Titans of Taste and Tickers: A Comparative Financial Analysis of McDonald’s, Chick-fil-A, Chipotle, and In-N-Out

Executive Summary

This analysis provides a comparative financial and strategic overview of four leading quick-service restaurant (QSR) chains. The companies are McDonald’s, Chick-fil-A, Chipotle, and In-N-Out Burger.

The key findings reveal four distinct models for success. McDonald’s achieves financial dominance through its unparalleled global scale. It leverages a low-risk, high-margin franchise and real estate model.²

In contrast, Chick-fil-A demonstrates industry-leading operational excellence. Its unique operator-centric partnership drives the highest average unit volumes (AUV) in the sector.¹⁰ It achieves this despite being closed on Sundays.

Chipotle’s success is built on total brand control. Its 100% company-owned model allows for rapid innovation and captures all store-level revenue.⁴ However, this model also exposes the company to higher operational costs.

Finally, In-N-Out has prospered by deliberately prioritizing quality control over rapid growth. The company uses a private, vertically integrated, and debt-free structure.¹⁴ This approach cultivates a powerful regional brand with exceptional profitability.

The QSR Financial Hierarchy: A Macro-Level Comparison

Financial performance is the ultimate arbiter of success in the highly competitive QSR industry. Consumer preferences and brand loyalty are critical. Ultimately, a company’s ability to generate sales, revenue, and profit reflects these factors.

This analysis establishes the financial hierarchy among four of the sector’s most prominent players. These include the global behemoth McDonald’s and the domestic juggernaut Chick-fil-A. The list also includes fast-casual pioneer Chipotle and the cult-classic In-N-Out Burger.

Examining their aggregate financial metrics reveals a clear picture of their respective scales. It also shows the fundamental differences in their underlying business architectures.

Defining the Arena: System-Wide Sales

System-wide sales represent the total sales generated by all restaurants under a given brand. This includes both franchised and company-owned locations. This metric provides the most accurate measure of a brand’s overall market share and consumer reach.

• McDonald’s: The company stands in a class of its own as the undisputed global leader. In 2024, its global system-wide sales surpassed an immense $130 billion.¹ This figure comes from more than 41,000 locations worldwide. It establishes the benchmark for global scale and brand penetration in the foodservice industry.²
• Chick-fil-A: Chick-fil-A has established itself as a domestic powerhouse, despite a much smaller store count. The company’s U.S. system-wide sales reached $21.6 billion in 2023. This figure grew to an impressive $22.7 billion in 2024.³ This performance places Chick-fil-A as the third-largest U.S. restaurant chain, trailing only McDonald’s and Starbucks. This is a remarkable achievement given its smaller operational footprint.³
• Chipotle Mexican Grill: Chipotle’s system consists almost entirely of company-owned restaurants. Therefore, its system-wide sales are synonymous with its corporate revenue. For fiscal year 2023, this figure was $9.9 billion. It saw robust growth to $11.3 billion in 2024.⁴
• In-N-Out Burger: In-N-Out is a closely held private company and does not publicly disclose its financial results. However, credible industry analysis from Technomic provides a reliable estimate. For 2023, In-N-Out’s U.S. system sales were estimated at approximately $2.11 billion.⁵ This is the smallest figure among the four competitors. However, it is generated from a highly concentrated base of just over 400 restaurants, pointing to exceptional per-unit performance.⁵

The Corporate Take: A Tale of Two Revenue Models

A critical distinction exists between system-wide sales and corporate revenue in the restaurant industry. For heavily franchised systems, corporate revenue is a fraction of total sales. It consists primarily of royalties, franchise fees, and rental income. For company-owned systems, corporate revenue is the total sales from all restaurants. This divergence reveals the core of each company’s financial strategy.

• McDonald’s: The corporation reported total revenues of $25.49 billion in 2023. This increased slightly to $25.92 billion in 2024.⁶ This means the parent company directly captures approximately 20% of the system’s massive $130 billion in sales as its own revenue. This financial structure confirms McDonald’s operates less as a restaurant company. It functions more as a real estate and brand-licensing entity, collecting a steady stream of high-margin fees from its vast network of independent operators.
• Chick-fil-A: The company’s reported total revenue was $7.89 billion in 2023, growing to $9.06 billion in 2024.³ When compared to its system-wide sales, these figures show that Chick-fil-A’s unique business model allows it to capture a much larger portion of system sales as direct corporate revenue—approximately 40%. This “revenue capture rate” is double that of McDonald’s. It points to a fundamentally different relationship with its franchisees, more akin to a profit-sharing partnership than a traditional licensor-licensee arrangement.
• Chipotle & In-N-Out: For these two companies, the distinction is moot. Their corporate revenue is identical to their system-wide sales due to their 100% company-owned models. This creates a more straightforward financial structure where the parent company is entitled to every dollar of sales. However, it also means the corporation is directly responsible for every dollar of operational cost and risk.

The Bottom Line: Profitability and Net Income

Net income, or the “bottom line,” provides the clearest picture of a company’s profitability. It is calculated after all expenses, taxes, and other costs have been paid. Here again, the structural differences between the companies lead to vastly different outcomes.

• McDonald’s: The franchise-centric model translates into extraordinary profitability. The company posted a net income of $8.47 billion in 2023 and $8.22 billion in 2024.⁷ This represents a net profit margin on its corporate revenue of approximately 32-33%. This profitability level is exceptionally high. It is a direct result of its low-cost, low-risk revenue streams, which are insulated from the operational volatility of running individual restaurants.
• Chipotle: The fast-casual chain reported a net income of $1.23 billion in 2023. This grew to $1.53 billion in 2024.⁴, ⁸ While demonstrating strong growth and healthy profits, its net profit margin on revenue is significantly lower than McDonald’s. It lands in the 12-13.5% range. This lower margin is an inherent feature of its company-owned model. This model requires the corporation to absorb all store-level operating expenses, including food, labor, and occupancy costs.
• Chick-fil-A & In-N-Out: As private entities, neither company discloses its net income. However, credible estimates place In-N-Out’s earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA) margin at a remarkable 20%.⁹ This suggests a level of profitability that, on a percentage basis, likely exceeds Chipotle’s. Its debt-free balance sheet and vertically integrated supply chain drive this performance.

The following table provides a consolidated snapshot of these key financial and operational metrics. It offers an at-a-glance comparison of the four companies.

Table 1: Comparative Financial & Operational Snapshot (FY 2023-2024)

Metric	McDonald’s	Chick-fil-A	Chipotle Mexican Grill	In-N-Out Burger
System-Wide Sales (2023)	~$130 Billion¹	$21.6 Billion³	$9.9 Billion⁴	$2.1 Billion⁵
System-Wide Sales (2024)	>$130 Billion¹	$22.7 Billion³	$11.3 Billion⁴	Private company, data not disclosed
Corporate Revenue (2023)	$25.49 Billion⁶	$7.89 Billion³	$9.9 Billion⁴	$2.1 Billion⁵
Corporate Revenue (2024)	$25.92 Billion⁶	$9.06 Billion³	$11.3 Billion⁴	Private company, data not disclosed
Net Income (2023)	$8.47 Billion⁷	Not Publicly Disclosed	$1.23 Billion⁸	Not Publicly Disclosed
Net Income (2024)	$8.22 Billion⁷	Not Publicly Disclosed	$1.53 Billion⁸	Not Publicly Disclosed
Total Restaurants (Year-End)	>41,800 (2023)²	~3,109 (2024)³	3,726 (2024)⁴	~400 (2023)⁵
Average Unit Volume (AUV, 2023)	~$4.0 Million¹⁰	$9.37 Million¹¹	~$2.9 Million¹²	~$4.5 Million⁹

¹ Based on reported figures exceeding $130 billion for the full year.¹

² Technomic estimate for 2023 U.S. sales, as the company is private.⁵

³ Global figure for year-end 2023.²

⁴ U.S., Canada, and Puerto Rico figure for year-end 2024.³

⁵ Technomic estimate for year-end 2023.⁵ Recent data indicates 424 locations as of mid-2025.³¹

⁶ Based on reports of AUV nearing $4 million.¹⁰

⁷ For non-mall, freestanding, or drive-thru-only locations.¹¹

⁸ Calculated from total 2023 revenue of $9.9 billion divided by 3,434 restaurants open at year-end.¹², ¹³

⁹ Based on widely cited industry estimates.⁹

The Engine of Efficiency: Deconstructing Per-Store Performance

Aggregate sales figures can illuminate the overall scale of an enterprise. However, they can also mask underlying operational strengths and weaknesses.

A more incisive metric for evaluating performance is Average Unit Volume (AUV). AUV measures the average annual sales generated by a single location. This metric strips away the advantage of a large footprint. It reveals the raw productivity and brand power at the individual store level.

In this domain, the hierarchy established by system-wide sales is inverted. This showcases the remarkable efficiency of the smaller, more focused brands.

The Unrivaled Champion: Chick-fil-A’s Staggering AUV

Chick-fil-A’s performance in unit-level economics is extraordinary. In 2023, the company’s non-mall locations generated an average AUV of $9.37 million. The median was $9.28 million.¹¹ This figure is more than double the AUV of a typical McDonald’s restaurant.¹⁰

This dominance is amplified by the fact that Chick-fil-A achieves these results while remaining closed every Sunday. This self-imposed constraint means the brand generates its industry-leading sales in only six days a week.

This “Six-Day vs. Seven-Day” paradox highlights an unmatched level of operational throughput. A simple pro-rata adjustment to estimate a theoretical seven-day AUV would place its performance at over $10.9 million. This suggests that on operating days, Chick-fil-A’s restaurants are so effective that they compress a full week’s demand into a shorter window.

This is a powerful testament to extreme operational excellence and intense customer loyalty. The performance ceiling is also remarkably high. The top-performing Chick-fil-A location generated nearly $19 million in sales in 2023.¹⁰, ¹¹

The Cult Classic: In-N-Out’s Powerful Per-Store Punch

In-N-Out Burger provides another compelling example of elite unit-level performance. Though the company is private, industry estimates place its AUV at a formidable $4.5 million.⁹, ¹⁴ While this figure is older, it still positions In-N-Out far ahead of most national competitors.

This high volume is achieved with a famously simple menu. This points to a business model honed for extreme efficiency and rapid customer throughput. The brand’s cult-like following ensures its limited locations are consistently high-traffic destinations. This allows it to generate sales volumes that many larger chains cannot match.

The Global Giant’s Grind: McDonald’s Solid but Subordinate AUV

McDonald’s does not lead in per-store efficiency, despite its global dominance. In 2023, the AUV for a U.S. McDonald’s restaurant was approaching $4 million.¹⁰ This is a strong figure and represents significant growth. However, it is less than half of Chick-fil-A’s AUV.

This disparity underscores a fundamental truth about McDonald’s financial success. Its success is a product of immense scale, not superior unit-level productivity. The company’s financial might comes from collecting fees from over 41,000 locations. It does not come from maximizing the sales potential of each individual restaurant.²

The Fast-Casual Contender: Chipotle’s Path to Growth

Chipotle’s AUV is solid and growing. Based on its 2023 revenue of $9.9 billion and its 3,434 restaurants, its AUV is approximately $2.9 million.¹², ¹³ This is the lowest among the four companies analyzed, but it is a strong figure for the fast-casual segment.

More importantly, the company has a clear strategic focus on improving this metric. It has a stated long-term ambition to grow its AUVs beyond $4 million.¹³ A key driver of this strategy is the “Chipotlane,” a drive-thru for digital order pickups. These lanes are a feature in most new restaurant openings. They are designed to enhance convenience and increase sales capacity, particularly in suburban markets.¹³

The Blueprint for Profit: Contrasting Business Models

The financial outcomes detailed previously are not accidental. They are the direct result of deliberate, long-term strategic choices. Each company operates under a distinct business model. This model dictates its revenue streams, cost structure, growth philosophy, and relationship with its operators. Understanding these foundational blueprints is essential to comprehending their profound performance differences.

McDonald’s: The Real Estate and Royalty Powerhouse

The McDonald’s model is built on franchising and real estate. Approximately 95% of its more than 41,000 global locations are operated by independent franchisees.² The corporation’s primary business is not selling burgers. Instead, it licenses its powerful brand and acts as a landlord to its operators.

The company’s main revenue streams derive from:

• Royalties (a percentage of sales)
• Initial franchise fees
• Rent collected from franchisees

This structure has profound financial implications. It creates an incredibly stable, predictable, and high-margin cash flow stream for the parent company. The corporation outsources capital costs and operational risks to its franchisees. This insulates it from store-level volatility. This model explains the vast difference between its $130 billion in system sales and its $25 billion in corporate revenue. It also explains its extraordinary ~32% net profit margin.

Chipotle: The Corporate-Owned, Fast-Casual Juggernaut

Chipotle represents the opposite end of the strategic spectrum. The company owns and operates all of its restaurants in North America and Europe.¹⁶ This is a unique approach for a chain of its size. It means every dollar of sales from its 3,726 locations flows directly to the corporate balance sheet.

The primary advantage of this model is total control. Chipotle dictates every aspect of the restaurant experience. This control allows for rapid, centrally-directed strategic initiatives, like the rollout of the Chipotlane concept.

However, this control comes at a significant cost. The corporation is directly responsible for all operating expenses. These include food and beverage costs (29.8% of revenue in 2024), labor, marketing, and rent.⁴ This inherently higher cost structure is the reason for its lower net profit margin compared to McDonald’s.

Chick-fil-A: The Operator-Centric, High-Control Franchise Model

Chick-fil-A has engineered a unique and highly effective hybrid franchise model. It blends elements of both franchising and corporate control. Unlike traditional systems, Chick-fil-A charges a remarkably low franchise fee of just $10,000.¹⁵ The corporation bears the significant capital costs, retaining ownership of the real estate and equipment.

In exchange, Chick-fil-A maintains significant control and takes a much larger share of the restaurant’s financial output. The company charges a high royalty fee (reportedly 15% of sales) and then splits the remaining profit, taking up to 50%. This structure explains the high “revenue capture rate” identified earlier.

The model’s genius lies in its incentive structure. The selection process is intensely competitive because the initial investment is low and operators are typically limited to a single location. This focus on single-unit operational excellence is a primary driver of the chain’s record-breaking AUV and renowned customer service.

In-N-Out: The Private Fortress of Vertical Integration

In-N-Out operates as a 100% private, family-owned, non-franchised entity.¹⁴ This structure informs every aspect of its strategy. The company’s business model is a fortress built on vertical integration, quality control, and a refusal to take on debt. By not franchising, the company retains absolute control over its brand and operations.

This control extends deep into its supply chain.

• In-N-Out butchers its own meat at dedicated facilities.
• It operates its own distribution centers.
• It owns the majority of its restaurant properties.

This vertical integration provides significant cost advantages. Estimates suggest savings of 3-5% on food costs and 6-10% on real estate costs.⁹ These structural advantages are a key reason for its estimated 20% EBITDA margin.⁹ By remaining private and debt-free, In-N-Out is immune to the quarterly pressures of Wall Street. This allows it to prioritize its long-term vision over rapid growth.

The following table summarizes the core components of each company’s business model.

Table 2: Business Model Architecture at a Glance

Component	McDonald’s	Chick-fil-A	Chipotle Mexican Grill	In-N-Out Burger
Ownership Structure	~95% Franchised²	Unique Franchise Model	100% Company-Owned¹⁶	100% Company-Owned (Private)¹⁴
Primary Corp. Revenue	Royalties, Rent, Franchise Fees	Royalties, Profit Sharing	All Restaurant Sales	All Restaurant Sales
Key Cost Drivers	General & Administrative, Marketing	G&A, Marketing, Real Estate Capital	Food, Labor, Rent, Marketing	Food, Labor, Supply Chain, Real Estate
Strategic Priority	Global Scale, Franchisee Profitability	Operator Excellence, Customer Service	Brand Control, Throughput Growth	Quality Control, Brand Preservation

Pathways to Growth: A Strategic Analysis

Each of these four companies is pursuing a distinct strategy for future growth. These strategies reflect their current market saturation, business model constraints, and long-term ambitions. They reveal divergent approaches to capturing future revenue and market share.

McDonald’s: Saturate and Innovate

For a brand with over 41,000 locations globally, the concept of growth is different.² McDonald’s strategy is twofold. First, it will continue to expand its footprint in emerging international markets. Second, it will innovate within its mature, saturated markets like the United States.

The company has an ambitious goal to reach 50,000 total locations by 2027, hinging on international development.¹⁷ In the U.S., which has over 13,500 restaurants, growth is more about driving same-store sales.¹⁸ This is being pursued through the “Digitizing the Arches” strategic plan.¹⁹

Key initiatives include:

• Deploying AI-powered tools like “Accuracy Scales” to ensure order correctness.¹⁹, ²⁰
• Using geofencing for a “Ready on Arrival” system that has cut wait times by over 50%.¹⁹, ²¹
• Introducing menu innovations like McCrispy Strips and bringing back the Snack Wrap in 2025.²²

Chipotle: The North American Conquest

Chipotle’s growth story is still in its middle chapters. The company ended 2024 with 3,726 restaurants.⁴ It has a long-term goal of operating 7,000 locations in North America, nearly doubling its current size.²³, ²²

A key element of this expansion is a strategic push into smaller towns and suburban areas with populations of 40,000 or less.²⁴ The Chipotlane digital drive-thru is the critical enabler of this strategy. It provides the convenience necessary to compete in these car-dependent markets.²⁵ Over 80% of new restaurants in 2025 are planned to include a Chipotlane.²⁵

Chick-fil-A: The International Gambit

Chick-fil-A has achieved a dominant position in the U.S. with over 3,000 locations.²⁶ Now, it is setting its sights on the global stage. The company has embarked on a significant strategic pivot. It has committed $1 billion to an international expansion fund.²⁷

The goal is to establish a presence in five new overseas markets by 2030, focusing on Europe and Asia.²⁸ The first locations in the U.K. and Singapore are slated to open in 2025.²⁹ This expansion presents significant challenges. The brand must adapt its unique, culturally-rooted model to new markets and compete with established global players like KFC.²⁹

In-N-Out: The Deliberate Crawl

In-N-Out’s expansion strategy is the antithesis of its competitors’ aggressive plans. The company’s growth is slow, methodical, and strictly governed by its fresh-never-frozen supply chain. New restaurants are only opened within a day’s drive of its regional distribution facilities.³⁰

With just 424 locations as of mid-2025, its recent entries into states like Idaho and Washington represent major milestones.³¹ This philosophy is a conscious choice to preserve the brand’s “unique” and “sought after” status by rejecting national ubiquity.¹⁴ A new eastern territory office in Tennessee will support growth into nearby states, but states further east are still not being considered.³²

The Broader Competitive Landscape and Industry Trends

These four companies do not operate in a vacuum. They exist within a dynamic and fiercely competitive QSR industry. Several powerful trends shape this landscape. In 2025, the industry is characterized by a renewed focus on value, rapid technological adoption, and evolving consumer preferences.³³

Value is a primary battleground. Major chains are heavily promoting meal deals and digital-exclusive offers in response to economic pressures.³³ This has forced brands to balance affordability with profitability. They use loyalty programs to deliver personalized value.³³

Technology is another key driver of change. The industry is moving toward greater automation and AI integration to improve operational efficiency.³³, ³⁴ Digital convenience remains paramount, with continued investment in drive-thru and pickup-only formats.³⁴

Finally, consumer behavior continues to shift. Customers increasingly prioritize the overall experience, cleanliness, and speed of service.³³ There is also a growing demand for “better for you” ingredients and transparent sourcing.³⁴ These trends create both challenges and opportunities for established and emerging chains.³⁵

Synthesis and Strategic Outlook

The comparison of McDonald’s, Chick-fil-A, Chipotle, and In-N-Out reveals four distinct blueprints for creating value. Their current positions and future trajectories are the logical outcomes of decades of strategic choices.

Recapping the Four Paths to Billions

A synthesis of the analysis presents four clear theses for success:

• McDonald’s achieved dominance through unparalleled global scale, leveraging a low-risk, high-margin model centered on real estate and brand royalties.
• Chick-fil-A wins through a relentless focus on operational and cultural excellence, driving unmatched unit-level efficiency and fostering intense brand loyalty.
• Chipotle built its success on total brand control, capturing 100% of sales and enabling rapid innovation, though it remains exposed to direct operational costs.
• In-N-Out prospered by deliberately rejecting the conventional growth playbook, prioritizing absolute quality control to cultivate a powerful, cult-like regional brand.

Strengths, Vulnerabilities, and Future Trajectories

Looking forward, each company’s greatest strength is intrinsically linked to its primary vulnerability.

• McDonald’s: Its scale is a fortress, but its size can make it slow to adapt. Its future success depends on leveraging technology for a more personalized and efficient experience.
• Chick-fil-A: Its peerless AUV and brand are core assets. Its future growth hinges on successfully exporting its unique business model to international markets.
• Chipotle: Its direct control and domestic growth runway are key advantages. Its primary challenge is preserving its culture and standards while doubling its size and navigating inflation.
• In-N-Out: Its pristine brand and profitability are its crown jewels. Its vulnerability is a self-imposed ceiling on growth, requiring it to maintain its allure while carefully expanding.

Ultimately, this comparison is a master class in the tension between growth and quality. McDonald’s has prioritized scale, while In-N-Out has prioritized quality. Chick-fil-A and Chipotle represent two successful modern attempts to find a sustainable balance. Their continued success will depend on how effectively they manage this fundamental tension.

This analysis reveals no single ‘correct’ formula for market leadership. Instead, success is the product of a consistent strategy aligned with a brand’s core identity. Whether through global franchising, hyper-efficient operations, total corporate control, or disciplined regional focus, each company has built a multi-billion-dollar empire by mastering its chosen path. The key takeaway is that unwavering commitment to a well-defined strategy is the ultimate ingredient for enduring success.

Works Cited

1. McDonald’s Corporation. “2024 Annual Report to Shareholders.” 2025.(https://corporate.mcdonalds.com/content/dam/sites/corp/nfl/pdf/McD%20-%202024%20Annual%20Report%20to%20Shareholders.pdf)
2. McDonald’s Corporation. “Purpose & Impact Progress Report 2023-2024.” 2024.(https://corporate.mcdonalds.com/content/dam/sites/corp/nfl/pdf/McDonalds_PurposeImpact_ProgressReport_2023_2024.pdf)
3. Coley, Danny. “Chick-fil-A’s Sales Surpassed $22 Billion in 2024.” QSR Magazine. 2025. https://www.qsrmagazine.com/story/chick-fil-as-sales-surpassed-22-billion-in-2024/
4. PR Newswire. “Chipotle Announces Fourth Quarter and Full Year 2024 Results.” February 4, 2025. https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/chipotle-announces-fourth-quarter-and-full-year-2024-results-302368039.html
5. Technomic. “Top 500 Chains 2024: In-N-Out Burger.” Restaurant Business Online. 2024. https://restaurantbusinessonline.com/top-500-chains-2024/n-out-burger
6. Macrotrends. “McDonald’s Revenue 2010-2025 | MCD.” 2025.(https://www.macrotrends.net/stocks/charts/MCD/mcdonalds/revenue)
7. Macrotrends. “McDonald’s Net Income 2010-2025 | MCD.” 2025.(https://www.macrotrends.net/stocks/charts/MCD/mcdonalds/net-income)
8. Macrotrends. “Chipotle Mexican Grill Net Income 2010-2025 | CMG.” 2025. https://www.macrotrends.net/stocks/charts/CMG/chipotle-mexican-grill/net-income
9. Franquicias Magazine. “The Secret Sauce Behind In-N-Out Burger’s Exceptional Profitability.” May 9, 2025. https://franquiciasmagazine.com/2025/05/11/the-secret-sauce-behind-in-n-out-burgers-exceptional-profitability/
10. Maze, Jonathan. “Chick-fil-A’s unit volumes at stand-alone restaurants hit $9M last year.” Restaurant Business Online. April 4, 2024. https://www.restaurantbusinessonline.com/financing/chick-fil-unit-volumes-stand-alone-restaurants-hit-9m-last-year
11. Coley, Danny. “Chick-fil-A Made Over $21 Billion in 2023.” QSR Magazine. April 4, 2024. https://www.qsrmagazine.com/growth/finance/chick-fil-a-made-over-21-billion-in-2023/
12. Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. “Chipotle Announces Fourth Quarter and Full Year 2023 Results.” February 6, 2024.(https://ir.chipotle.com/2024-02-06-CHIPOTLE-ANNOUNCES-FOURTH-QUARTER-AND-FULL-YEAR-2023-RESULTS)
13. Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. “Chipotle Announces Fourth Quarter and Full Year 2024 Results.” February 4, 2025.(https://ir.chipotle.com/2025-02-04-CHIPOTLE-ANNOUNCES-FOURTH-QUARTER-AND-FULL-YEAR-2024-RESULTS)
14. Sorvino, Chloe. “Exclusive: In-N-Out Billionaire Lynsi Snyder Opens Up About Her Troubled Past And The Burger Chain’s Future.” Forbes. October 10, 2018. https://www.forbes.com/sites/chloesorvino/2018/10/10/exclusive-in-n-out-billionaire-lynsi-snyder-opens-up-about-her-troubled-past-and-the-burger-chains-future/
15. Vetted Biz. “Chick-fil-A Franchise Cost, Fees, and Profit.” 2025. https://www.vettedbiz.com/chick-fil-a-franchise-cost/
16. Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. “About Chipotle.” 2025.(https://ir.chipotle.com/2025-02-04-CHIPOTLE-ANNOUNCES-FOURTH-QUARTER-AND-FULL-YEAR-2024-RESULTS)
17. McDonald’s Corporation. “Accelerating the Arches Strategic Plan 2024.” 2024.(https://corporate.mcdonalds.com/content/dam/sites/corp/nfl/pdf/Accelerating-the-Arches-Strategic-Plan-2024.pdf)
18. Wikipedia. “List of countries with McDonald’s restaurants.” 2025.(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_with_McDonald%27s_restaurants)
19. McDonald’s Corporation. “Digitizing the Arches.” 2025. https://corporate.mcdonalds.com/corpmcd/our-stories/article/digitizing-the-arches.html
20. DigitalDefynd. “8 Ways McDonald’s Is Using AI.” 2025. https://digitaldefynd.com/IQ/mcdonalds-using-ai-case-study/
21. Food & Drink International. “McDonald’s accelerates technology integration to enhance operations and customer engagement.” 2025. https://www.fdiforum.net/mag/featured/mcdonalds-accelerates-technology-integration-to-enhance-operations-and-customer-engagement/
22. QSR Magazine. “The 2025 QSR 50: Fast Food’s Leading Annual Report.” 2025. https://www.qsrmagazine.com/story/the-2025-qsr-50-fast-foods-leading-annual-report/
23. Wikipedia. “Chipotle Mexican Grill.” 2025. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chipotle_Mexican_Grill
24. Carmicheal, Kayla. “Chipotle To Begin Loading Up Burrito Bowls In 800 Small-Town Locations.” Bisnow. July 18, 2023. https://www.bisnow.com/national/news/retail/chipotle-to-begin-loading-up-burrito-bowls-in-800-small-town-locations-119856
25. Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. “Chipotle Announces Second Quarter 2025 Results.” July 23, 2025.(https://newsroom.chipotle.com/2025-07-23-CHIPOTLE-ANNOUNCES-SECOND-QUARTER-2025-RESULTS)
26. Chick-fil-A, Inc. “Announcing the 2023 Global Impact Report.” 2024. https://www.chick-fil-a.com/press-room/announcing-2023-global-impact-report
27. Global Atlanta. “Chick-fil-A Picks First Asia Location as International Expansion Continues.” 2024. https://www.globalatlanta.com/chick-fil-a-picks-first-asia-location-as-international-expansion-continues/
28. Chick-fil-A, Inc. “Is Chick-fil-A international?” 2025. https://www.chick-fil-a.com/customer-support/who-we-are/our-restaurants/is-chick-fil-a-international
29. Maze, Jonathan. “Chick-fil-A is now taking on Singapore.” Restaurant Business Online. October 17, 2024. https://www.restaurantbusinessonline.com/financing/chick-fil-now-taking-singapore
30. In-N-Out Burger. “Media Kit.” 2025. https://www.in-n-out.com/mediakit/
31. Wikipedia. “In-N-Out Burger.” 2025.(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/In-N-Out_Burger)
32. Maze, Jonathan. “Why In-N-Out is moving out of California.” Restaurant Business Online. July 21, 2025. https://www.restaurantbusinessonline.com/operations/why-n-out-moving-out-california
33. Rezku. “Quick Service Restaurant (QSR) Industry: Market Size, Stats & Trends Report 2025.” 2025. https://rezku.com/blog/qsr-industry/
34. Chowbus. “Quick Service Restaurant Trends.” 2025. https://www.chowbus.com/blog/quick-service-restaurant-trends
35. Aaron Allen & Associates. “Emerging Restaurant Chains Are Vacuuming Traffic From Established Chains.” June 3, 2024. https://aaronallen.com/blog/emerging-restaurant-chains