Doomscroll News

Category: Government

  • Convergence and Collision: Analyzing the Strategic Rivalry Between Salesforce and Palantir in the New GovTech Era

    Executive Summary

    The multi-trillion-dollar government technology (GovTech) sector is now the central battleground for a high-stakes war. The conflict is between two of Silicon Valley’s most powerful and ideologically opposed titans: Salesforce and Palantir Technologies. This report dissects their strategic collision.

    The rivalry is defined by Salesforce’s aggressive, cost-driven invasion of the national security domain. This market has long been dominated by Palantir’s bespoke, premium-priced data intelligence platforms. This rivalry is not merely a corporate skirmish. It is a conflict that will redefine the future of federal procurement, national security, and the application of artificial intelligence in government.

    Key flashpoints in 2025 have irrevocably altered the competitive landscape. Salesforce landed a decisive blow by securing a ~$100 million U.S. Army contract, winning primarily on its significantly lower price point.¹ The company immediately followed this win by launching Missionforce, a dedicated national security division.²

    Palantir, in turn, was rocked by a “Crisis of Confidence.” A leaked U.S. Army memo exposed “very high risk” security vulnerabilities in a next-generation battlefield prototype.³ This revelation struck at the core of its trusted reputation.

    The conflict has also escalated into a political chess match. Salesforce CEO Marc Benioff made a shocking endorsement of the Trump administration.⁴ This was a calculated maneuver designed to neutralize the formidable political influence of Palantir’s co-founder, Peter Thiel.⁵

    This analysis concludes that the GovTech market has reached a critical inflection point. Palantir must now defend its technological and political moats against a challenger with the scale to commoditize the market. Salesforce, meanwhile, faces the immense challenge of proving its commercial-first platform is secure and capable enough for the nation’s most sensitive missions. The outcome of this clash will determine not just market supremacy, but the very architecture of America’s future digital defense infrastructure.

    (more…)
  • An Analysis of Federal Debarment: The Top 10 Most Likely Causes for Exclusion from Defense Contracting

    An Analysis of Federal Debarment: The Top 10 Most Likely Causes for Exclusion from Defense Contracting

    Executive Summary

    This report analyzes the legal grounds for debarment from U.S. government contracting. It uses a hypothetical 2007 scenario involving John Sonday of Accurate Energetic Systems (AES) as a framework to explore a broader question: What actions lead to exclusion from federal work?¹

    While public records do not support the specific allegation, the case provides a practical lens through which to examine the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR). The analysis explains debarment as a risk management tool. It details the primary causes for exclusion, from fraud and bribery to poor performance.

    The report culminates in a ranked list of the top ten most likely causes for debarment. It also examines the principle of personal culpability for corporate misconduct. This document serves as a guide for defense industry professionals on the critical importance of proactive compliance and ethical conduct.

    (more…)
  • A System of Failure, A Record of Loss: Analyzing the Integrity Flaws of the EPLS (2006-2008) and the Lawful Erasure of Its Data

    A System of Failure, A Record of Loss: Analyzing the Integrity Flaws of the EPLS (2006-2008) and the Lawful Erasure of Its Data

    Executive Summary

    This report argues that the U.S. government’s Excluded Parties List System (EPLS) was fundamentally compromised during the 2006-2008 period. The system, designed to prevent procurement fraud, was crippled by a cascade of failures. These failures involved data integrity, system functionality, and widespread agency non-compliance.

    This breakdown allowed contractors to improperly receive millions in federal funds. Many of these parties were debarred for serious offenses, including national security violations.³

    Compounding this operational failure, the legal framework governing federal records mandated the lawful destruction of the EPLS data.⁴, ⁵ This compliant erasure of primary-source evidence has created a permanent and irreversible “accountability gap.” It prevents a full forensic understanding of this government malfunction. The situation underscores an urgent need for policy reform in system design and data retention for critical government oversight systems.

    (more…)

  • The AI Auditor: Can Machine Learning Finally End the Era of Wasteful Government Healthcare Spending?

    The Black Hole of Healthcare Spending

    There are staggering statistics about the current US national debt and the percentage attributed to healthcare programs like Medicare and Medicaid.

    There are well-documented problems of fraud, waste, and abuse: upcoding, phantom billing, medically unnecessary procedures …

    Traditional human-led audits are slow, expensive, and only catch a tiny fraction of the problem, creating a massive accountability gap.

    Enter the AI Auditor, A New Paradigm for Transparency

    Using advanced AI and machine learning models to analyze massive healthcare claims datasets in real-time.

    AI can identify complex patterns of fraud that are invisible to human auditors: collusive networks of providers, subtle anomalies across millions of claims …

    The current model is “pay and chase” … what about a future of “pre-payment verification” where AI flags suspicious claims before a single taxpayer dollar is spent?

    (more…)
  • The Automated Watchdog: Promise and Peril of AI in Government Auditing

    The Automated Watchdog: Promise and Peril of AI in Government Auditing

    1. The Potential Benefits of AI Auditors

    • Massive Data Processing: AI can analyze entire government spending databases (e.g., USASpending.gov) in minutes, a task that is physically impossible for human teams.
    • Real-Time Anomaly Detection: Unlike traditional audits that are often retrospective, AI can flag suspicious transactions, contracts, or grant awards as they happen, enabling proactive intervention.
    • Enhanced Pattern Recognition: AI excels at identifying complex, subtle patterns of waste or fraud across multiple agencies and years that would be invisible to human auditors.
    • Potential for Non-Partisan Oversight: When properly designed and constrained, AI systems can apply auditing rules consistently, reducing the potential for human bias or political influence in routine checks.

    2. Inherent Risks and Systemic Blind Spots

    The risks extend beyond simple technical errors and encompass systemic vulnerabilities that could undermine the entire oversight framework.

    (more…)
  • Information Blockade: A Flawed System, Tainted Actors, and the COVID-19 Response

    Information Blockade: A Flawed System, Tainted Actors, and the COVID-19 Response

    A defective system governing taxpayer-funded research, coupled with questionable corporate actors, hampered the nation’s ability to respond to the COVID-19 crisis. This information blockade had dire consequences, not only for public health but also for the very companies that were supposed to be at the forefront of innovation.

    The problem stems from a long-standing policy that has prioritized corporate profits over public access to critical information. In 2013, the Obama administration’s White House Office of Science and Technology Policy (OSTP), then led by Director John P. Holdren, issued a memorandum entitled “Increasing Access to the Results of Federally Funded Scientific Research.” This memo established a 12-month embargo period, allowing publishers to lock away taxpayer-funded research for a full year.This delay, a significant impediment in a rapidly evolving public health crisis, was a compromise to appease the highly profitable academic publishing industry.

    This dysfunctional system created a breeding ground for opportunism and mismanagement.

    • Delayed Access, Stalled Innovation: The 12-month embargo meant that crucial data on clinical trials, epidemiological models, and virology was often obsolete by the time it became freely available. This left not only the American public in the dark, but also the very companies developing diagnostic tools. The Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) process, which should have provided a swift path to public data, was also rendered ineffective, with requests for vital information stalled for years, well beyond the supposed two-week turnaround for a clear and present danger.
    • Corporate Casualties and Questionable Practices: The story of Lucira Health exemplifies the devastating consequences of this information bottleneck. The company, which developed a promising combined COVID-19 and flu test, was financed by Silicon Valley Bank (SVB) and Hercules Capital, securing a debt facility of up to $80 million. However, Lucira was forced to file for Chapter 11 bankruptcy after a slower-than-anticipated FDA Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) process for its new test created a fatal cash crunch. Pfizer then acquired the company’s assets for a mere $36.4 million. The collapse of SVB, which held deposits for numerous Chinese companies, has also raised concerns. Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen confirmed that uninsured depositors in SVB, including those with ties to the Chinese Communist Party, would be made whole by the American banking system. This has led to questions about potential conflicts of interest, especially given the belief that the COVID-19 virus originated in a lab in Wuhan, China.
    • A System Admitting Failure: In a tacit admission of the system’s shortcomings, the White House OSTP issued a new memo in August 2022, mandating that all taxpayer-funded research be made freely and immediately available by the end of 2025, effectively ending the 12-month embargo. While a welcome change, this comes as cold comfort for the companies and the public who were failed by a system that prioritized profits and secrecy over transparency and innovation during a critical time of need.

  • The “Big Beautiful” Bonus for Our Border Agents: A $5.25 Billion State Accountability Plan

    A new proposal outlines a plan to deliver a $50,000 bonus to every agent, soldier, and officer on the front lines of the border crisis, paid out over three years. By holding specific states financially accountable, the plan aims to create a powerful incentive for cooperation in federal immigration enforcement and ensure reimbursement for the costs incurred by the nation as a whole.

    The total cost, estimated at $5.25 billion, would be funded entirely by the ten states with the largest populations of unauthorized immigrants: California, Texas, Florida, New York, New Jersey, Illinois, North Carolina, Georgia, Washington, and Arizona. The other 40 states would be explicitly exempt from this financial obligation.

    This plan recognizes the immense contributions of approximately 105,000 individuals across the key agencies that have shouldered the burden of the crisis.

    (more…)