

In response to this severe financial pressure, Torrid’s management has initiated a multi-faceted strategic overhaul. The plan is designed to stabilize the business by fundamentally reshaping its operational footprint, sales channels, and product offering.

A. The ‘Shrink to Grow’ Mandate: Store Fleet Rationalization

The cornerstone of the turnaround strategy is a radical reduction of the company’s physical retail presence.

• The Plan: Management plans to close up to 180 underperforming stores during fiscal 2025. This represents a substantial downsizing of nearly 30% of the total store base.² As of the end of Q2 2025, 59 of these closures were complete, with approximately 120 more planned for the second half of the year.¹⁶
• Strategic Rationale: The primary objective is to achieve significant cost savings. The company will eliminate fixed costs like rent and labor from unprofitable locations.¹⁷ This move is also a direct response to evolving consumer behavior. It allows the company to reallocate capital toward its growing digital channel.²
• Projected Financial Impact: The financial targets are ambitious. Management projects that cost savings from store closures will be a primary driver of 150 to 250 basis points of Adjusted EBITDA margin expansion. They also expect a “substantive increase in free cash” beginning in fiscal 2026.²
• Critical Risk – Customer Retention: This “shrink to grow” strategy is a high-stakes gamble. Its success depends entirely on retaining customers from closed stores by migrating their spending online. Management has set a target of retaining at least 60% of these customers’ sales.²To mitigate this risk, management has implemented a “more robust retention strategy.” This involves proactive, multifaceted customer outreach before, during, and after a store closure. The goal is to seamlessly transition shoppers to its online platform.²However, this remains the single greatest execution risk. Many customers in a fit-sensitive category like plus-size apparel may prefer competitors with a physical presence over shifting to Torrid’s website. Some employees reportedly learned of the closures via social media, which could also inflict brand damage that hampers retention efforts.¹⁸

B. The Digital-First Imperative

Concurrent with reducing its physical footprint, Torrid is pivoting to an e-commerce-centric business model.

• The Shift: The store rationalization enables a broader strategic shift to a digital-led growth model. This is an acknowledgment that e-commerce now constitutes nearly 70% of total demand.²
• Investment in Growth: To fuel this transition, management is increasing its digital marketing budget by an incremental $5 million for the remainder of fiscal 2025. This raises total marketing spend to approximately 6% of net sales.² This investment targets “top-of-funnel” marketing to build brand awareness and attract new customers.²The success of this investment will depend on the company’s ability to meticulously track its return. It must move beyond top-of-funnel awareness to measure key performance indicators such as customer acquisition cost, conversion rates, and the lifetime value of new customers. This increased spend will place further pressure on limited liquidity, creating a race against time for the investment to generate profitable revenue.
• Omnichannel Strategy: The strategy is not a complete abandonment of physical retail. The goal is to create a leaner, more effective omnichannel ecosystem. The company will revamp 135 of its most important remaining locations to create a more attractive in-store experience and better showcase new products.¹⁹

C. Re-engineering the Product Mix for Profitability

A third critical component of the plan is to improve profitability through changes in the product assortment.

• Sub-Brand Focus: Management is emphasizing the development of new, higher-margin sub-brands.² These collections are reportedly receiving a positive market response. They are expected to be a key driver of profitability, as they can be sold at or near full price.²
• Addressing Core Product Misses: The company has acknowledged “short-term product misses” that have dragged down performance, particularly in the tops category.²⁰ The strategy involves correcting these assortment errors while increasing investment in categories that have shown strength, such as bottoms, dresses, and swimwear.²⁰
• Margin Halo Effect: The introduction of new sub-brands is intended to create a “halo effect” that lifts the performance of the entire business. By drawing customers in with new collections, the company aims to drive higher attachment rates for its core categories.² The success of this effect can be measured by tracking attachment rates of core products in transactions that also include new sub-brands, as well as monitoring any corresponding increase in overall average order value.²

D. Capital Allocation and Balance Sheet Fortification

The final piece of the strategy addresses the company’s precarious financial structure. It focuses on using cash from the operational turnaround to repair the balance sheet.

• Stated Priorities: Management has been explicit about its capital allocation priorities. It will deploy future free cash flow to “reduce debt and repurchase shares”.² This dual focus creates an inherent tension.This decision is critical. Credit rating agencies like S&P have explicitly warned that the capital structure could be viewed as ‘unsustainable’ if liquidity deteriorates further.⁸ Prioritizing debt reduction would directly address these solvency concerns and lower interest expense. Buybacks support the equity value but consume cash that could otherwise fortify the balance sheet.
• Debt Management: Torrid has taken proactive steps to manage its debt profile. It extended the maturity of its ABL facility to 2030, which provides some medium-term breathing room.¹⁹ However, the ultimate goal is to actively de-lever the balance sheet through cash payments.
• Share Repurchases: The company has an active $100 million share repurchase authorization, with approximately $45 million remaining.² The company has utilized this authorization, including a $20 million repurchase of 6 million shares at $3.50 per share.¹⁹ This action supports the equity value but is a direct use of cash that could otherwise be applied to debt reduction.

Competitive Landscape and Market Headwinds

Torrid must execute its difficult turnaround while navigating a dynamic plus-size apparel market and contending with significant external risks.

A. The Plus-Size Apparel Market: A Growing but Challenging Arena

• Market Growth: The plus-size clothing market is a significant and growing segment. It was valued at over $291 billion in 2022 and is projected to grow to over $488 billion by 2032, expanding at a CAGR of 5.90%.²¹ This growth is underpinned by demographic reality. The average woman’s size in the U.S. is now between 16 and 18, placing Torrid’s target demographic of sizes 10 to 30 squarely within the mainstream.²²
• Key Trends and Challenges: The market is propelled by social tailwinds like the body positivity movement.²¹ However, this growth has also attracted a flood of competition. Torrid’s core challenge is its transition from a niche leader to a survivor in a hyper-competitive market. Mainstream giants like Old Navy, Nike, Target, and Walmart are aggressively expanding their size ranges.²²,²³ These new entrants possess vastly greater scale and marketing budgets, fundamentally altering the competitive landscape. Torrid’s survival now depends on proving that its specialized focus on fit and fashion offers a superior value proposition that larger competitors cannot easily replicate.

B. Peer Group Analysis: A Sector Under Pressure

An analysis of Torrid’s direct competitors reveals a broader specialty apparel sector facing significant pressure. This table provides a snapshot of how Torrid compares to its peers on key valuation and financial health metrics.

Peer Financial Comparison	Torrid (CURV)	Designer Brands (DBI)	The Children’s Place (PLCE)	Duluth Holdings (DLTH)	Citi Trends (CTRN)
Market Cap (in millions)	$175.5²⁴	$186.8²⁴	$150.7²⁴	$129.9²⁴	$245.1²⁴
Enterprise Value (in millions)	$589.5²⁴	$1,500.0²⁴	$709.1²⁴	$310.2²⁴	$412.2²⁴
P/S Ratio (TTM)	0.17²⁴	0.06²⁴	0.09²⁴	0.20²⁴	N/A
Debt / EBITDA	3.12³	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A
Current Ratio	0.83³	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A
Gross Margin (%)	35.8%³	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A

Data compiled from.³,²⁴

The history of the plus-size specialty sector provides a stark roadmap of potential failure. The 2020 Chapter 11 bankruptcy of Ascena Retail Group, former parent of competitors Lane Bryant and Catherines, is a crucial cautionary tale.²⁵,²⁶ Ascena’s collapse was attributed to several factors that mirror Torrid’s current challenges:²⁶

• A heavy debt load
• Years of weak sales
• An over-reliance on a declining mall-based retail model

This pattern of distress, bankruptcy, and consolidation underscores the sector’s volatility. It highlights the immense difficulty of succeeding with a leveraged balance sheet and a large brick-and-mortar footprint in the modern retail environment. Following the bankruptcy, Lane Bryant was sold to Sycamore Partners,²⁵ and Catherines was acquired at auction by FullBeauty Brands.²⁷ Another competitor, Eloquii, was acquired by Walmart only to be sold off to FullBeauty Brands in 2023.²⁸

C. External Risk Factors

Beyond competition, Torrid’s turnaround is vulnerable to external factors.

• Tariffs and Supply Chain: Management has identified tariffs as a significant headwind. The company anticipates up to a $50 million gross impact from tariffs. Even after mitigation strategies, it still expects up to a $15 million negative impact on Adjusted EBITDA in fiscal 2025.⁴ This is a direct threat to its already strained profitability.
• Macroeconomic Pressures: As a seller of discretionary goods, Torrid is highly exposed to the broader economy. Company filings and the S&P credit report highlight risks from “weaker consumer discretionary spending,” inflation, and rising interest rates.⁸,²⁹ An economic downturn could derail the recovery plan regardless of how well it is executed. These external factors pose a significant threat that could undermine the turnaround strategy even if it is executed well internally.

Conclusive Outlook: Viability, Risks, and Final Assessment

This analysis leads to a nuanced conclusion. Torrid is in a state of severe financial distress, and the risk of bankruptcy is real and significant. However, bankruptcy is not an immediate inevitability. Management has formulated a credible, albeit high-risk, strategic plan that offers a viable, if narrow, path back to solvency.

The success of this turnaround is not guaranteed. Management must flawlessly and forcefully execute on several critical fronts:

1. Achieve Customer Retention Targets: The company must successfully migrate at least 60% of sales from its 180 closed stores to its digital channel. Failure here will result in a permanent and crippling loss of revenue that cost savings cannot offset.²
2. Deliver Margin Expansion: The company must realize its target of 150-250 basis points of Adjusted EBITDA margin expansion. This requires both successful cost-cutting and profitable growth from new sub-brand initiatives.²
3. Generate Positive Free Cash Flow: Most critically, Torrid must reverse its current operating cash burn. It must begin generating substantial positive free cash flow in fiscal 2026 to de-lever its balance sheet and reduce its high debt service burden.²

For investors, the most important metrics to watch will be comparable sales, gross margin trends, customer acquisition costs, online conversion rates, and, above all, quarterly cash flow from operations.

In conclusion, Torrid’s ability to remain solvent is a race against time. The company must execute its complex operational turnaround and begin generating cash before its liquidity buffer is exhausted or its debt covenants are triggered. The next four to six quarters will be critical in determining its ultimate fate.

While the strategy is sound, the execution risk is exceptionally high. This risk is compounded by an uncertain macroeconomic environment and intense competition. An investment in Torrid Holdings Inc. at this juncture is a highly speculative endeavor. It is suitable only for investors with a deep understanding of the risks involved and a very high tolerance for potential loss.

---

Works Cited

1. Torrid Holdings Inc. “Stock Info.” investors.torrid.com. Accessed October 14, 2025. https://investors.torrid.com/stock-info/default.aspx.
2. “Torrid Holdings Inc. (CURV) Q2 2026 Earnings Call Transcript.” Seeking Alpha. September 4, 2025. https://seekingalpha.com/article/4819785-torrid-holdings-inc-curv-q2-2026-earnings-call-transcript.
3. “Torrid Holdings (CURV) Statistics & Valuation.” StockAnalysis.com. Accessed October 14, 2025. https://stockanalysis.com/stocks/curv/statistics/.
4. Torrid Holdings Inc. “Torrid Reports Second Quarter 2025 Results.” investors.torrid.com. September 4, 2025. https://investors.torrid.com/news/news-details/2025/Torrid-Reports-Second-Quarter-2025-Results/default.aspx.
5. Torrid Holdings Inc. “Torrid Reports First Quarter 2025 Results.” investors.torrid.com. June 5, 2025. https://investors.torrid.com/news/news-details/2025/Torrid-Reports-First-Quarter-2025-Results/default.aspx.
6. Torrid Holdings Inc. “Torrid Reports Fourth Quarter and Fiscal 2024 Results and Initiates Fiscal 2025 Guidance.” investors.torrid.com. March 20, 2025. https://investors.torrid.com/news/news-details/2025/Torrid-Reports-Fourth-Quarter-and-Fiscal-2024-Results-and-Initiates-Fiscal-2025-Guidance/default.aspx.
7. “Altman Z-Score for CURV.” GuruFocus. Accessed October 14, 2025. https://www.gurufocus.com/term/zscore/CURV.
8. S&P Global Ratings. “Torrid LLC Downgraded To ‘B-‘, Outlook Revised To Negative On Weaker Cash Flow.” September 26, 2025. https://www.spglobal.com/ratings/en/regulatory/article/-/view/type/HTML/id/3448607.
9. Torrid Holdings Inc. “Torrid Reports Second Quarter Fiscal 2024 Results.” investors.torrid.com. September 6, 2024. https://investors.torrid.com/news/news-details/2024/Torrid-Reports-Second-Quarter-Fiscal-2024-Results/default.aspx.
10. “Torrid Holdings Inc. (CURV) Stock Price & Chart.” TradingView. Accessed October 14, 2025. https://www.tradingview.com/symbols/NYSE-CURV/.
11. “Torrid Holdings Inc. Common Stock (CURV) Stock Price, Quote, News & History.” Nasdaq. Accessed October 14, 2025. https://www.nasdaq.com/market-activity/stocks/curv.
12. “CURV – Torrid Holdings Inc. Stock – Share Price, Short Interest, Short Squeeze, Borrow Rates.” Fintel. Accessed October 14, 2025. https://fintel.io/ss/us/curv.
13. “Torrid Holdings Inc. (NYSE:CURV) Receives Average Rating of ‘Reduce’ from Analysts.” MarketBeat. September 20, 2025. https://www.marketbeat.com/instant-alerts/torrid-holdings-inc-nysecurv-given-average-rating-of-reduce-by-analysts-2025-09-20/.
14. “Torrid Holdings Inc. (CURV) – Analyst Ratings.” Fintel. Accessed October 14, 2025. https://fintel.io/sfo/us/curv.
15. Quiver Quantitative. “New Analyst Forecast: $CURV Given $1.6 Price Target.” Moomoo. September 18, 2025. https://www.moomoo.com/news/post/58687299/new-analyst-forecast-curv-given-1-6-price-target.
16. “Torrid Holdings Inc. SEC 10-Q Report.” TradingView News. September 11, 2025. https://www.tradingview.com/news/tradingview:21f2c4912fefc:0-torrid-holdings-inc-sec-10-q-report/.
17. “Torrid Holdings Closes 57 Stores in Q2.” Nasdaq. September 4, 2025. https://www.nasdaq.com/articles/torrid-holdings-closes-57-stores-q2.
18. O’Neil, B. “Here’s the Horrible Way Torrid Workers Learned About Store Closures.” TheStreet. June 10, 2025. https://www.thestreet.com/retail/heres-the-horrible-way-torrid-workers-learned-about-store-closures.
19. “Torrid Holdings Closes 57 Stores in Q2.” Nasdaq. August 4, 2025. https://www.nasdaq.com/articles/torrid-holdings-closes-57-stores-q2.
20. “Torrid Holdings Inc. (CURV) Q2 2025 Earnings Call Transcript.” Seeking Alpha. September 4, 2025. https://seekingalpha.com/article/4819785-torrid-holdings-inc-curv-q2-2025-earnings-call-transcript.
21. “Plus Size Clothing Market Summary.” Market Research Future. Accessed October 14, 2025. https://www.marketresearchfuture.com/reports/plus-size-clothing-market-20671.
22. “Plus-Size Fashion Market: When and How to Extend Your Size Range.” StyleArcade. Accessed October 14, 2025. https://www.stylearcade.com/blog/plus-size-fashion-market-when-and-how-to-extend-your-size-range.
23. “Plus-size Clothing Market Size To Reach $412.39Bn By 2030.” Grand View Research. Accessed October 14, 2025. https://www.grandviewresearch.com/press-release/global-plus-size-clothing-market.
24. “Similar to CURV.” Seeking Alpha. Accessed October 14, 2025. https://seekingalpha.com/symbol/CURV/peers/comparison.
25. “Lane Bryant.” Wikipedia. Accessed October 14, 2025. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lane_Bryant.
26. “Ann Taylor and Lane Bryant owner files for Chapter 11 bankruptcy.” CBS News. July 24, 2020. https://www.cbsnews.com/news/lane-bryant-ann-taylor-loft-bankruptcy-chapter-11-ascena-retail-group-catherines/.
27. Howland, D. “FullBeauty’s $41M bid wins Catherines plus brand at auction.” Retail Dive. September 17, 2020. https://www.retaildive.com/news/fullbeautys-41m-bid-wins-catherines-plus-brand-at-auction/585499/.
28. Howland, D. “Plus brand Eloquii the latest to leave Walmart’s DTC portfolio.” Retail Dive. April 21, 2023. https://www.retaildive.com/news/plus-brand-eloquii-the-latest-to-leave-walmarts-dtc-portfolio/648305/.
29. Torrid Holdings Inc. “Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended August 3, 2024.” U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. September 11, 2024. https://s28.q4cdn.com/785376639/files/doc_financials/2024/q2/5d256104-f233-4a76-82a1-e8aaeed4a835.pdf.