The Billion-Dollar Myth
/
RSS Feed
Tag: crypto
-
Analysis of Vitalik Buterin’s Influence and Communication in the 2025 Crypto Landscape
Executive Summary
This report analyzes the market influence and public communication of Ethereum co-founder Vitalik Buterin as of October 2025.
Buterin’s known Ethereum (ETH) holdings represent approximately 0.2% of the total circulating supply. This amount is insufficient to cause systemic market volatility on its own.¹ On-chain activity and public statements confirm his ETH transfers are overwhelmingly philanthropic; they are not for personal financial gain.²
A quantitative review of Buterin’s public communications reveals a significant increase in activity during 2024 and 2025.³ This contradicts the perception that he has grown silent. This perception gap stems from a broader market shift. The crypto ecosystem is now saturated with high-volume, accessible narratives from prominent figures and cultural phenomena like political meme coins.⁴ Buterin’s discourse has become more technical and specialized. While more frequent, louder narratives are overshadowing his contributions.
This analysis concludes that Buterin’s role has evolved. He is no longer a direct market actor but a long-term technical and ethical steward for the Ethereum ecosystem. His influence is now primarily exerted through his intellectual contributions, which shape the network’s development.⁵
(more…) -
Deconstructing the Crypto Market Collapse of October 10, 2025
On October 10, 2025, a single geopolitical announcement triggered the largest deleveraging event in the history of digital assets, exposing the fragile, overleveraged core of a euphoric market. This was not just a market crash; it was a Black Swan event that stress-tested the entire crypto ecosystem, revealing its deepest vulnerabilities and its surprising strengths.
Executive Summary
The cryptocurrency market was shattered on Friday, October 10, 2025, by what appeared to be a singular geopolitical shock. In reality, it was the catastrophic failure of a market structure defined by extreme leverage and paradoxical sentiment. This historic deleveraging event, the largest in the history of digital assets, demonstrated the profound systemic risks that had built up beneath a surface of bullish euphoria.
President Donald Trump’s announcement of 100% tariffs on China was the undeniable catalyst. However, this report will show that the collapse resulted from a dangerous confluence of factors. The market was primed for volatility by a widely accepted “debasement trade” narrative, where a US government shutdown was ironically seen as a tailwind for asset prices. This perception led to all-time highs for Bitcoin and an unprecedented buildup of speculative, leveraged long positions.
The tariff announcement acted as a pinprick to this overleveraged bubble, triggering a violent liquidation cascade that erased between $9.5 billion and $19 billion from derivatives markets in 24 hours.¹³, ¹⁹ On-chain analysis reveals that the decentralized derivatives exchange Hyperliquid was the primary venue for this deleveraging.¹³ Furthermore, forensic evidence points to the strategic actions of sophisticated whale traders who not only anticipated the market’s vulnerability but also positioned themselves to profit immensely from the chaos.², ¹² This suggests the event was both a market-wide panic and a predatory hunt.
The analysis concludes with an assessment of the market’s structural health in the aftermath, identifying key indicators that will define its trajectory and offering a forward-looking perspective for navigating the new paradigm.
(more…) -
The Problem: Decentralized, Trustless Last-Mile Logistics
Companies like DoorDash, Uber Eats, and Amazon Flex have solved the last-mile delivery problem using a centralized, server-based architecture. A central server, owned by the company, is the trusted intermediary that holds all the data: customer orders, restaurant/merchant locations, driver locations, driver reputations, and payment information. It acts as the “brain,” dispatching orders to drivers based on a proprietary algorithm.
From first principles, design a system that accomplishes the same goal—efficiently matching customers who want items delivered with a fleet of independent drivers—but without a central server or trusted intermediary.
Your proposed system must solve the following core problems from the ground up:
- Discovery: How does a customer’s order request get broadcast to nearby, available drivers without a central server to see everyone’s location? How does a driver “see” available orders?
- Selection & Bidding: How is a driver selected for an order? Does the customer choose? Is there a bidding system? How do you prevent a single malicious actor from accepting all orders and never completing them (a Sybil attack)?
- Reputation & Trust: Without a central database of star ratings, how is driver reputation established and verified in a decentralized manner? How can a customer trust a driver they’ve never met? How can a driver trust that the customer will pay? Reputation must be resistant to manipulation.
- Payment: How are payments processed trustlessly? The customer needs to be sure they won’t be charged until the item is delivered, and the driver needs to be sure they will be paid upon successful delivery. Design a payment-in-escrow mechanism that doesn’t rely on a central company holding the funds. Consider using smart contracts or a similar cryptographic method.
- Efficiency & Scalability: Centralized dispatch algorithms are highly optimized. How can a decentralized, peer-to-peer network achieve comparable route and batching efficiency without a god’s-eye view of the entire system? How does your system scale from a single neighborhood to a whole city?
Your answer should focus on the fundamental architecture, protocols, and incentive structures, not just the user interface of an app.
-
Precision Doctrine: Re-evaluating Digital Assets from Peacetime Liability to Wartime Strategic Reserve
David’s Note: This article was substantially revised on October 12, 2025 to incorporate new research and provide a more comprehensive analysis.
Executive Summary
This report argues that the Guiding and Establishing National Innovation for U.S. Stablecoins (GENIUS) Act represents a fundamental misinterpretation of digital asset technology’s strategic value. The Act integrates stablecoins into the peacetime financial system to foster innovation. However, this policy creates a significant national security liability. It strengthens a global infrastructure that adversaries exploit for illicit finance and sanctions evasion.
The core argument is that the technology’s decisive value is not in peacetime commerce. Instead, its highest and best use is as a strategic military asset reserved for times of declared conflict. This analysis examines the GENIUS Act, the arguments of its proponents and opponents, and the extensive evidence of security threats posed by the peacetime proliferation of cryptocurrencies.
As an alternative, this report proposes a “Wartime Digital Asset Act.” This framework would restrict the peacetime use of public cryptocurrencies. It would simultaneously develop the underlying technology as a strategic military reserve. This capability would be activated only upon a declaration of war by Congress for critical applications. These include resilient command and control, secure logistics, and wartime finance.
The report concludes that true technological leadership requires the precise application of innovation to its most decisive purpose. In this case, that purpose is to serve as a reserved instrument of national power.
(more…) -
The Phoenix Plan: A Blueprint for American Rebirth
Prioritize national strength, economic independence, and internal order.
Core Principles
- Competent Government: Before voting on any bill, members of Congress must have one week to read it and pass a test to prove they understand it.
- “Fortress America” Economy: The plan aims for a self-reliant economy. This includes:
- Taxes: Making current individual tax rates permanent while eliminating special-interest loopholes, the Child Tax Credit, and complex corporate taxes.
- Trade and Investment: Using tariffs to protect critical industries and offering residency to foreigners who make multi-million dollar investments in the U.S.
- Ending Corporate Crime: Forcing companies to be specific about how they use investor money. Seized assets from convicted executives and banks will fund their own prosecution and imprisonment.
- Nationalizing Crypto: Making all private cryptocurrency transactions illegal. The entire crypto system will be seized and reserved as a financial weapon for the military to use only during a declared war.
- Honest Money: Transitioning away from the Federal Reserve to a system where the U.S. Treasury issues debt-free money directly.
-
MY UPDATED VIEWS ON “NO TAX ON OVERTIME” AND “NO TAX ON TIPS”
A ‘no tax on overtime’ policy is a powerful and sensible tool for retaining a highly-skilled ‘varsity squad’ of experienced firefighters, for whom substantial overtime is a critical and routine part of providing for their families and ensuring public safety. However, this same policy is counterproductive and dangerous in lower-wage, hourly industries, like for a quality control inspector making $21 an hour, where it creates a perverse incentive to deliberately slow down work for a small bonus, undermining productivity. The immense benefit of properly compensating our most vital, high-stakes professionals like firefighters decisively outweighs the risk of this policy being exploited in sectors where it rewards inefficiency instead of essential skill.
This same principle… that a policy must be targeted and not a broad, exploitable mandate… is why I am holding firm on my position regarding taxes on tips. While I fully support eliminating the tax burden on tips for service industry workers, a blanket, undefined exemption would be a mistake. It risks becoming a massive, backdoor handout to the cryptocurrency world, creating a tax-free loophole for digital transactions that have nothing to do with rewarding service. Therefore, any ‘no tax on tips’ policy must include a specific, carefully crafted exception for the traditional service and hospitality industry, ensuring the benefit goes to waitstaff, bartenders, delivery drivers, barbers, etc. not to anonymous crypto transfers.