Tag: ETF

  • Settlement Tightness and the Flywheel Effect: How Reverse Splits and ETFs Propagate Systemic Stock Market Risk

    What happens when the market’s plumbing breaks? A new report details a ‘flywheel effect’ where reverse splits and ETFs create ‘settlement tightness,’ leading to massive volatility and settlement failures. We’re digging into the data, the case studies, and what this structural risk means for all investors. Don’t miss this.

    Read the full post: https://doomscrollnews.com/settlement-tightness-market-structure-anomalies/

    Doomscroll Dispatch
    Doomscroll Dispatch
    Settlement Tightness and the Flywheel Effect: How Reverse Splits and ETFs Propagate Systemic Stock Market Risk
    Loading
    /
  • Settlement Tightness: A Forensic Investigation into Market Structure Anomalies

    Settlement Tightness: A Forensic Investigation into Market Structure Anomalies

    Executive Summary

    This report presents a forensic analysis of anomalous trading dynamics within U.S. equities. It focuses on a condition termed ‘settlement tightness.’ This state involves an acute imbalance between the supply and demand for borrowable shares. Such imbalances can precipitate significant trade settlement failures and extreme price volatility.

    The objective is to provide a clear, evidence-based framework for identifying and investigating potential market manipulation. These findings are critically significant for regulatory bodies, financial institutions, and market researchers. The report is intended for those seeking to understand and mitigate systemic risks to market integrity.

    Methodology

    This investigation uses a structured, multi-layered analytical framework.

    1. It begins by identifying specific corporate actions, like reverse stock splits, that act as catalysts.
    2. It then conducts a forensic analysis of empirical data from public sources. These sources primarily include Fails-to-Deliver (FTD) data from the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), but also prospectuses, offering documents, and other corporate filings. This data helps diagnose symptoms of market stress.
    3. Finally, the framework maps the ecosystem of financial intermediaries. This includes underwriters, placement agents, and ETF sponsors. The goal is to uncover structural interconnections and recurring patterns.

    Key Findings

    The analysis reveals a repeatable, self-reinforcing mechanism called the ‘flywheel’ effect. This effect drives settlement stress.

    • Initiation: The process begins with a reverse stock split that constricts a stock’s public float, creating scarcity.
    • Amplification: Concentrated buying pressure then amplifies this scarcity. Critically, the inclusion of the illiquid stock in thematic Exchange-Traded Funds (ETFs) also removes shares from the borrowable market, further intensifying the pressure.
    • Result: The resulting ‘settlement tightness’ leads to persistent settlement failures. This, in turn, places both the underlying stock and the related ETF on the Regulation SHO Threshold List. This creates a feedback loop of volatility and risk.

    Case Studies

    Detailed case studies of Newegg Commerce (NEGG), Intrepid Potash (IPI), and Applied UV (AUVI) illustrate the framework’s application.

    • The NEGG case demonstrates the full ‘flywheel’ in action.
    • The IPI case serves as a control, distinguishing macro-fundamental drivers from microstructure anomalies. It also highlights the need for specific FTD data to complete the analysis.
    • The AUVI case validates the framework’s utility. It shows how public data can be used to assess a company’s own allegations of illegal short selling by outlining the steps for empirical verification.

    Conclusion

    The evidence indicates that a confluence of factors can create systemic vulnerabilities. These factors include specific corporate actions, modern financial product structures, and the activities of a concentrated network of financial intermediaries. These structural weaknesses can generate extreme volatility detached from fundamental value. They can also propagate settlement risk across the market. The report concludes by recommending further investigation into ETF holdings and the network of financial intermediaries to fully assess the scope of these structural risks.

    (more…)
  • Why Cryptocurrency is a House of Cards

    In late April 2025, an elderly investor in the United States became the victim of a devastating social engineering attack. The prize for the hackers: 3,520 Bitcoin, worth over $330 million. What happened next was a masterclass in modern money laundering. The stolen funds were rapidly funneled through at least six different exchanges and swapped for Monero (XMR), a cryptocurrency famous for its promise of privacy. The massive purchases caused Monero’s price to surge by a verifiable 8.2% in just two hours, triggering such extreme volatility that some illiquid markets saw temporary intraday spikes as high as 50%.

    This single, dramatic event is more than just another crypto-theft headline. It’s a key that unlocks the door to the crypto ecosystem’s most surprising and misunderstood secrets. It peels back the curtain on the popular narratives and reveals a far more complex—and often contradictory—reality. What follows are five critical truths, drawn from academic research, leaked data, and strategic analysis, that challenge everything you think you know about digital currency.


    1. The World’s Most “Untraceable” Coin is Shockingly Easy to Trace

    For criminals and privacy purists alike, Monero (XMR) is the holy grail: a digital currency advertised as completely untraceable. It is the preferred medium of exchange on darknet markets and the ransom currency for sophisticated cybercriminal gangs. Its core promise and entire reason for being is “untraceability.”

    But a groundbreaking academic paper, “A Traceability Analysis of Monero’s Blockchain,” revealed a shockingly different reality. In a real-world analysis of Monero’s public ledger, researchers uncovered devastating flaws in its privacy protections.

    • The Zero Mix-in Flaw: Monero’s privacy relies on “mix-ins,” which are decoy transactions used to hide the real sender. The analysis found that a staggering 65.9% of all Monero inputs used zero mix-ins. Without any decoys, these transactions were trivially traceable.

    • The Cascade Effect: Each of these easily traced transactions created a domino effect. As researchers identified the real sender in one transaction, they could use that information to eliminate it as a decoy in other transactions. This “cascade effect” allowed them to de-anonymize other, seemingly protected transactions.

    The final conclusion was stunning: a passive adversary—meaning someone with access only to the public blockchain data and no special hacking tools—could trace a conclusive 88% of all Monero inputs. This massive gap between theory and practice hasn’t gone unnoticed by authorities. The U.S. Internal Revenue Service (IRS) has awarded contracts to blockchain analysis firms like Chainalysis specifically to develop Monero-tracing tools, proving that the world’s most “private” coin is anything but.

    But if the privacy is an illusion, what about the price itself? The data reveals an even more fragile foundation.


    (more…)