The Two Tracks of Diplomacy: Why Ambassador Huckabee was Sidelined in the 2025 Gaza Negotiations

I. Introduction: The Paradox of the Sidelined Ambassador

A striking paradox emerged at the heart of American diplomacy in October 2025. A fragile ceasefire and hostage-release deal was brokered between Israel and Hamas. The on-the-ground negotiations in Egypt, however, were not led by Mike Huckabee, the sitting U.S. Ambassador to Israel.

Instead, a parallel team of presidential envoys, Steve Witkoff and Jared Kushner, took the lead. President Donald Trump publicly praised Ambassador Huckabee for his “amazing” contributions, but others clearly played the central role.

This raises a critical question. Why was the President’s highest-ranking resident representative functionally sidelined during the most significant diplomatic crisis in his jurisdiction?

The Core Argument: A Two-Track System

This report argues that Ambassador Huckabee’s supportive role was a deliberate outcome. It was the logical result of the Trump administration’s bifurcated diplomatic system. This system operates on two parallel tracks:

The Formal Track: This institutional track is managed by traditional figures like ambassadors. Their goal is to maintain stable, day-to-day relations.
The Informal Track: This personal track is reserved for high-stakes, transactional “deal-making.” It is executed by personally trusted envoys whose power flows directly from the President.¹

The acute crisis in Gaza was assigned to this second track by its very nature. This rendered the Ambassador’s role constitutionally important but functionally secondary to the President’s personal emissaries.

Structure of the Analysis

This analysis will deconstruct the diplomatic hierarchy in four parts:

Foundational Roles: It will first establish the distinctions between a U.S. Ambassador and a Presidential Special Envoy.
Administrative Context: It will then contextualize these roles within the Trump administration’s unique foreign policy doctrine. This doctrine prioritizes personal loyalty and transactional negotiation over institutional protocol.
Key Actors: Third, it will profile the key actors—Huckabee, Kushner, and Witkoff—to analyze their distinct sources of power.
Synthesis: Finally, the report will synthesize these elements. It will provide a comprehensive explanation for the division of labor that placed the special envoys at the forefront of the 2025 Gaza negotiations.

II. The Diplomatic Architecture: Formal Roles vs. Functional Realities

To understand the personnel choices in the Gaza negotiations, one must first understand the formal architecture of American diplomacy. The U.S. government uses distinct diplomatic instruments for different purposes. The Ambassador and the Special Envoy represent two different models of engagement. The decision to elevate one over the other in a crisis reveals an administration’s core approach to statecraft.

A. The Ambassador: The President’s Resident Representative

The position of an Ambassador is the bedrock of traditional, institutionalized diplomacy. Their authority is formally established and embedded in the U.S. government’s structure.

Constitutional and Statutory Authority

An ambassador is a formal, constitutionally-vetted officer of the state.² The President nominates them, and the Senate confirms the appointment, as stipulated in Article II, Section 2 of the U.S. Constitution. This process gives the ambassador the full weight of institutional legitimacy. While they serve “at the pleasure of the President,” their appointment is a matter of public record and congressional oversight.²

Broad and Continuous Mandate

An ambassador’s mandate is exceptionally broad and continuous. As chief of mission, they coordinate all U.S. government activities in the host country, which can include representatives from as many as 27 federal departments.³ Their duties are multifaceted and focus on cultivating the long-term health of the bilateral relationship.⁴ ⁵ These responsibilities include:

Maintaining diplomatic and economic ties.
Crafting international policies.
Protecting American citizens abroad.
Administering the entire embassy apparatus.⁴ ⁶

B. The Special Envoy: The President’s Personal Troubleshooter

The role of a Special Envoy is fundamentally different. It is designed for agility, focus, and direct presidential intervention.

Direct Presidential Authority

A special envoy is an agent appointed as the personal representative of the President or Secretary of State.⁷ Their authority flows directly from the executive who appointed them, not from a Senate-confirmed office. Presidents have long dispatched such emissaries on limited missions without seeking Senate confirmation, viewing them as extensions of their own executive power.⁸

Narrow and Temporary Mandate

A special envoy has a temporary, ad-hoc mandate focused on a specific problem or negotiation.⁹ ¹⁰ Their purpose is not to manage an entire relationship but to resolve a specific conflict.

A Classic Example: Former Senator George Mitchell was appointed U.S. Special Envoy for Northern Ireland. In this role, he played a leading part in mediating the Good Friday Agreement, a singular and historic peace accord.¹¹ ¹²

Other envoys have been tasked with specific issues like climate change or hostage affairs, illustrating the issue-specific nature of the position.⁷ ¹³

Operational Flexibility

Special envoys are explicitly designed to “operate outside of the typical reach of an ambassador”.⁷ This freedom allows them to transcend bureaucratic constraints and engage in high-stakes shuttle diplomacy without the administrative burdens of managing an embassy.¹⁴ ¹⁵ They are, in effect, diplomatic “strike teams.”¹

The Trump administration’s consistent preference for the envoy model in major crises signals a foundational belief that its methods are superior to the institutional approach of traditional diplomacy.

III. The Trump Doctrine: Relationship-Based Diplomacy

To understand why Witkoff and Kushner led the Gaza negotiations, one must examine the Trump administration’s specific operational code. This “Trump Doctrine” departs from traditional American statecraft. It is a system where personal relationships supersede institutional hierarchy, and transactional “deal-making” is the ultimate form of diplomacy.

A. Loyalty and Proximity as the Ultimate Currency

In conventional government, power correlates with formal hierarchy. In the Trump administration, influence is determined more by personal loyalty and direct access to the President.

This principle is clear in the dynamic between Special Envoy Steve Witkoff and Secretary of State Marco Rubio. Secretary Rubio technically outranks Witkoff. However, foreign capitals quickly understood the reality in President Trump’s world: “power flows through personal connection to the president”.¹⁶

Witkoff’s nearly 40-year friendship with Trump gives him a level of clout that a former political rival like Rubio could not match.¹⁶ This reflects an organizing principle where “loyalty, not hierarchy,” dictates the flow of power.¹ Key figures like Kushner and Witkoff operate as a “tight, agile network, one part family office, one part diplomatic strike team,” bypassing formal channels to deal directly with power brokers.¹

B. From Real Estate to Realpolitik: The “Deal-Maker” Model

The Trump Doctrine is also defined by its preference for the “deal-maker,” typically drawn from business and real estate.¹⁷ This choice reflects a core belief that international conflicts are analogous to complex business transactions. The administration believes they are solvable through leverage, persuasion, and pragmatic, interest-based agreements.¹ This approach prioritizes economic incentives over abstract issues like international law and historical grievances.¹⁶

Jared Kushner’s role as the architect of the Abraham Accords validated this model.¹⁸ ¹⁹ ²⁰ By successfully brokering normalization agreements, Kushner cemented the “deal-maker” as the administration’s preferred archetype for Middle East peace initiatives.¹ ²⁰

The practical application of this doctrine is stark. A traditional ambassador might spend weeks coordinating with the State Department. In contrast, an envoy like Witkoff can fly to Israel on short notice, demand a meeting that interrupts the Prime Minister’s Sabbath, and directly convey the President’s terms, as he reportedly did in January 2025.¹⁶

This approach, however, has significant long-term drawbacks:

Institutional Decay: By consistently circumventing the State Department, it risks demoralizing and hollowing out the nation’s institutional diplomatic capacity, relegating career professionals to secondary roles.²¹ ²² ²³
Policy Instability: The model is built on personal relationships. Therefore, it cannot be easily replicated. This leads to a foreign policy characterized by radical discontinuity between administrations and high unpredictability for allies and adversaries.²¹ ²² ²⁹

Critics argue this represents a “corporate-imperial” logic that attempts to commodify sovereignty and erase critical historical context.²⁴

IV. The Principals of the Gaza Accords: A Profile in Power

The division of labor in the Gaza negotiations becomes clear through a comparative analysis of the three key American figures. Ambassador Huckabee, Jared Kushner, and Special Envoy Steve Witkoff were not a traditional delegation. They represented a purpose-built portfolio of actors, each chosen for a different element of power as defined by the Trump administration.

A. Ambassador Mike Huckabee: The Institutional Manager

Ambassador Huckabee’s role was that of the competent, on-the-ground manager of the formal U.S.-Israel relationship. His documented activities are all characteristic of an ambassador’s core functions:⁴ ⁵

Issuing public statements.
Criticizing European recognition of a Palestinian state.
Visiting sensitive sites like Kfar Aza.
Defending U.S. aid initiatives.

His primary function was to maintain the stability of the formal bilateral relationship. This provided a stable platform for the President’s special emissaries to conduct their mission. In this system, his role as the institutional anchor was a vital, supportive function within the synergistic portfolio.

B. Jared Kushner: The Architect of Regional Continuity

Jared Kushner’s power derived from two sources. The first was his unique familial proximity to the President. The second was his proven track record as the architect of the Abraham Accords.¹⁸ ¹⁹ ²⁰

This prior success gave him immense credibility with the administration and key regional partners.¹ His presence served as a powerful symbol of continuity, linking the Gaza ceasefire to the administration’s broader strategic vision. He was the strategic visionary of the effort, leveraging his deep contacts to shape the deal’s overarching framework.¹ ¹⁹ His contribution of strategic vision formed the second pillar of the synergistic portfolio.

C. Special Envoy Steve Witkoff: The President’s Alter Ego

If Kushner was the architect, Special Envoy Steve Witkoff was the tactical “closer.” His power flowed from a single, overwhelming source: his nearly 40-year personal friendship with President Trump.¹⁶ ²⁵

Described as a “true and dear friend,” Witkoff functions as the President’s alter ego at the negotiating table.¹⁶ ²⁶ ²⁷ His role was to be the direct, unfiltered instrument of the President’s will. He applied maximum pressure to achieve the desired result. This was perfectly encapsulated in the January 2025 talks. He directly conveyed the President’s demand for a deal to Prime Minister Netanyahu, stating, “The president has been a great friend of Israel… and now it’s time to be a friend back.” This move reportedly secured an immediate agreement.¹⁶ His role as the embodiment of unfiltered presidential will provided the final, decisive element of the synergistic portfolio.

V. Synthesis and Analysis: Deconstructing the Diplomatic Hierarchy

The preceding analysis provides the components to deconstruct the hierarchy of the 2025 Gaza negotiations. Integrating these elements reveals a clear conclusion. The sidelining of Ambassador Huckabee was not an incidental outcome. It was a structural necessity of the Trump administration’s foreign policy model.

A. The Mandate Mismatch: Management vs. Mediation

The primary reason for the division of labor was a functional mismatch. The ambassador’s mandate did not fit the specific requirements of the crisis negotiation. The role of an ambassador is broad, continuous, and administrative.⁵ ⁶ Ambassador Huckabee’s responsibilities included overseeing the entire embassy and managing U.S. interests across a wide spectrum of issues.

In stark contrast, the Gaza negotiation required a narrow, short-term, and singularly focused effort. This is the precise definition of a special envoy’s mission.⁹ ¹⁰ The administration engaged in a form of diplomatic triage. It assigned the right tool for the job as it defined it. The long-term management of the U.S.-Israel alliance remained the Ambassador’s portfolio. The acute, high-stakes crisis mediation was assigned to the specialized instrument of the special envoy.

B. Structural Power vs. Personal Authority

The core conclusion of this analysis is simple. Within the Trump diplomatic ecosystem, personal authority is a more potent currency than structural power. This personal authority is derived directly from the President’s trust.

Ambassador Huckabee, as a Senate-confirmed appointee, wielded significant structural power inherent in his position.² However, Steve Witkoff and Jared Kushner wielded a different, more decisive form of power: the personal authority granted by their unique, intimate relationships with the President.

In a negotiation where President Trump’s personal commitment was the key variable, the envoys who directly embodied that commitment were the necessary leaders. Foreign leaders understood that while the Ambassador represented the U.S. government, Witkoff represented the unfiltered intentions of Donald Trump himself.¹⁶ When Witkoff spoke, it was as if the President were in the room.

Feature	U.S. Ambassador (Huckabee)	Presidential Special Envoy (Witkoff)
Source of Authority	U.S. Constitution (Art. II, Sec. 2), Senate Confirmation²	Direct Presidential Appointment⁷
Mandate	Broad, continuous, country-specific³ ⁶	Narrow, temporary, issue-specific⁹
Primary Function	Manage bilateral relations, embassy operations, citizen services⁴ ⁶	Mediate specific conflict, execute high-stakes negotiation¹¹ ¹⁴
Reporting Line	Formally to Secretary of State; serves “at the pleasure of the President”²	Directly to the President¹ ¹⁶ ²⁸
Key Asset	Formal diplomatic rank, institutional position, embassy resources	Proximity and personal trust of the President¹⁶
Operational Mode	Within established diplomatic and bureaucratic channels³	Outside of, or parallel to, traditional channels⁷

Ultimately, the term “sidelined” is misleading. It is a product of a traditional, hierarchical view of diplomacy that the Trump administration has actively rejected. The evidence shows the administration operates on a parallel, network-based system. In this context, Huckabee was not sidelined, but “right-sized.” His role was correctly calibrated to his vital function within that specific system.

VI. Conclusion: Implications for U.S. Foreign Policy

The analysis reveals that Ambassador Mike Huckabee’s supportive role was a feature, not a bug, of the Trump administration’s foreign policy. His position was structurally unsuited for the demands of a crisis negotiation. The administration, by doctrine and precedent, reserved such tasks for its trusted, non-traditional “deal-makers.”

This case study holds significant implications for U.S. foreign policy:

Increased Volatility: This model, while capable of producing rapid results, introduces a high degree of volatility into American statecraft. It is contingent on personal relationships, not durable institutions, making it inherently unstable between administrations.²¹ ²² ²⁹
Institutional Degradation: The consistent circumvention of the State Department risks a long-term degradation of America’s diplomatic capacity.³⁰ ³¹ ³² It relegates career diplomats to secondary roles.
Challenges for Allies: This poses a significant challenge to allies and partners. They must learn to navigate not only formal structures but also the informal, personal networks of power surrounding the President.

In conclusion, the question of why Ambassador Huckabee was sidelined transcends the individuals involved. It serves as a definitive case study in a personalized approach to American foreign policy that challenges long-standing norms. The tension between this disruptive, personality-driven statecraft and traditional, institution-based diplomacy will remain a central challenge for U.S. foreign policy for years to come.

Works Cited

The Arab Weekly. “Jared Kushner’s Second Act.” The Arab Weekly. https://thearabweekly.com/jared-kushners-second-act
Wikipedia. “Ambassadors of the United States.” Wikipedia. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ambassadors_of_the_United_States
U.S. Department of State, Bureau of Public Affairs. “What Are the Roles of a Diplomat?” diplomacy.state.gov. https://diplomacy.state.gov/what-are-the-roles-of-a-diplomat/
Cornell Law School Legal Information Institute. “Ambassador.” Wex. https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/ambassador
Bay Atlantic University. “How to Become a U.S. Ambassador.” bau.edu. https://bau.edu/blog/how-to-become-a-u-s-ambassador/
Cornell Law School Legal Information Institute. “Ambassador.” Wex. https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/ambassador#:~:text=Among%20other%20responsibilities%2C%20ambassadors%20ensure,the%20affairs%20of%20the%20embassy.
Ballotpedia. “Special envoys by administration.” Ballotpedia. https://ballotpedia.org/Special_envoys_by_administration
Constitution Annotated, Congress.gov. “ArtII.S2.C2.3.4 Ambassadors, Ministers, and Consuls.” constitution.congress.gov. https://constitution.congress.gov/browse/essay/artII-S2-C2-3-4/ALDE_00013095/
Max Planck Institute for Comparative Public Law and International Law. “Special Envoy.” Oxford Public International Law. October 2025. https://opil.ouplaw.com/display/10.1093/law:epil/9780199231690/law-9780199231690-e2054
Max Planck Institute for Comparative Public Law and International Law. “Special Envoy.” Oxford Public International Law. https://opil.ouplaw.com/abstract/10.1093/law:epil/9780199231690/law-9780199231690-e2054
ShareAmerica. “U.S.-brokered peace deals across the years.” share.america.gov. June 14, 2018. https://archive-share.america.gov/u-s-brokered-peace-deals-across-the-years/index.html
Wikipedia. “United States Special Envoy for Northern Ireland.” Wikipedia. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Special_Envoy_for_Northern_Ireland
U.S. Department of State. “About Us – Special Presidential Envoy for Hostage Affairs.” state.gov. https://www.state.gov/about-us-special-presidential-envoy-for-hostage-affairs
Lyman, Princeton N. and Robert M. Beecroft. “Using Special Envoys In High-Stakes Conflict Diplomacy.” United States Institute of Peace. https://www.usip.org/sites/default/files/SR353-USING-SPECIAL-ENVOYS-IN-HIGH-STAKES-CONFLICT-DIPLOMACY.pdf
United States Institute of Peace. “Five Ways to Set Up a Special Envoy for Success in the Horn of Africa.” usip.org. February 11, 2021. https://www.usip.org/publications/2021/02/five-ways-set-special-envoy-success-horn-africa
Beaumont, Peter. “Steve Witkoff: from property developer to global spotlight as Trump’s tough-talking troubleshooter.” The Guardian. February 22, 2025. https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/feb/22/steve-witkoff-trump-gaza-ukraine-envoy
Wikipedia. “Steve Witkoff.” Wikipedia. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steve_Witkoff
Wikipedia. “Jared Kushner.” Wikipedia. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jared_Kushner#:~:text=Kushner%20was%20the%20primary%20Trump,various%20Arab%20states%20in%202020.
Lightstone, Aryeh. “Behind the Curtain at the Creation of the Abraham Accords.” Jewish News Syndicate. July 2022. https://jstribune.com/lightstone-behind-the-curtain-of-the-abraham-accords/
Jewish News Syndicate. “Heritage Foundation acquires Kushner-founded Abraham Accords Peace Institute.” jns.org. https://www.jns.org/heritage-foundation-acquires-kushner-founded-abraham-accords-peace-institute/
Scherer, Thomas and Dan Spokojny. “The Marginalization of Career Diplomats.” The Foreign Service Journal. November 2024. https://afsa.org/marginalization-career-diplomats
fp21. “Why We Should Care About Politically Appointed Diplomats.” fp21.org. https://www.fp21.org/publications/why-we-should-care-about-politically-appointed-diplomats
Council on Foreign Relations. “State of the State Department: A Progress Report on Diplomatic Readiness.” cfr.org. https://cdn.cfr.org/sites/default/files/report_pdf/csr89_final.pdf
Middle East Monitor. “Kushner’s Mirage: The ‘Gaza Riviera’ and the Theft of a Homeland.” middleeastmonitor.com. October 5, 2025. https://www.middleeastmonitor.com/20251005-kushners-mirage-the-gaza-riviera-and-the-theft-of-a-homeland/
Beaumont, Peter. “Steve Witkoff: from property developer to global spotlight as Trump’s tough-talking troubleshooter.” The Guardian. February 22, 2025. https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/feb/22/steve-witkoff-trump-gaza-ukraine-envoy
NPR / The Public’s Radio. “Who is Steve Witkoff? Trump’s Middle East envoy is a real estate mogul and old friend.” thepublicsradio.org. https://thepublicsradio.org/npr/who-is-steve-witkoff-trumps-middle-east-envoy-is-a-real-estate-mogul-and-old-friend/
The Indian Express. “The dealmaker’s dealmaker: Who is Steve Witkoff, Donald Trump’s special envoy to the Middle East.” indianexpress.com. https://indianexpress.com/article/explained/explained-global/dealmakers-dealmaker-steve-witkoff-trump-10294721/
U.S. Department of State. “About Us – Office of the Special Presidential Envoy for Hostage Affairs.” state.gov. https://www.state.gov/about-us-special-presidential-envoy-for-hostage-affairs#:~:text=The%20Special%20Presidential%20Envoy%20for%20Hostage%20Affairs%20(SPEHA)%20is%20appointed,taking%20and%20wrongful%20detention%20abroad.
U.S. Senate Committee on Foreign Relations. “The Trump Administration’s Foreign Policy: A Report.” govinfo.gov. https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/CPRT-116SPRT44275/html/CPRT-116SPRT44275.htm
The Atlantic. “Why Keep State Department Special Envoys?” theatlantic.com. https://americandiplomacy.web.unc.edu/2017/10/why-keep-state-department-special-envoys/
Brookings Institution. “How to Revitalize a Dysfunctional State Department.” brookings.edu. https://www.brookings.edu/articles/how-to-revitalize-a-dysfunctional-state-department/
U.S. Senate Committee on Foreign Relations. “The Trump Administration’s Foreign Policy: A Report.” govinfo.gov. https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/CPRT-116SPRT44275/html/CPRT-116SPRT44275.htm