Doomscroll News

Tag: Hamas

  • The UniParty Terrorist Agenda Exposed

    The UniParty Terrorist Agenda Exposed

    I have a strong aversion to Peter Hegseth because he champions The UniParty’s Vision for America: A Globalist Project to Make America a Sharia-Compliant Infidel Exclusion Zone. This summer, while he was promoting “American drones,” I discovered through metadata on an X post that his team was using CCP-made DJI drones to “secure” our border with Mexico. One of the border patrol groups inadvertently posted it. When I confronted him with this evidence, he never responded. For this reason, I also call him “Peter ‘DJI’ Hegseth”—his hypocrisy is boundless.

    The establishment—the UniParty that wants me, an Infidel, dead—pushes this agenda. Search for “Sharia” or “Sharia-compliant” on the White House website, specifically in articles like this one praising deals secured by President Trump: https://www.whitehouse.gov/articles/2025/05/what-they-are-saying-trillions-in-great-deals-secured-for-america-thanks-to-president-trump/ (Archive: http://archive.is/72BVI).

    There is a profound hypocrisy in our leadership. Figures like Obama, Trump, and Newsom laud what I consider a terrorist death cult that commands the killing of Infidels like myself, David Gross. Yet, they imprison patriots like Irwin Schiff (Peter Schiff’s father) for tax resistance. Why did Trump, a jab-pusher and Blackrock globalist, fly to meet with terrorist groups like Hamas during a government shutdown? He should stay over there if he supports the killing of infidels. He is our first full-blown Islamic Terrorist President, praised by sympathizers like Biden and Kamala. The UniParty has become synonymous with Al Qaeda.

    I also believe a corrupt element within our government is complicit. A group within the New York Department of Environmental Conservation (DEC) had pre-knowledge of the “Kirk hit.” I reported this to the FBI both before and after the event, and they did nothing. I am convinced that figures like Kash Patel, Dan Bongino, and Pam Bondi are extremely corrupt. Their inaction allowed individuals like Mohammed Sabry Soliman to be missed in Denver because they needed to protect financial interests, such as Franklin Templeton’s Sharia-compliant deals. They have an agenda to import Islamic militants, just as Clinton allowed bin Laden to operate before 9/11.

    This same pro-Hamas group in the New York DEC is actively trying to bring in more Islamic extremists. Both Mamdani and Trump are shielding terrorists and are, in my view, terrorist sympathizers. It’s no coincidence that Trump was a registered Democrat in New York City at the turn of the millennium; I believe he still owes dues to terrorists.

    It is time to stop paying taxes, following the example of Irwin Schiff.

    For those who love America, arm yourselves. This is for our country.

  • Reuters’ South Africa Lies: Predictable Deceit from an Outlet Accused of Embedding with October 7th

    Reuters’ South Africa Lies: Predictable Deceit from an Outlet Accused of Embedding with October 7th

    Those who unquestioningly accept Reuters’ take on critical global situations, like today’s alert on South Africa as an “Editor’s Picks”, should be aware of the outlet’s problematic history. Reuters has faced serious credibility issues, including publishing manipulated images during wartime and maintaining controversial policies on defining terrorism, which distort public understanding.

    1. Photographer’s Images from 2006 Lebanon War: In August 2006, Reuters had to remove all photographs by a freelance photographer, Adnan Hajj, from its database. This occurred after it was discovered that at least two of his photos from the 2006 Israel-Lebanon conflict had been digitally manipulated. One image showed smoke billowing over Beirut, which had been altered to appear darker and more dramatic. Another showed an Israeli F-16 firing missiles, with the photographer adding an extra flare to make it appear more threatening. Reuters severed ties with Hajj following these revelations.
    2. Embedded with Assailants? Serious Allegations of Reuters’ Foreknowledge in October 7th Attack Coverage: Following the October 7th attacks by Hamas on Israel, Reuters, along with other news organizations, faced scrutiny about how some freelance photojournalists, whose images were used by Reuters and others, were able to be at the scene of the attacks so early. These journalists may have had advance knowledge of the attacks. Reuters denied having any prior relationship with the freelance photographers in question and stated the published photos were taken hours after the initial attacks began and well after Israel had confirmed gunmen crossed the border. Bipartisan U.S. lawmakers sent a letter to Reuters requesting an explanation.
    3. Policy on Not Using the Word “Terrorist”: Reuters has a long-standing policy which includes generally not using the word “terrorist” or “terrorism” to describe specific events or individuals, instead opting terms like “bombers,” “gunmen,” or “militants.” This obscures the nature of such acts and the motivations behind them. Reuters’ editorial policy states they “may refer without attribution to terrorism and counterterrorism in general, but do not refer to specific events as terrorism.”
    Sent by the Reuters app at approximately 6pm on May 21, 2025.