A Forensic Analysis of China's 2025 Gold VAT Policy: Deconstructing the Public Narrative

Executive Summary

This analysis deconstructs the public narrative surrounding China’s November 1, 2025, gold VAT policy.

The officially stated motive—to “bolster government revenue”—is a deliberate misdirection. A forensic examination of fiscal data, policy contradictions, and state surveillance mechanisms reveals this policy is not a fiscal measure. It is a sophisticated strategic maneuver.

This report’s central finding is that the policy serves a tripartite objective, each crucial for state security:

Capital Control: Implement nationwide capital control by de-anonymizing the private gold market, halting a key vector for domestic capital flight.¹
State Accumulation: Suppress private demand to consolidate state-level gold accumulation, supporting its long-term de-dollarization strategy.²
Sanction Evasion: Create a laundered, state-auditable pipeline for processing sanctioned Russian gold, securing a supply chain for a key geopolitical ally.⁵

Deconstructing the Initial News Story

2.1 Source Credibility and Narrative Consensus

High-credibility financial news wires, primarily Bloomberg, disseminated the November 1, 2025, announcement of China’s gold policy change.⁷ A wide array of international and regional outlets then re-processed and syndicated this initial reporting.⁷

This process created an illusion of broad journalistic consensus. In reality, the narrative is an echo. The reporting is uniform because it originates from a single, state-controlled source: a “new legislation from the Ministry of Finance”.⁷ Republic World, for example, notes its summary includes “inputs from Bloomberg”.¹⁰

This single-source, state-driven origin is the first critical layer of evidence. It suggests the public framing is a matter of calculated policy. This controlled narrative is designed to frame the policy as a mundane fiscal adjustment, effectively diverting global attention from the true, multi-faceted strategic objectives.

2.2 Language and Framing: The “Revenue” Motive

The media’s framing is identical across all outlets. The policy’s stated purpose is to “bolster government revenue” ⁷ or “boost revenue”.¹⁰ This motive is explicitly linked to China’s well-documented economic woes: a “sluggish property market and weak economic growth” ⁹ that have “strained public coffers”.⁹

However, the articles present zero independent, quantifiable evidence to substantiate this claim. No analyst in the initial reports provides an estimate of how much revenue this policy will generate. Nor do they compare that figure to the fiscal shortfall it purports to address.

The reports conflate the policy’s effect—an “increase [in] the cost of buying gold for Chinese consumers” ⁷—with its motive. This is a classic narrative fallacy. The media has accepted the government’s explanation at face value, focusing on the consumer impact rather than challenging the motive’s veracity.

2.3 Deconstructing the Outlier: The “Benefit to India” Hypothesis

An outlier claim emerged in some regional analysis suggesting this policy could “benefit India as gold prices may decrease”.

This implied economic logic is facially plausible but fundamentally flawed. It follows this sequence:

The VAT change increases domestic gold prices in China.¹¹
These higher prices will “dampen retail demand”.¹¹
As China is the world’s largest consumer ¹⁵, a significant drop in its aggregate demand will lower the global spot price.
This lower global price benefits other major importers, like India.¹⁶

This model fails. It analyzes the Chinese gold market as if it were a free market driven solely by private consumers. It ignores the single most dominant actor: the Chinese state.

The People’s Bank of China (PBoC) is engaged in record-pace, strategic gold accumulation.² The logical action for a state actor that wants to acquire a scarce asset, and finds itself in competition with its own citizens, is to suppress private demand. This clears the market for state accumulation.

Therefore, any reduction in private demand will likely be absorbed by state demand. The net gold demand from China will not decrease, and the global price will not fall.

The “India benefit” hypothesis is a red herring. It is based on a critical misreading of the actors involved and the true nature of the policy.

Investigating the Economic Claims

3.1 The Stated Hypothesis: “This is a Revenue-Raising Measure”

The core claim—that this policy is a primary fiscal tool—is subject to investigation. The equivalent of peer review for a major state economic policy would be a public fiscal impact assessment, a white paper from the Ministry of Finance (MoF), or a detailed analysis from the State Taxation Administration (STA).

A review of the available evidence reveals no such documentation. No article links to or cites any official projection, calculation, or quantitative analysis from any Chinese state body.⁷

The PBoC’s H1 2025 report makes no mention of this policy, despite discussing monetary matters.²² Likewise, the MoF’s 2025 report is silent on this specific revenue measure.²³ This absence of supporting data is a significant indicator of a manufactured motive.

3.2 Extraordinary Claims & Contradictory Data

The claim that the Chinese state is actively disincentivizing gold accumulation is extraordinary. It directly contradicts simultaneous state actions that incentivize gold accumulation and market dominance.

Contradiction 1: State-Level Hoarding. The PBoC, along with other allied central banks, is buying gold at a record pace. This is a core pillar of a multi-year de-dollarization strategy.²
Contradiction 2: Market Easing. In September 2025, just one month prior to this new tax, the PBoC eased regulations for gold imports and exports. The stated goal was to “streamline” the flow of gold.²⁰
Contradiction 3: Market Development. China has been actively promoting the Shanghai Gold Exchange (SGE) as a yuan-denominated, physical-based alternative to the paper-based London (LBMA) and New York (COMEX) markets.²⁶

This creates a central paradox: Why would a state simultaneously make it easier for wholesale importers to bring gold into the country ²⁰ while making it more expensive for domestic retailers to sell it?

This is not a contradiction if the policies are aimed at two different actors. The state is deliberately creating a bifurcated market:

The State/Institutional Pipeline: The PBoC eases rules for wholesale importers, creating a high-speed, low-friction channel for state-level and institutional accumulation.
The Private/Citizen Market: The MoF removes the VAT offset for domestic retailers. This creates a high-cost, high-friction, and—as will be shown—fully surveilled “walled garden” for private citizens.

3.3 Vagueness and Lack of Data (The “Materiality” Red Flag)

The most significant red flag is the total absence of a single data point quantifying the expected revenue from this tax.

If the motive were genuinely fiscal, the policy would be accompanied by projections. Its absence suggests the figure is either immaterial (too small to matter) or inconvenient (publishing it would reveal the pretext). This vagueness is a classic tactic to avoid scrutiny. It forces analysts to focus on the effect (higher prices for consumers) rather than the true motive (control).

Investigating Financial and Business Aspects

4.1 The Pretext: Quantifying the “Revenue” Motive

The media’s framing of a “slowing economy” ⁹ is a gross understatement. The data indicates a structural crisis. This crisis forensically disproves the “revenue” motive.

The “sluggish property market” ⁹ is, in fact, a “five-year… real estate… crisis” ²⁸ that is “still searching for a bottom”.²⁹ This has directly collapsed the primary revenue source for local governments. These governments are “hit hard” and “structurally in deficit”.³⁰

Revenue from land sales, a key source of local government funding ³¹, has fallen. It dropped from a peak of 8.7 trillion yuan in 2021 to 4.9 trillion in 2024, with further declines expected.³³

This has created a “fiscal black hole” that the state is actively obscuring. The following table illustrates the vast gap between the officially reported deficit and the true consolidated deficit.

Table 1: China’s 2025 Fiscal Black Hole (Consolidated vs. Official Deficit)

Fiscal Metric (2025)	% of GDP	RMB (Projected)	Analysis
Official Deficit (General Budget)	4.0%	-4.80 Trillion	The number publicly reported by the MoF.[23, 34]
Gov’t Fund Budget (GFB) Deficit	4.4%	-6.24 Trillion	Deficit from the budget most impacted by the property crisis.[33, 34]
Consolidated Deficit (All Budgets)	8.8%	-12.49 Trillion	The true fiscal gap, “highest on record”.³⁴

This data provides the “smoking gun.” The state is obscuring an 8.8% consolidated deficit behind an “official” 4.0% figure.³⁴ The true fiscal gap is approximately 12.5 trillion yuan.

The revenue generated by applying a 13% VAT ³⁵ to a portion of the retail gold market is quantifiably insignificant against this 12.5 trillion yuan fiscal hole.³⁴

The “bolster revenue” motive ⁹ is, therefore, a demonstrable pretext. It is a fiscal “rounding error” presented as a major policy.

4.2 The Real Mechanism: The “Golden Tax” Surveillance Grid

This policy is not a tax. It is an enforcement mechanism for a new surveillance system. The key actors are not market participants but state agencies.

The Shanghai Gold Exchange (SGE): The SGE is not an independent market. The PBoC owns and controls it.³⁶ All gold imported into China must pass through the SGE.³⁶ It is a direct instrument of state policy.
The “Golden Tax Project” (GTS): This is the true mechanism of the new policy. The GTS is a “country-wide VAT administration and monitoring system”.³⁷ Phase IV, which is now active, represents a “transition from ‘managing tax through invoice’ to ‘managing tax through big data‘”.³⁷

This system creates a “four-level computerized taxation network”.³⁷ It links the State Taxation Administration (STA) with banks, ministries, and other institutions. It is designed to create a “data portrait” of every enterprise. It can “detect corporate tax evasion” by cross-referencing tax data with bank accounts, including the personal accounts of a company’s legal personnel.³⁷

The new VAT policy forces all gold retailers to have their VAT status managed for transactions originating from the SGE.⁷ This policy change is, therefore, a data integration event.

Its primary purpose is to force the entire domestic, private gold retail chain onto the state’s new “big data” surveillance grid. This effectively eliminates anonymity in the private gold market.

4.3 The Motive: Stopping Capital Flight

This new surveillance grid directly addresses one of the state’s most pressing problems: capital flight.

While the PBoC buys gold to de-dollarize, wealthy Chinese citizens buy gold for a different reason. They see it as a non-digital, anonymous store of wealth to preserve capital.³⁸ This bypasses the state’s official $50,000-per-year limit on foreign currency conversion.¹

The capital-flight data is stark:

China recorded a $136.9 billion capital and financial account deficit in Q2 2025.³⁹
Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) has collapsed. It reached a “30-year low” and recorded net outflows in Q3 2023 and Q2/Q3 2024.⁴⁰

This policy is not about revenue; it is about control. By forcing all gold transactions onto the “Golden Tax” surveillance grid ³⁷, the state achieves two capital control objectives:

Monitoring: It gains total visibility into which private citizens and entities are buying gold, when, and in what quantity. It links these physical assets to their digital bank accounts and tax profiles.
Deterrence: By removing the VAT offset, it raises the cost of using gold as a private wealth-preservation tool. This disincentivizes this form of capital flight.

Investigating External and Geopolitical Factors

5.1 State-Actor Affiliation: The Russian “Sanction-Evasion” Pipeline

This domestic policy is a key enabler of China’s foreign policy. Russia, a key strategic ally, is under severe Western sanctions that cut its gold miners off from the London (LBMA) and New York markets.⁴¹ China has “emerged as a crucial buyer” to fill this void.⁵

Data shows that Chinese imports of Russian precious metal ores, including gold, surged by 80% to $1 billion in the first half of 2025 alone.⁶ This provides Russia with a vital “revenue stream” that Western sanctions were designed to choke.⁵

This new VAT policy provides a sophisticated veneer of legitimacy for this trade.

The sanctioned Russian gold is imported and funneled into the only permissible channel: the PBoC-controlled SGE.³⁶ The new policy now ensures that all transactions flowing out of the SGE are meticulously registered on the “Golden Tax System”.³⁷ This creates a perfectly transparent, state-controlled, and auditable domestic ledger.

China can now co-mingle sanctioned Russian gold with its own domestic supply.⁴² If challenged on its role in processing sanctioned assets, Beijing can point to its “advanced, big-data” tax system ³⁷ as “proof” of its full compliance and transparency.

This system creates a complete, internally-consistent ‘know-your-customer’ (KYC) and anti-money-laundering (AML) paper trail. By forcing all gold through this SGE-GTS pipeline, the state can “cleanse” the origin of the bullion. External auditors or sanctioning bodies would be presented with an auditable domestic ledger. This makes it nearly impossible to definitively prove the co-mingling of sanctioned assets.⁵

It is a system designed to launder sanctioned assets in plain sight.

5.2 Geopolitical Strategy: The De-Dollarization Engine

This policy also serves China’s grand strategy: the de-dollarization of its reserves. China is on a “financial battlefield” ² and uses gold as a “trust anchor” for the yuan, moving away from the US dollar.²⁴

To do this, it must acquire thousands of tonnes of gold—a process it conducts in secret. The data in Table 2 reveals the vast discrepancy between China’s officially reported gold reserves and the estimated actual holdings.

Table 2: China’s Gold Hoard: The “Hidden Reserve” Discrepancy (2025)

Entity	Holding Type	Reported/Estimated (Tonnes)	Role & Implication
People’s Bank of China (PBoC)	Official State Reserves	~2,298 t	The officially declared holding, as reported to the world.[2, 43]
Chinese State (PBoC + SOEs)	Estimated State Reserves	~5,029 t	The estimated actual holding, including “hidden” reserves.⁴⁴
Discrepancy / “Hidden Reserves”	(Estimated – Official)	~2,731 t	The amount of gold accumulated in secret by the state. Proves a hidden strategy.[45]
Chinese Citizens (Private)	Private Reserves	~24,698 t	The vast pool of domestic gold the state views as competition.⁴⁴

This data reveals the core internal conflict the VAT policy is designed to solve. The Chinese state (estimated 5,029t) is in a secret war for gold with its own citizens (estimated 24,698t).⁴⁴ This creates massive internal competition.

The new VAT policy raises the cost for the 24,700-tonne private market, reducing their demand.¹¹ This reduces domestic competition for the state. It allows the PBoC to absorb more of the domestic and imported supply (like the sanctioned Russian gold) for its own “hidden reserves.”

This domestic market management supports the external strategy, described by analysts like Luke Gromen, of “draining London’s gold market”.²

5.3 Digital Asset Exposure & e-CNY

This policy connects the state’s physical and digital control grids. China is a world leader in Central Bank Digital Currency (CBDC) with its digital yuan (e-CNY).⁴⁶ The “Golden Tax Project” (GTS) is its parallel financial surveillance grid.³⁷

Gold is the primary non-digital competitor to a total-surveillance CBDC. An anonymous, untraceable, physical gold market is a direct threat to the state’s goal of total financial visibility through the e-CNY.²⁷

This VAT policy neutralizes that threat. It links physical gold transactions to the digital GTS surveillance grid. The state ensures that all major stores of value, whether digital or physical, are under the full monitoring and control of Beijing.

Probing for Blind Spots (The “Dog That Didn’t Bark”)

6.1 The “Dog That Didn’t Bark” (Part 1): The Silence of the SGE

The most conspicuous evidence is what is missing. The Shanghai Gold Exchange (SGE) is the central plumbing for this entire policy. All reports specify the tax applies to gold “purchased from the Shanghai Gold Exchange”.⁷

Despite a comprehensive review of market-facing communications ⁹, there is no evidence of any public statement, press release, or market guidance from the SGE itself.

A true financial market (like the LBMA or COMEX) would immediately issue detailed guidance to its members. It would analyze the market impact and lobby the government.

The SGE’s total silence confirms the analysis that it is not a “market” being “regulated.” It is a state agency—a direct subsidiary of the PBoC ³⁶—silently executing a pre-ordained state directive. Its silence is the silence of an instrument, not the voice of a market.

6.2 The “Dog That Didn’t Bark” (Part 2): The Silence of the World Gold Council (WGC)

The silence of the World Gold Council (WGC) is even more damning. The WGC’s entire raison d’être is to “stimulate and sustain demand for gold”.⁵² China is its most important global market.⁵² This new policy is the single largest negative intervention in that market in years and is universally reported as “dampening retail demand”.¹¹

Yet, a review of WGC publications and news feeds ¹⁴ shows zero commentary, analysis, or even acknowledgment of this major policy change as of November 1-2, 2025.⁴³

The WGC is in an impossible position.

It cannot praise the policy, as it is fundamentally anti-demand.
It cannot criticize the policy without publicly accusing its most important state partner, the PBoC, of implementing a pretextual policy for capital control and sanction evasion.

The WGC does comment on tax policy in other nations, such as India.⁵⁷ Its silence on China is therefore a deafening political signal. It is treating this event not as a “tax policy” but as a sensitive, sovereign geopolitical action that is “off-limits.” This is one of the strongest indicators of deliberate misdirection.

6.3 Challenging Assumptions: Reconciling the Policy Contradictions

A superficial analysis would find the state’s recent gold policies contradictory and “confused.” A more accurate analysis shows a sophisticated, bifurcated strategy:

Flow 1: The “State/Strategic Pipeline” (Low Friction)
- Action 1: Ease import rules for wholesalers.²⁰
- Action 2: Relax VAT export credits.⁵⁸
- Action 3: Massive, secretive state buying by PBoC.⁴⁴
- Result: A high-speed, low-cost channel for the state and its strategic partners (e.g., Russia ⁶) to accumulate bullion.
Flow 2: The “Private/Citizen Market” (High Friction)
- Action: Remove VAT retail offset.⁷
- Result: A high-cost, fully surveilled “walled garden” ³⁷ that deters private competition and ends anonymity.

The media narrative is, “China is cracking down on gold.” The opposite is true. The Chinese State is “all-in” on gold; it is cracking down on its citizens owning it.

Synthesis and Conclusion

7.1 Connecting the Dots: A Synthesis of Motives

The timing of this policy is not coincidental. It arrives at the precise moment that:

The domestic fiscal crisis has resulted in a “highest on record” consolidated deficit.³⁴
Capital flight has become endemic, with FDI at a 30-year low.⁴⁰
The economic pipeline from sanctioned Russia is surging.⁶

The public “revenue” motive is a public fiction. The disproportionality between the stated problem (a 12.5 trillion yuan fiscal hole) and the stated solution (a niche VAT on retail gold) is the final proof of this misdirection.

7.2 Identification of Three Core Hidden Objectives

Based on the forensic analysis, this investigation concludes with high confidence that the public “revenue” narrative is a deliberate misdirection. The policy’s true, unstated objectives are a tripartite strategic maneuver:

STRATEGIC OBJECTIVE 1: CAPITAL CONTROL. The policy is a de facto capital control. It forces all retail transactions ⁷ onto the “Golden Tax Project” Phase IV ³⁷, de-anonymizing the last major physical store of private wealth. It links gold purchases to the state’s central “big data” surveillance grid ³⁷, simultaneously monitoring and disincentivizing private capital flight.³⁹
STRATEGIC OBJECTIVE 2: STATE ACCUMULATION. The policy is a tool of strategic consolidation. By raising costs for the ~25,000-tonne private (citizen) market ¹¹, the state reduces internal competition for bullion. This allows the PBoC to continue its secretive, multi-thousand-tonne accumulation ² for its de-dollarization strategy ²⁵ without creating a domestic price squeeze that would alert global markets.
STRATEGIC OBJECTIVE 3: SANCTION EVASION. The policy is a sanction-laundering mechanism. It creates a superficially transparent and “fully-compliant” domestic ledger via the PBoC-controlled SGE ³⁶ and the STA’s GTS.³⁷ China can use this system to absorb and co-mingle billions of dollars in sanctioned Russian gold.⁶ The auditable data trail provides a veneer of legitimacy to legalize illicit assets, providing a critical economic lifeline to a key geopolitical partner.⁵

Implications and Broader Significance

The findings of this analysis carry significant implications for global markets, policymakers, and investors.

For Global Bullion Markets: This policy accelerates the “great divergence” between the Western “paper gold” markets (COMEX, LBMA) and the Eastern “physical gold” markets (SGE).²⁶ By clearing domestic competition, the Chinese state can continue its strategy of draining physical bullion from Western vaults ², placing long-term upward pressure on the physical price of gold.
For International Policy & Geopolitics: The policy provides a clear, scalable, and deceptively “transparent” model for bypassing US-led financial sanctions. It strengthens the economic and financial integration of the China-Russia axis ⁵, creating a robust, non-dollar circuit for strategic assets. This framework could be extended to other commodities.³
For Investors: The analysis confirms that gold is operating as a premier geopolitical asset, not merely an inflation hedge.²⁰ Investors holding unallocated “paper” gold (such as some ETFs) may face increasing counterparty risk as the disconnect between paper claims and available physical bullion widens.²⁷

Key Unanswered Questions (Limitations and Areas for Future Research)

The current analysis is based on publicly available information and its logical synthesis. The following key questions remain unanswered, representing limitations of this report and critical areas for future research:

What is the specific technical interface between the Shanghai Gold Exchange’s transaction logs and the State Taxation Administration’s “Golden Tax System” Phase IV?
How will Western institutions (e.g., the LBMA, major bullion banks) respond? Will they continue to treat SGE-processed gold as “good delivery” now that its role as a launderer for sanctioned assets is institutionalized? Their silence would be complicity.
What is the actual quantitative revenue projection for this tax? Locating the internal Ministry of Finance memo with this number would be the final piece of evidence to prove its immateriality.

Glossary of Key Terms

PBoC (People’s Bank of China): The central bank of the People’s Republic of China.
SGE (Shanghai Gold Exchange): The PBoC-controlled physical bullion exchange. All gold imported into China must pass through the SGE.³⁶
GTS (Golden Tax System): China’s nationwide VAT administration and surveillance system, which uses big data to monitor enterprises.³⁷
LBMA (London Bullion Market Association): The entity that oversees the global over-the-counter (OTC) market for gold and silver in London.
COMEX: A division of the New York Mercantile Exchange (NYMEX) that trades futures and options on metals, including gold.
e-CNY (Digital Yuan): The Central Bank Digital Currency (CBDC) issued by the PBoC.⁴⁶

Works Cited

U.S. Department of State, 2025 Investment Climate Statements: China, 2025, https://www.state.gov/reports/2025-investment-climate-statements/china
The Economic Times, Will the next world war be fought with gold? Here are the glaring statistics, October 2025, https://m.economictimes.com/news/international/us/will-the-next-world-war-be-fought-with-gold-here-are-the-glaring-statistics/articleshow/125017937.cms
Markets.com, RBI Gold Repatriation Strategy, October 2025, https://www.markets.com/news/rbi-gold-repatriation-strategy-1440-en
Forbes, Why A Weakening Dollar Has Investors Eyeing Gold And Silver, October 30, 2025, https://www.forbes.com/councils/forbesfinancecouncil/2025/10/30/why-a-weakening-dollar-has-investors-eyeing-gold-and-silver/
Reuters (via YouTube), Russia has been cut off from Western trading hubs…, October 2025, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GBe0e-fEfWU
Discovery Alert, Russia gold trade China 2025 changes geopolitical market, July 2025, https://discoveryalert.com.au/news/russia-gold-trade-china-2025-changes-geopolitical-market/
Livemint, China scraps gold tax perk, sending shockwaves through the bullion market, November 1, 2025, https://www.livemint.com/market/china-scraps-gold-tax-perk-sending-shockwaves-through-the-bullion-market-11761979264014.html
Business Standard, China ends gold tax break, raising consumer costs in key bullion market, November 1, 2025, https://www.business-standard.com/world-news/china-ends-gold-tax-break-raising-consumer-costs-in-key-bullion-market-125110100450_1.html
NDTV Profit, China Ends Gold Tax Break In Setback For Key Bullion Market, November 1, 2025, https://www.ndtvprofit.com/economy-finance/china-ends-gold-tax-break-in-setback-for-key-bullion-market
Republic World, China Ends Gold Tax Break: What It Means For Prices And Global Bullion Markets, November 1, 2025, https://www.republicworld.com/business/china-ends-gold-tax-break-what-it-means-for-prices-and-global-bullion-markets
Business Today, China ends tax incentive on gold sales, raising costs for consumers and retailers, November 1, 2025, https://www.businesstoday.in/personal-finance/investment/story/china-ends-tax-incentive-on-gold-sales-raising-costs-for-consumers-and-retailers-500445-2025-11-01
Malay Mail, China scraps gold tax break, sending shockwaves through global bullion market, November 1, 2025, https://www.malaymail.com/news/money/2025/11/01/china-scraps-gold-tax-break-sending-shockwaves-through-global-bullion-market/196821
Yahoo News (via Malay Mail), China scraps gold tax break, sending shockwaves through global bullion market, October 31, 2025, https://malaysia.news.yahoo.com/china-scraps-gold-tax-break-035229320.html
World Gold Council, India Gold Market Update: Festive shine, October 2025, https://www.gold.org/goldhub/gold-focus/2025/10/india-gold-market-update-festive-shine
GoldMarket.fr, What is the role of China and India in the gold market?, 2025, https://www.goldmarket.fr/en/quel-est-le-role-de-la-chine-et-de-linde-sur-le-marche-de-lor-2/
Business Today, China ends tax incentive on gold sales…, November 1, 2025, https://www.businesstoday.in/personal-finance/investment/story/china-ends-tax-incentive-on-gold-sales-raising-costs-for-consumers-and-retailers-500445-2025-11-01
World Gold Council, China Gold Market Update: Unseen investment passion, May 2025, https://www.gold.org/goldhub/gold-focus/2025/05/china-gold-market-update-unseen-investment-passion
Yahoo News (via Malay Mail), China scraps gold tax break, sending shockwaves through global bullion market, October 31, 2025, https://malaysia.news.yahoo.com/china-scraps-gold-tax-break-035229320.html
Livemint, China scraps gold tax perk…, November 1, 2025, https://www.livemint.com/market/china-scraps-gold-tax-perk-sending-shockwaves-through-the-bullion-market-11761979264014.html
Discovery Alert, China Gold Trading Regulations 2025, September 2025, https://discoveryalert.com.au/news/china-gold-trading-regulations-2025/
Business Standard, China ends gold tax break…, November 1, 2025, https://www.business-standard.com/world-news/china-ends-gold-tax-break-raising-consumer-costs-in-key-bullion-market-125110100450_1.html
People’s Bank of China, Executive Summary (H1 2025 Report), 2025, http://www.pbc.gov.cn/en/3688229/3688353/3688356/5624504/5846668/index.html
NPC Observer, 2025 MOF Report (English), March 2025, https://npcobserver.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/2025-MOF-Report_NON-FINAL_EN.pdf
The Economic Times, Will the next world war be fought with gold…, October 2025, https://m.economictimes.com/news/international/us/will-the-next-world-war-be-fought-with-gold-here-are-the-glaring-statistics/articleshow/125017937.cms
FinancialContent, Gold Defies Dollar Strength, Eyes $4,000 Milestone, October 30, 2025, https://markets.financialcontent.com/wral/article/marketminute-2025-10-30-gold-defies-dollar-strength-eyes-4000-milestone-amidst-global-flux
Discovery Alert, China Transforming Global Gold Market 2025, 2025, https://discoveryalert.com.au/news/china-transforming-global-gold-market-2025/
Discovery Alert, The Demise of the Paper Gold System: Physical vs Paper Markets, October 11, 2025, https://discoveryalert.com.au/news/paper-gold-physical-disconnect-dynamics-2025/
Atlantic Council, The winners and losers from China’s next five-year plan, October 24, 2025, https://www.atlanticcouncil.org/blogs/new-atlanticist/the-winners-and-losers-from-chinas-next-five-year-plan/
S&P Global, China Property Watch: The Chilling Effects Of Polarization, 2025, https://www.spglobal.com/ratings/en/regulatory/article/china-property-watch-the-chilling-effects-of-polarization-s101647911
Institut Montaigne, Local Governments’ Debt in China: Towards a Banking Collapse?, 2025, https://www.institutmontaigne.org/en/expressions/local-governments-debt-china-towards-banking-collapse
PIIE, China’s local governments’ reliance on land revenue drops amid property downturn, 2024, https://www.piie.com/research/piie-charts/2024/chinese-local-governments-reliance-land-revenue-drops-property-downturn
PIIE, China’s looming property crisis threatens economic stability, 2022, https://www.piie.com/blogs/realtime-economics/2022/chinas-looming-property-crisis-threatens-economic-stability
Rhodium Group, China’s Harsh Fiscal Winter, 2025, https://rhg.com/research/chinas-harsh-fiscal-winter/
National University of Singapore, China’s 2025 Budget: Expansion, Obfuscation, and the Need for Deeper Reform, April 2025, https://research.nus.edu.sg/eai/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/EAIC-89-20250418-2-2.pdf
Discovery Alert, China Platinum VAT Reform 2025, 2025, https://discoveryalert.com.au/news/china-platinum-vat-reform-2025-precious-metals-trade/
Mining.com, China can and will confiscate gold from SGE, banks and Chinese citizens, 2025, https://www.mining.com/web/china-can-and-will-confiscate-gold-from-sge-banks-and-chinese-citizens-when-it-suits-them/
China Briefing, China’s Golden Tax System Phase IV: An Explainer, 2022, https://www.china-briefing.com/news/chinas-golden-tax-system-phase-iv-an-explainer/
Discovery Alert, China’s Gold Buyers Squeeze 2025, 2025, https://discoveryalert.com.au/news/chinas-gold-buyers-squeeze-2025-prices-heights/
Trading Economics, China Capital Flows, Q2 2025, https://tradingeconomics.com/china/capital-flows
AMRO, Is Declining FDI into China a Cause for Concern?, April 2025, https://amro-asia.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/Analytical-Note-Is-Declining-FDI-into-China-a-Cause-for-Concern_clean-1.pdf
Latham & Watkins, Sanctions Update: EU, UK Sanctions Target Russian LNG, Major Russian Companies, October 2025, https://www.lw.com/en/insights/sanctions-update-eu-uk-sanctions-target-russian-lng-major-russian-companies
Discovery Alert, China Strategic Gold Accumulation 2025, 2025, https://discoveryalert.com.au/news/china-strategic-gold-accumulation-2025-us-tensions/
World Gold Council, Gold Breaks Records as Investors Seek Shelter From Market Turbulence, October 30, 2025, https://www.gold.org/news
Gainesville Coins, Estimated Chinese Gold Reserves Cross 5,000 Tons, June 3, 2025, https://www.gainesvillecoins.com/blog/estimated-chinese-gold-reserves-cross-5000-tons
FXStreet, Data Discrepancy Highlights Difficulty of Tracking Chinese Gold Reserves, August 19, 2025, https://www.fxstreet.com/analysis/data-discrepancy-highlights-difficulty-of-tracking-chinese-gold-reserves-202508192049
University of Pennsylvania Law Review, China’s CBDC, 2023, https://scholarship.law.upenn.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1090&context=alr
Goldenpi, China’s Digital Yuan: How the e-CNY Could Disrupt SWIFT, Devalue the Dollar, and Reshape Global Finance, 2024, https://goldenpi.com/blog/market-view/chinas-digital-yuan-how-the-e-cny-could-disrupt-swift-devalue-the-dollar-and-reshape-global-finance/
China Briefing, China’s Golden Tax System Phase IV: An Explainer, September 2021, https://www.china-briefing.com/news/chinas-golden-tax-system-phase-iv-an-explainer/
The Exchange Asia, China Scraps Gold Tax Exemption, Dealing Blow To Major Bullion Market, November 1, 2025, https://theexchangeasia.com/china-scraps-gold-tax-exemption-dealing-blow-to-major-bullion-market/
Outlook Business, China Ends Gold Tax Incentive; Retail Prices Set to Rise, November 1, 2025, https://www.outlookbusiness.com/news/china-ends-gold-tax-incentive-retail-prices-set-to-rise
Business Today, China ends tax incentive on gold sales…, November 1, 2025, https://www.businesstoday.in/personal-finance/investment/story/china-ends-tax-incentive-on-gold-sales-raising-costs-for-consumers-and-retailers-500445-2025-11-01
World Gold Council, China gold market: progress and prospects, 2014, https://www.gold.org/sites/default/files/China%20gold%20market%20%20progress%20and%20prospects.pdf
World Gold Council, India Gold Market Series: Gold Investment, Market and Financialisation, 2025, https://www.gold.org/goldhub/research/india-gold-market-series-gold-investment-market-and-financialisation/18072
World Gold Council, India’s Gold Market: Reform and Growth, 2025, https://www.gold.org/download/file/18332/Indias-Gold-Market-Reform-and-Growth.pdf
World Gold Council, New report uncovers scale of exploitation by artisanal gold miners, 2025, https://www.gold.org/news-and-events/press-releases/new-report-uncovers-scale-exploitation-artisanal-gold-miners-fund
World Gold Council, Weekly Markets Monitor: Calm interrupted, October 2025, https://www.gold.org/goldhub/gold-focus/2025/10/weekly-markets-monitor-calm-interrupted
World Gold Council, India’s gold import duty, July 2019, https://www.gold.org/goldhub/gold-focus/hashtag/gold-import-duty
Mayer Brown, Asia Tax Bulletin: Autumn 2025, October 2025, https://www.mayerbrown.com/en/insights/publications/2025/10/asia-tax-bulletin-autumn-2025
Nationwide Coins, Chinese Gold Buying Exceeds What Beijing Declares, 2025, https://nationwidecoins.com/blogs/news/chinese-gold-buying-exceeds-what-beijing-declares
Daily Sabah, Reserves rewritten: Gold rush behind de-dollarization, 2025, https://www.dailysabah.com/opinion/op-ed/reserves-rewritten-gold-rush-behind-de-dollarization
JPMorgan, Gold prices: Outlook 2025, 2025, https://www.jpmorgan.com/insights/global-research/commodities/gold-prices

A Forensic Analysis of China’s 2025 Gold VAT Policy: Deconstructing the Public Narrative