Doomscroll News 🇺🇸

Tag: MAGA

  • Kennedy’s War on the Sick System

    When it comes to dismantling the corrupt public health establishment, Robert F. Kennedy Jr. isn’t just the best solution; he is the only solution. He is the GOAT, the one leader with the courage to force the reckoning we desperately need, and that reckoning must begin at the source: the deafening, outrageous silence of Wuhan’s “bat lady,” Shi Zhengli.

    This is the central issue. While our country was shut down and our economy wrecked, the scientist at the epicenter of the gain-of-function research controversy has offered nothing. Her silence is a damning indictment of the entire corrupt, globalist enterprise that unleashed this hell on the world, a cover-up so profound that it took a group of citizen-researchers, DRASTIC, to expose the truth with the Project DEFUSE documents.

    This foundational lie infects everything that followed, especially the chaotic narrative around long COVID. We hear conflicting stories from all sides: Fauci demanding more money, Malone speaking of his own negative experience, and Gottlieb trying to normalize it. Frankly, I align with Dr. Marty Makary: the issue has been “massively exaggerated and overplayed.”

    The establishment wants us focused on fear and phantom syndromes, but the real path forward is found in strength, vitality, and personal responsibility. This is what the Kennedy/Hegseth fitness challenge is all about. It’s a positive vision for health that the failed public health bureaucrats completely ignore. Instead of pushing mandates and pills, we should be promoting metabolic health and physical readiness. If people embraced this philosophy, they would understand that a strong, healthy body is the ultimate defense.

    Now, that doesn’t mean we shouldn’t investigate the condition. We absolutely need to diagnostically probe it, especially its response to exercise, which I believe would be incredibly revealing. Full disclosure, I do sometimes invest in these types of diagnostic and therapeutic companies, so to an extent, I am talking my book. But I truly believe a rigorous, unbiased investigation will prove that the real solution lies in the personal health and fitness that Kennedy so powerfully embodies.

    This is precisely why Kennedy’s mission is so vital. He is the only leader with the courage to reject the corrupt, pharma-driven model and champion a new paradigm based on strength and individual empowerment. He’s not just fixing a broken agency; he’s leading us back to a vision of American health that is strong, resilient, and free.

    David Gross

    Follow me at https://x.com/dgapps and https://davidgrossapps.com

  • Justice KBJ: Anti-DEI, Pro-Religious Freedom, Defender of Jan. 6 Rioters … or Not?

    As I’ve been telling people since she was confirmed—and I have witnesses—Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson’s record is revealing a judicial philosophy with surprising MAGA elements. Here are a few of her rulings that prove it:

    • Ames v. Ohio Department of Youth Services (2025): Marlean Ames, a straight woman, alleged her supervisor, a lesbian, discriminated against her by favoring LGBTQ+ employees. The case centered on whether plaintiffs from majority groups had to meet a higher legal standard—showing “background circumstances” of discrimination—to bring a lawsuit. Writing for a unanimous Court, Justice Jackson ruled that Title VII forbids such a two-tiered system. The decision eliminated the “background circumstances” test, ensuring all individuals face the same evidentiary standard when alleging workplace discrimination.
    • Catholic Charities Bureau v. Wisconsin Labor & Industry Review Commission (2025): The Court unanimously sided with Catholic Charities against the state of Wisconsin, which had denied the organization a religious-employer exemption from unemployment taxes. Wisconsin argued the charity wasn’t “operated primarily for religious purposes” because it served all people, not just Catholics, and didn’t proselytize. The Court held that the state’s position violated the First Amendment by imposing a “denominational preference” and attempting to define what constitutes a valid religious activity, which the government is forbidden from doing.
    • Fischer v. United States (2024): This case questioned whether a felony obstruction charge, originally passed to prevent evidence tampering, could be broadly applied to defendants from the January 6 Capitol riot. Justice Jackson joined the conservative majority in a 6-3 decision that found prosecutors had interpreted the law too broadly. The Court ruled the law is limited to acts that impair the integrity of evidence, not any conduct that disrupts an official proceeding. This significantly narrowed the application of a key felony charge in Jan. 6 prosecutions.
    • CFPB v. Community Financial Services Association (2024): Her opinion, while far from perfect in my opinion, was a strong defense of judicial restraint, arguing that courts have no power to overrule Congress on funding matters unless the Constitution is explicitly and unambiguously violated. This reasoning champions a limited role for the judiciary, a core principle of legal conservatism.
    (more…)