Tesla’s Robotaxi Rollout: An In-Depth Analysis of Ambition vs. Reality

Executive Summary

The perception that Tesla’s robotaxi rollout has been quiet is accurate. This muted public profile is not the result of a lack of activity. Instead, it is a direct consequence of a controlled, limited, and highly contested debut. This launch stands in stark contrast to nearly a decade of ambitious promises.

The significant “expectation gap” between the grand vision and the initial reality has been a key factor in shaping perception. This gap manifested in volatile stock performance and heightened media scrutiny following the launch.¹ The service did not launch as a widespread public offering. It began as a small, invite-only pilot program confined to geofenced areas in Austin, Texas, and later, the San Francisco Bay Area.²,³ Several critical factors necessitated this limited scope.

Immediately upon its launch on June 22, 2025, documented performance issues and significant safety incidents beset the service. These included instances of wrong-way driving and traffic violations.⁴ These events attracted swift and intense scrutiny from federal regulators. This culminated in a formal investigation by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) into the underlying Full Self-Driving (FSD) technology.⁵ This regulatory pressure has effectively constrained any potential for rapid scaling.

Technologically, the robotaxi service operates on FSD software that Tesla officially classifies as a “Supervised”system. This creates a core contradiction, as the “Supervised” designation explicitly requires active human oversight and does not make the vehicle autonomous.⁶ A fundamental gap exists between its current capabilities and the requirements of a truly driverless commercial service.

Furthermore, Tesla is entering the U.S. market as a distant follower to the established leader, Waymo, whose operational scale vastly exceeds Tesla’s current pilot.⁷,⁸ The recent collapse of another major competitor, Cruise, serves as a stark cautionary tale against premature deployment in this safety-critical industry.⁹,¹⁰

The combination of these factors has mandated a cautious, controlled rollout. This explains the relative public silence observed since the launch day.

1. The Genesis of a Multi-Trillion Dollar Ambition: A History of Promises

To fully comprehend the 2025 robotaxi launch, it is essential to examine the long history of Tesla’s promises. This history has shaped investor expectations and public discourse. It created a significant “expectation gap” between the grand vision and the operational reality of the initial rollout. This gap directly impacts investor confidence and creates challenges for managing public perception, leading to volatile stock reactions and intense media criticism when realities fall short of promises.¹

The Foundational Vision (2016)

CEO Elon Musk first laid the conceptual groundwork for Tesla’s robotaxi ambitions in July 2016. He published his “Master Plan, Part Deux,” which introduced the idea of a “Tesla Network.”¹¹ This network would be a shared fleet of autonomous vehicles. The plan envisioned a future where owners could add their cars to this network with a tap of a button. The vehicle could then generate income for them while they were at work or on vacation.² This concept was revolutionary. It reframed the car from a depreciating asset into a potential revenue-generating one. It also established the robotaxi initiative as a cornerstone of Tesla’s long-term strategy.

The 2019 “Autonomy Day” Proclamation

The pivotal moment that cemented the robotaxi narrative occurred during Tesla’s “Autonomy Day” in April 2019. Musk made a series of audacious claims to investors that set an incredibly high bar. He declared with confidence that Tesla would have one million robotaxis on the road by 2020. He stated this feat would be achieved through a simple over-the-air software update.¹¹,¹² He further claimed these robotaxis would generate up to $30,000 per year in profit for their owners.¹² This specific, aggressive, and ultimately unmet deadline became a primary source of both investor excitement and public skepticism.

The Intervening Years (2020-2024)

The period following the 2020 deadline was characterized by delays and recalibrated timelines. These changes demonstrated the immense technical and regulatory challenges that the company had underestimated. Instead of a million-vehicle network, Tesla initiated a slow rollout of its “Full Self-Driving (FSD) Beta” program in October 2020.¹² This program, which put Tesla’s city-street self-driving software in customers’ hands for the first time, remained in a “beta” phase for years and required constant driver supervision.

Discussions of a dedicated, purpose-built robotaxi vehicle continued during this time but with shifting timelines. A 2022 promise to unveil a vehicle in 2023 with production in 2024 was also missed.¹¹

The “Cybercab” Unveiling (2024)

Tesla finally gave form to the vision for a dedicated vehicle in October 2024. At an event, the company unveiled the “Cybercab,” a futuristic, two-seater vehicle designed for autonomous ride-hailing with no steering wheel or pedals.⁴,²,¹¹ Musk stated that production would “probably” begin before 2027 with a target price under $30,000.¹¹ The unveiling highlighted Tesla’s dual-track strategy: using existing consumer vehicles for the initial service launch while developing a specialized vehicle for mass-scale deployment.⁴,²

This nearly decade-long narrative built an expectation of a disruptive, world-changing event. This history of ambitious promises created a significant ‘expectation gap,’ making the eventual launch of a small, invite-only pilot in Austin, Texas, a stark contrast to years of anticipation. The “quietness” of the rollout is the sound of a scaled-back operational reality colliding with years of amplified promises.

2. The Austin Pilot: A Controlled and Contested Debut

After years of anticipation, Tesla’s robotaxi service commenced with a carefully controlled and immediately contested pilot program. The operational reality in Austin, Texas, provided a stark contrast to the grand vision. It was defined by a limited scope, the constant presence of human monitors, and a series of performance challenges that emerged within hours of its debut.

Operational Status: A Limited, Monitored Trial

The service officially began on a “tentative” date of June 22, 2025, in Austin.³,¹³ CEO Elon Musk’s own language signaled a cautious approach. He stated, “We are being super paranoid about safety, so the date could shift”.³

The pilot program’s structure reflected this cautiousness. The service was invite-only, with access granted to a select group of Tesla shareholders, employees, and social media influencers.⁴ The fleet consisted of a small number of modified Tesla Model Y “Juniper” vehicles, estimated to be between 10 and 20 cars.²

Crucially, every ride included a human safety monitor employed by Tesla. Initially, these monitors sat in the front passenger seat.² However, in a significant operational shift on September 3, 2025, Tesla moved the monitors in the Austin fleet to the driver’s seat.⁴

A limited expansion of the service began in the San Francisco Bay Area around July 31, 2025. From the start of that pilot, the safety monitor was positioned in the driver’s seat, indicating that the lessons from Austin were quickly applied.³

Launch Week Performance: A Tale of Two Narratives

The first days of the Austin pilot produced two starkly different narratives.

On one hand, the curated narrative from many invited early riders was overwhelmingly positive. Social media posts praised the experience as “extremely smooth,” “confident,” “comfortable,” and “surreal”.¹⁴,¹⁵ This feedback highlighted the vehicle’s ability to navigate common driving challenges successfully.¹⁵

On the other hand, other riders simultaneously documented a more troubling reality. Within the first 48 hours, a series of critical safety incidents and operational flaws were recorded and shared publicly. These included⁴:

• Wrong-Way Driving: A robotaxi was documented swerving across double yellow lines into an unoccupied lane for oncoming traffic. The vehicle drove the wrong way for several seconds before correcting its path.
• Traffic Violations: Multiple riders documented their robotaxis exceeding posted speed limits.
• Erratic Behavior: One vehicle’s steering wheel jerked violently through an intersection. Another robotaxi braked hard and unnecessarily while passing stationary police cars.
• Operational Flaws: A robotaxi was filmed pulling into a designated handicapped parking space to pick up a passenger.

These documented failures quickly attracted the attention of federal regulators. On June 23, 2025, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) confirmed it was “aware of the referenced incidents and is in contact with the manufacturer to gather additional information”.⁴ This immediate regulatory response underscored the seriousness of the initial performance issues.

The following table provides a chronological anchor for the events of the launch period.

Date	Event	Location	Significance	Source(s)
June 22, 2025	Service launch (limited, invite-only)	Austin, TX	Marks the official start of the pilot program.	², ¹³
June 22-23, 2025	Multiple safety incidents documented	Austin, TX	Reports of wrong-way driving, speeding, and erratic braking emerge from first riders.	⁴
June 23, 2025	NHTSA confirms contact with Tesla	Washington, D.C.	Federal regulators begin investigating launch day incidents.	⁴
July 31, 2025	Service expansion to Bay Area	SF Bay Area, CA	Expansion occurs with safety monitor in the driver’s seat from the start.	³
September 3, 2025	Safety monitor moved to driver’s seat	Austin, TX	Operational posture shifts, suggesting a need for faster intervention.	⁴
October 9, 2025	NHTSA launches formal investigation	Washington, D.C.	A formal investigation into FSD for traffic safety violations is announced.	⁵

3. The Technology Underpinning the Service: FSD’s Evolution to “Robotaxi-Lite”

The performance of Tesla’s robotaxi service is intrinsically linked to its underlying technology: the Full Self-Driving (FSD) software suite. An analysis of the software reveals a fundamental contradiction at the heart of the “driverless” service. It also shows a development strategy that appears to be retrofitting a consumer-grade product for a demanding commercial application.

FSD (Supervised): The Foundation

The robotaxi fleet operates on Tesla’s FSD software. It is critical to note that Tesla officially designates this system as “FSD (Supervised)”.⁶ The company’s own documentation explicitly states that the “currently enabled features require active driver supervision and do not make the vehicle autonomous”.⁶ This classification as a Level 2 driver-assistance system directly conflicts with the premise of a “robotaxi” service. While the pilot program uses a human monitor to fulfill this supervisory role, the core technology was not designed from the ground up as a fully autonomous system.

The FSD v14.1 Update: Building “Robotaxi-Lite” Features

In early October 2025, Tesla began rolling out FSD version 14.1 to consumer vehicles. This update aimed to bring the consumer FSD experience closer to the system being tested in the robotaxi pilot.¹⁶,¹⁷

The features introduced are foundational capabilities required for any functional robotaxi service. The fact that Tesla is adding them after launching the pilot demonstrates that the company is retrofitting its existing product. The term “robotaxi-lite” aptly captures this strategy.¹⁷ This approach is distinct from competitors like Waymo and Cruise, who pursued full autonomy as a separate, dedicated endeavor.¹⁸,¹⁹ This distinction is critical. Building a system for full autonomy from the ground up involves different design principles and safety validation processes compared to retrofitting a consumer-grade, supervised system.

Key “robotaxi-lite” features introduced in FSD v14.1 include¹⁶:

• Arrival Options: This feature gives the system the ability to navigate the final, complex portion of a trip by allowing it to park in specific locations, such as a Parking Lot or at the Curbside.
• Emergency Vehicle Handling: The update added specific logic for handling encounters with emergency vehicles, programming the car to pull over or yield.
• Enhanced Navigation and Obstacle Avoidance: The system’s ability to handle real-world complexities was improved, with better performance in navigating around blocked roads and road debris.
• New Speed Profiles: Tesla introduced a new, more conservative “Sloth” speed profile, which utilizes lower speeds and more cautious lane selection.

This development approach helps explain the system’s inconsistent performance. While it may excel at certain human-like driving maneuvers, it appears to lack the foundational robustness required for a commercial service.

The Camera-Only Debate

A defining and controversial aspect of Tesla’s strategy is its reliance on a camera-only sensor suite, a system it calls “Tesla Vision”.² Unlike competitors, Tesla has deliberately eschewed LiDAR and radar sensors.²⁰,¹⁹ Experts continue to raise serious questions about the safety of a camera-only approach. Documented failures for vision-only systems include difficulty identifying objects during sun glare or in low-visibility conditions like fog.²¹,²²,²³ For instance, a 2016 fatal crash investigated by the NTSB occurred when the Autopilot system failed to identify a white tractor-trailer against a brightly lit sky.²⁴,²⁵ This unique technological choice remains a key point of contention.

4. Navigating the Gauntlet: Regulatory Scrutiny and Public Perception

Tesla’s robotaxi service is not rolling out in a vacuum. It is unfolding under a microscope of intense regulatory scrutiny and within a polarized public discourse. These external pressures have become formidable obstacles to the program’s expansion.

The NHTSA Investigation: A Formal Inquiry into Systemic Flaws

On October 9, 2025, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) announced it was opening a formal investigation into nearly 2.9 million Tesla vehicles equipped with FSD.⁵

The investigation’s stated purpose is to determine whether the FSD system has “induced vehicle behaviour that violated traffic safety laws”.⁵ This language suggests the agency is looking beyond individual failures to assess if the system’s fundamental design leads to unsafe actions. The specific incidents cited by NHTSA are severe⁵:

• Red Light Violations and Crashes: The agency received six reports of FSD-engaged vehicles running red lights and being involved in intersection crashes.
• Wrong-Way Driving: The investigation is also examining complaints of vehicles entering opposing lanes of traffic.
• Failure to Stop: NHTSA identified 18 complaints alleging that vehicles failed to stop fully at red lights or intersections.
• Lack of Warnings: Some complainants reported that the FSD system provided no warning of its intended unsafe behavior.

This preliminary evaluation is the first formal step in a process that could lead to a mandatory recall.⁵ A company cannot realistically pursue an aggressive, nationwide expansion while its core technology is under a high-profile federal investigation. The “quietness” of the rollout is a forced operational reality. The NHTSA investigation acts as a de facto brake on scalability.

Beyond federal scrutiny, Tesla must also navigate a complex patchwork of state-level regulations. As of 2025, there is no uniform national framework for autonomous vehicles. Different states have established their own rules for testing, deployment, and liability, adding another layer of complexity to any national expansion plan.²⁶,²⁷

Preemptive Concerns and Public Divide

Regulatory anxiety predates the official launch. In the weeks leading up to the June 22 debut, Texas lawmakers publicly urged Tesla to postpone the rollout until a new state law regulating autonomous vehicles took effect.²⁸ This action signaled a lack of confidence among some policymakers.

Public reception has been sharply divided. Enthusiastic supporters have lauded the technology’s potential.²⁹,¹⁵ On the other side, critics and safety advocates point to the documented failures and the ongoing federal investigation as clear evidence that the technology is not ready for public roads without a human driver.³⁰,³¹

Direct, side-by-side comparisons have reinforced this divide. One review detailed a user’s experience taking eight Waymo rides with zero safety-critical incidents, contrasted with five Tesla rides that resulted in three incidents.³¹ Such comparisons have solidified the narrative among skeptics that Tesla’s system remains significantly less mature than its primary competitor.

Underlying these debates are profound ethical questions. Issues of liability in an accident, the programming of vehicles to make choices in unavoidable crashes, and the challenge of balancing innovation against public safety remain largely unresolved.³²,³³

5. The Competitive Arena: A Race Tesla is Not Yet Winning

To accurately assess Tesla’s robotaxi rollout, it is essential to place it within the context of the broader U.S. market. This competitive lens makes it clear that Tesla is a new entrant in a sector with an established leader and a significant, recent failure that serves as a cautionary tale.

Waymo (The Incumbent Leader): The Gold Standard of Operations

Waymo, which originated as the Google Self-Driving Car Project, is the undisputed leader in the U.S. robotaxi market.

• Operational Scale and Public Access: As of mid-2025, Waymo operates full commercial, public-facing robotaxi services in five major metropolitan areas: Phoenix, San Francisco, Los Angeles, Austin, and Atlanta.⁷,³⁴ Its service is open to the general public through the Waymo One app or, in some cities, the Uber app.³⁴
• Ride Volume and Fleet Size: Waymo’s operational scale dwarfs Tesla’s pilot. As of April 2025, Waymo was providing over 250,000 paid rides per week.⁷ Its commercial fleet consists of over 1,500 vehicles.⁸
• Technological Maturity: Waymo’s system has been under development for over a decade and has operated commercially since October 2020.³⁵ Its vehicles rely on a multi-modal sensor suite that includes cameras, LiDAR, and radar, providing layers of redundancy absent in Tesla’s camera-only approach.¹⁹

Cruise (The Cautionary Tale): The Price of Failure

The story of Cruise, the autonomous vehicle subsidiary of General Motors, serves as a stark warning. For a time, Cruise was a leading contender, launching a commercial, driverless service in San Francisco in 2022.³⁶ At its peak, Cruise operated in multiple cities and completed up to 10,000 autonomous rides per week.³⁷

However, the company’s expansion came to a catastrophic halt in October 2023. Following a horrific incident in San Francisco where a Cruise vehicle struck and dragged a pedestrian, the California DMV suspended the company’s operating permits.⁹ This triggered a complete collapse of trust. Cruise halted all nationwide operations. In December 2024, GM announced it would no longer fund Cruise’s robotaxi development, effectively ending its run as a major competitor.⁹,¹⁰

The lesson from Cruise’s failure is clear: in the safety-critical domain of autonomous vehicles, a “move fast and break things” ethos is a recipe for disaster.

The following table provides a direct comparison that illustrates the vast gap between Tesla’s pilot program and Waymo’s established commercial service.

Metric	Tesla Robotaxi	Waymo One
Service Status	Limited, invite-only pilot program	Full commercial service, open to the public
Operational Cities	Austin, TX; SF Bay Area, CA (limited)	Phoenix, AZ; San Francisco, CA; Los Angeles, CA; Austin, TX; Atlanta, GA
Weekly Ride Volume	~600 rides per week (estimated from first two weeks of Austin pilot)³⁸	250,000+ paid rides per week
Fleet Size	~10-20 vehicles (estimated)	1,500 – 2,000+ vehicles
Core Sensor Tech	Cameras only (“Tesla Vision”)	Cameras, LiDAR, and Radar
Safety Monitor	Yes, in passenger or driver’s seat	No (fully driverless in operational areas)
Commercial Launch	June 2025 (Pilot)	October 2020 (Full Commercial)
Sources	³⁸	⁷, ⁸

6. Future Trajectory: Scaling the Vision Amidst Market Realities

The ultimate success of Tesla’s robotaxi initiative will be determined by its ability to transition from a small pilot program into a scaled, profitable mobility network. This path requires reconciling the company’s immense ambitions with the formidable hurdles that define its current reality.

The Grand Vision

Tesla’s long-term vision remains as ambitious as ever. The company intends to expand the service rapidly, with a goal of launching in “a dozen cities” in the United States by the end of 2025, pending regulatory approvals.⁴ The long-term target of deploying 1 million robotaxis remains a central part of the company’s narrative.³⁹

This expansion is planned to be accelerated by the purpose-built Cybercab, slated for initial production in 2026 and volume production in 2027.⁴

The success of this vision is the fundamental linchpin of Tesla’s entire financial narrative and its extraordinary market valuation. Analyst projections are predicated on Tesla transforming from a car manufacturer into a high-margin mobility-as-a-service provider. This transformation is the justification for aggressive long-term targets, including a potential new compensation plan for Elon Musk tied to achieving market capitalization goals of up to $8.5 trillion.³⁹,⁴⁰

The Market Realities and Hurdles

Despite the grandeur of the vision, the path to achieving it is fraught with significant challenges.

• The Regulatory Gauntlet: The regulatory environment is skeptical and demanding. Scaling to a dozen cities by the end of 2025 seems highly improbable while the core technology is under federal investigation. Each new jurisdiction will present its own unique set of approval processes.⁴¹
• The Technological Chasm: The FSD software must make the monumental leap from a “Supervised” Level 2 system to a true Level 4 or 5 fully autonomous system. This is a technological chasm that has taken competitors like Waymo over a decade to cross.⁴¹,²⁰
• Capital and Competition: Expanding a robotaxi fleet is an incredibly capital-intensive endeavor. The financial model relies heavily on the Cybercab, but its delayed production timeline (2026/2027) postpones economic benefits and has contributed to investor skepticism and significant stock market volatility.⁴²,⁴³ In the interim, Tesla must fund the expansion while competing with Waymo, a well-funded and mature incumbent.⁴¹

In conclusion, the Tesla robotaxi service is the ultimate test of the company’s valuation and its narrative of technological disruption. The current stock price reflects a future in which the robotaxi network is a resounding success. The current operational reality, however, shows that this success is far from guaranteed. The limited, troubled pilot in Austin represents the very first, tentative step on a long and arduous journey. The “quietness” of the rollout is a direct reflection of the immense distance between the present reality and the promised future.

---

Works Cited

1. Sensika. “Tesla Robotaxi: How Media Signals Move the Market.” Sensika Blog. Accessed October 11, 2025. https://sensika.com/blog/tesla-robotaxi-how-media-signals-move-the-market/
2. Wikipedia. “Tesla Robotaxi.” Last modified 2025. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tesla_Robotaxi
3. Ali, Iqtidar. “Elon Musk Gives Robotaxi and Self-Delivery Launch Dates, Driverless Tesla Model Y Spotted in Austin.” Tesla Oracle. June 13, 2025. https://www.teslaoracle.com/2025/06/13/elon-musk-gives-robotaxi-and-self-delivery-launch-dates-driverless-tesla-model-y-spotted-in-austin/
4. Wikipedia. “Tesla Robotaxi.” Last modified 2025. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tesla_Robotaxi
5. The Guardian. “Tesla cars with full self-driving tech face US regulators’ investigation.” October 9, 2025. https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2025/oct/09/tesla-cars-self-driving-us-regulators-investigation
6. Tesla, Inc. “Full Self-Driving (Supervised).” Tesla.com. Accessed October 11, 2025. https://www.tesla.com/fsd
7. Wikipedia. “Waymo.” Last modified 2025. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Waymo
8. Waymo. “Scaling our fleet through U.S. manufacturing.” Waymo Blog. May 2025. https://waymo.com/blog/2025/05/scaling-our-fleet-through-us-manufacturing
9. Wikipedia. “Cruise (autonomous vehicle).” Last modified 2025. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cruise_(autonomous_vehicle
10. Miller, Caleb. “General Motors Gives Up on Its Cruise Robotaxi Dreams.” Car and Driver. December 11, 2024. https://www.caranddriver.com/news/a63158982/general-motors-cruise-robotaxi-dead/
11. Reddit User Submission. “History of Tesla Robotaxi Announcements.” r/RealTesla. 2025. https://www.reddit.com/r/RealTesla/comments/1iwxh29/history_of_tesla_robotaxi_announcements/
12. The Dawn Project. “The History of Tesla Full Self-Driving.” Accessed October 11, 2025. https://dawnproject.com/the-history-of-tesla-full-self-driving/
13. Lee-Jones, Sarah. “Tesla Robotaxi Launch Date: June 22 Says Elon Musk.” TeslaNorth.com. June 10, 2025. https://teslanorth.com/2025/06/10/tesla-robotaxi-launch-date-june-22-says-elon-musk/
14. Ali, Iqtidar. “Tesla Robotaxi Austin launch was a success (rider reviews).” Tesla Oracle. June 23, 2025. https://www.teslaoracle.com/2025/06/23/tesla-robotaxi-austin-launch-was-a-success-rider-reviews/
15. Teslarati. “Tesla Robotaxi riders tout ‘smooth’ experience in first reviews of driverless service launch.” Teslarati. June 23, 2025. https://www.teslarati.com/tesla-robotaxi-riders-tout-smooth-experience-reviews/
16. Alvarez, Simon. “Tesla Full Self-Driving v14.1 first impressions: Robotaxi-like features arrive.” Teslarati. October 8, 2025. https://www.teslarati.com/tesla-full-self-driving-v14-1-first-impressions-robotaxi-like-features-arrive/
17. Burnett, Stewart. “New Tesla FSD update aims for robotaxi-lite experience.” Automotive World. October 7, 2025. https://www.automotiveworld.com/articles/new-tesla-fsd-update-aims-for-robotaxi-lite-experience/
18. Reddit User Submission. “From a technical perspective, what are the differences between Waymo/Cruise and Tesla?” r/SelfDrivingCars. 2025. https://www.reddit.com/r/SelfDrivingCars/comments/18rfia9/from_a_technical_perspective_what_are_the/
19. Reddit User Submission. “Kyle talks pros and cons of Waymo and Tesla.” r/SelfDrivingCars. 2025. https://www.reddit.com/r/SelfDrivingCars/comments/1lkcco0/kyle_talks_pros_and_cons_of_waymo_and_tesla/
20. Templeton, Brad. “Robotaxi Timeline.” Robocars. Accessed October 11, 2025. https://www.templetons.com/brad/robocars/timeline.html
21. EVHype. “Tesla’s FSD Struggles—Is Vision-Only Enough?” EVHype. 2025. https://evhype.com/teslas-fsd-struggles-is-vision-only-enough/
22. MacheForum User Submission. “Real world Tesla camera-based safety self-driving tech vs. LiDAR.” MacheForum.com. 2025. https://www.macheforum.com/site/threads/real-world-tesla-camera-based-safety-self-driving-tech-vs-lidar.43920/page-3
23. The Last Driver License Holder. “Camera versus Lidar.” The Last Driver License Holder. June 25, 2025. https://thelastdriverlicenseholder.com/2025/06/25/camera-versus-lidar/
24. The Associated Press. “Tesla Autopilot limitations played big role in fatal crash.” CBC News. September 13, 2017. https://www.cbc.ca/news/science/tesla-autopilot-crash-ntsb-1.4287026
25. Ramey, Jay. “Tesla Autopilot limitations played role in deadly crash, NTSB says.” Autoweek. September 13, 2017. https://www.autoweek.com/news/technology/a1830321/tesla-autopilot-limitations-played-role-deadly-crash-ntsb-says/
26. Baker Donelson. “Autonomous Vehicle Statutes and Regulations Across the 50 States.” BakerDonelson.com. 2025. https://www.bakerdonelson.com/autonomous-vehicle-statutes-and-regulations-across-the-50-states
27. National Conference of State Legislatures. “Autonomous Vehicles Legislation Database.” NCSL.org. March 10, 2025. https://www.ncsl.org/transportation/autonomous-vehicles-legislation-database
28. Picchi, Aimee. “Tesla’s robotaxi service to launch in Austin, Texas, on June 22.” CBS News. June 22, 2025. https://www.cbsnews.com/news/tesla-robotaxi-launch-austin-texas-elon-musk-june-22/
29. Market Report Analytics. “Tesla’s Robotaxi Service Debuts in Austin: Early Wins and Growing Pains.” Market Report Analytics. 2025. https://www.marketreportanalytics.com/news/article/58549
30. Reddit User Submission. “My first Tesla robotaxi ride – autonomous rideshare in Austin.” r/SelfDrivingCars. 2025. https://www.reddit.com/r/SelfDrivingCars/comments/1mnhqv9/my_first_tesla_robotaxi_ride_autonomous_rideshare/
31. Reddit User Submission. “I tested Tesla and Waymo’s robotaxis in Austin — only one felt ready for the future.” r/SelfDrivingCars. 2025. https://www.reddit.com/r/SelfDrivingCars/comments/1mqvv4b/i_tested_tesla_and_waymos_robotaxi_in_austin/
32. ResearchGate. “Ethical Considerations in the Development and Implementation of Artificial Intelligence for Autonomous Vehicles.” ResearchGate. 2025. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/382878640_Ethical_Considerations_in_the_Development_and_Implementation_of_Artificial_Intelligence_for_Autonomous_Vehicles
33. Montreal AI Ethics Institute. “The Ethical Considerations of Self-Driving Cars.” Montreal AI Ethics Institute. 2025. https://montrealethics.ai/the-ethical-considerations-of-self-driving-cars/
34. Quartz. “Here’s where you can hail a robotaxi in the U.S.” Quartz. 2025. https://qz.com/where-robotaxi-waymo-operating-us-2025
35. Wikipedia. “Self-driving car.” Last modified 2025. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Self-driving_car
36. The Robot Report. “Cruise First to Launch L4 Robotaxi Service in Major US City.” The Robot Report. 2022. https://www.therobotreport.com/rbr50-company-2022/cruise-first-to-launch-l4-robotaxi-service-in-major-us-city/
37. Wessling, Brianna. “GM will no longer fund Cruise’s robotaxi development.” The Robot Report. December 10, 2024. https://www.therobotreport.com/rbr50-company-2022/cruise-first-to-launch-l4-robotaxi-service-in-major-us-city/
38. Tesla Accessories. “Tesla Robotaxi Service Debuts in Austin: Early Wins and Growing Pains.” Teslaacessories.com. 2025. https://www.teslaacessories.com/blogs/news/tesla-robotaxi-service-debut-in-austin-early-wins-growing-pains
39. Investing.com. “Tesla’s SWOT analysis: stock outlook amid robotaxi push and global EV competition.” Investing.com. October 8, 2025. https://www.investing.com/news/swot-analysis/teslas-swot-analysis-stock-outlook-amid-robotaxi-push-and-global-ev-competition-93CH-4278515
40. Feder, Joel. “Robotaxis, Robots, and Hope Are Tesla’s Plan To Become $8.5 Trillion Company: TDS.” The Drive. September 9, 2025. https://www.thedrive.com/news/robotaxis-robots-and-hope-are-teslas-plan-to-become-8-5-trillion-company-tds
41. Investing.com. “Tesla’s SWOT analysis: stock outlook amid robotaxi push and global EV competition.” Investing.com. October 8, 2025. https://www.investing.com/news/swot-analysis/teslas-swot-analysis-stock-outlook-amid-robotaxi-push-and-global-ev-competition-93CH-4278515
42. The Economic Times. “Cybercab flop costs Elon Musk $15 billion as Tesla shares take a dive.” October 11, 2024. https://m.economictimes.com/news/international/global-trends/cybercab-flop-costs-elon-musk-15-billion-as-tesla-shares-take-a-dive/articleshow/114286016.cms
43. Milmo, Dan. “Tesla’s value drops $60bn after investors fail to hail self-driving ‘Cybercab’.” The Guardian. October 11, 2024. https://www.theguardian.com/business/2024/oct/11/teslas-value-drops-60bn-after-self-driving-cybercab-fails-to-excite-investors