Tag: CCP

  • The California Insurrection: A Planned Betrayal

    The California Insurrection: A Planned Betrayal

    The chaos that erupted in Los Angeles is no spontaneous uprising; it is a meticulously planned and ongoing insurrection fueled by a toxic alliance of foreign enemies and domestic traitors. The betrayal runs from the streets to the highest offices of the state. It’s a conspiracy where federal taxpayer money is funneled to the very groups organizing the insurrection. This support was made explicit on August 30, 2024, when Mayor Karen Bass’s office announced she had secured major federal support for the Coalition for Humane Immigrant Rights (CHIRLA), creating a direct pipeline from the U.S. government to a key organizer of the insurrection. CHIRLA’s own action fund listed her as a supporter of the DREAM Act in late 2017.

    At the heart of the violence is the Party for Socialism and Liberation (PSL), a disciplined Marxist cadre providing the ideological framework for the insurrection; they actively engage in propaganda efforts that mirror Chinese state media, defending the CCP’s actions in Hong Kong and its internal policies. The PSL’s connection to this insurrection is not incidental; they are the ideological core, providing the anti-American framework and organizational discipline for the insurrection you see on the streets.

    (more…)
  • SPECIAL REPORT: The Case for a Complete and Total Ban of TikTok in the USA

    SPECIAL REPORT: The Case for a Complete and Total Ban of TikTok in the USA

    Introduction: A Clear and Present Danger

    The ongoing debate surrounding TikTok is not merely about a social media application; it is about national sovereignty, the security of our citizens’ data, and the integrity of our democratic discourse. For too long, the conversation has been muddled by half-measures, corporate-speak, and a fundamental misunderstanding of the adversary we face. The passage of the Protecting Americans from Foreign Adversary Controlled Applications Act (PAFACA) was a necessary first step, but it is not the final solution. Current and past efforts to mitigate the threat posed by TikTok are, and have always been, ineffective at addressing the underlying security concerns. The time for divestment negotiations and technical firewalls has passed. TikTok, a tool of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), must be banned entirely from the United States.

    The Corporate Shell Game: A Deliberate Deception

    To understand the TikTok threat, one must first dismantle the complex and deliberately opaque corporate structure of its parent company, ByteDance.

    • Cayman Islands and Delaware: Havens of Obscurity: ByteDance is not a simple tech company; it is incorporated in the Cayman Islands, a jurisdiction notorious for financial secrecy. This is not an accident. It is a calculated move to obscure ownership and evade American oversight, a direct contradiction to the “America First” principles our nation must embody. Furthermore, its U.S. entity, TikTok Inc., is registered in Delaware, a state with notoriously lax corporate transparency laws, and the home state of President Biden, a fact that should raise serious questions. This is the opposite of the patriotic move made by Truth Social, which reincorporated from Delaware to Florida, demonstrating a commitment to transparency and American values.
    • The “Global Investor” Myth: We are told that 60% of ByteDance is owned by “global institutional investors.” This is a classic globalist talking point designed to lull us into a false sense of security. It is a distraction. The critical issue is not the 60%, but the controlling interest and influence wielded by the CCP. This “globalist” structure ensures that American interests will always be subjugated.
    • The “Golden Share”: A Dagger at the Heart: The most damning evidence of CCP control lies in the 1% “golden share” held by WangTouZhongWen Technology, an entity backed by the China Internet Investment Fund, in a key ByteDance subsidiary. This is not a trivial stake; it grants the CCP a board seat and direct influence over the company’s operations. This structure is a blatant power grab. No American company would tolerate a foreign adversary holding such a position. It is an insult to our national intelligence to suggest this is anything but direct state control.
    (more…)